WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Jan Jeltes
Case No. DAU2008-0012
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc., of California, United States of America, represented by Middletons Lawyers, Australia.
...The Respondent's argument appears to be that there are at least two meanings for the term “Google”, namely, GOOGLE being the search engine, trade mark and brand belonging to the Complainant, and “google” being a verb to search the Internet via the GOOGLE search engine. ...
2008-11-05 - Case Details
As at the date of filing the Complaint1, it
resolved to a website, the home page of which was headed “Google Partners” and featured the claim
“Google – We assign you the best certified specialists in your area! ...Other website content included; “Connect with your Google Expert – A Google
Expert or Google Partner is a digital marketing agency certified by Google through its Google Partners
program […]”. ...
2022-05-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
РІШЕННЯ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОЇ КОМІСІЇ
Google LLC проти Aлександр Дмитрович Бутенко
Справа № DUA2020-0009
1. Сторони
Позивачем є Google LLC, Сполучені Штати Америки, якого представляє AEQUO, Україна.
...Оспорюване Доменне Ім’я повністю відтворює добре відомий Знак для товарів і послуг GOOGLE Позивача з єдиною відмінністю в останній літері. Знак для товарів і послуг GOOGLE є добре впізнаваним в Оспорюваному Доменному Імені. ...
2020-06-25 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO
Google LLC c. David Álvarez
Caso No. DES2021-0016
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, Estados Unidos de América (EE.UU.), representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...A la fecha, la marca GOOGLE es una de las marcas más relevantes, valoradas y conocidas en España y a nivel mundial.
- La Demandante ofrece un programa llamado “Google Partners” de marketing para agencias de publicidad o terceros que administran cuentas de Google Ads en nombre de otras marcas o empresas...
2021-06-21 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent contends, first, that the domain name is not confusingly similar to the GOOGLE trademarks. “Google” is a generic word meaning “to search Internet with Google search engine” and “bay” means to keep something at a distance, as in to keep it at bay. ...The Respondent, however, argues that the word is being used in the domain name as a verb (to “google”) and hence is not referring to Google itself but to the process of what might be called “googling”, but not necessarily with Google facilities. ...
2007-08-27 - Case Details
Anyway, my company Felix Group, Ltd in the USA is presently in charge of over 1,250 campaigns for the American clients).
Google knows well what domains are offered to whom, so, if you didn't know, they are the owners of all the domains which include the word Google and the name or abbreviated form of the country (just a few examples: go to the WhoIs for the domains: google-rs.com, google-hr.com, google·ba.com, google-me.com and look at the name of the owner). ...Google is a protected name and can only be used with the permission by Google. Anyway, how can you explain the fact that the sponsored advertisements for our company appear on Google browser with the exact domain GoogleSrbija.com written in it, if, otherwise, it would not be allowed to us? ...
2012-01-04 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. G Sainath
Case No. D2010-2005
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of Mountain View, California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
...The Complainant
The Complainant has produced a listing of its trademarks internationally for the word GOOGLE running to some 38 pages. The Complainant has also produced scans of a number of trademark registration certificates, including:
GOOGLE, People’s Republic of China trademark registration no. 1471705, valid from November 7, 2000 to November 6, 2010 (expired), class 42
GOOGLE, People’s Republic of China trademark registration no. 1451705, valid from September 28, 2000 to September 27, 2010 (expired), class 35
GOOGLE, People’s Republic of China trademark registration no. 1473896, valid from November 14, 2000 to November 13, 2010 (expired), class 9
GOOGLE, Australian trademark registration no. 1130283, dated January 15, 2007, classes 36, 38
GOOGLE, Australian trademark registration no. 1049124, dated November 14, 2005, classes 16, 25, 35
GOOGLE, Australian trademark registration no. 788234, dated November 3, 2000, classes 9, 38, 42
GOOGLE, Indian trademark no. 1351910, dated April 20, 2005, class 16
GOOGLE, Indian trademark no. 845041, dated March 12, 1999, class 9
GOOGLE, Indian trademark no. 1404165, dated December 6, 2005, class 9
GOOGLE, Indian trademark no. 1404168, dated December 6, 2005, class 42 (with error)
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is nearly identical or confusingly similar to its trademark GOOGLE. ...
2011-01-14 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO
Google LLC c. Antonio Valle
Caso No. DES2020-0047
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, con domicilio en Estados Unidos de América, representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...Reyes Campello Estebaranz
Experto
1 Véase entre otras, Google Inc. v. Lede Tyh,
Caso OMPI No. D2011-1495; Google Inc. v. Google Adwords Service at HCMC, Vietnam,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2021-01-06 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO
Google LLC c. Javier Cruz Fernandez
Caso no. DES2021-0042
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, Estados Unidos de América (“Estados Unidos”), representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...Insiste la Demandante que la reproducción de la marca GOOGLE hará pensar al usuario encontrarse en un sitio oficial cuando ello no es así. La adición del término “ok” provoca confusión con el asistente de la Demandante denominado “ok google”.
...
2021-12-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Mr. Racha Ravinder
Case No. D2009-1454
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
...The Complainant's name and mark GOOGLE was coined and adopted in 1997 by the company's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. The Complainant has obtained trademark registrations for its mark Google around the world. ...
2010-01-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. xeo, Xeocook
Case No. D2009-1675
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
...The Complainant's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, invented and adopted the name and mark GOOGLE in 1997. The Complainant has obtained trademark registrations for its mark GOOGLE around the world.
...
2010-03-02 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Ning Yang
Case No. D2011-1044
1. The Parties
1.1 The Complainant is Google Inc. of Mountain View, United States of America, (the “Complainant”) represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
1.2 The Respondent is Ning Yang of Victoria, Australia (the “Respondent”).
2. ...It is on record that “comScore” and “www.bloomberg.com” have ranked GOOGLE as the most visited group of websites in the world. The Complainant’s GOOGLE Network reaches more than 80% of worldwide Internet users. ...
2011-08-23 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. AA
Case No. DRO2010-0009
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Rominvent S.A., Romania.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
A.1.The Complainant holds rights in the GOOGLE trademark
The Complainant has provided sufficient evidence showing that it is the owner of the GOOGLE mark. ...
2011-03-31 - Case Details
Trademark
Country
Class
Registration Date
1104306
GOOGLE
European Community
09, 35, 38 and 42.
March 12, 1999
4316642
GOOGLE
European Community
16, 25 and 35.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
That it is the rightful owner of the GOOGLE trademark on a worldwide basis through numerous trademark registrations.
That the disputed domain names fully incorporate the GOOGLE trademark, and that the addition of the term “mapsforyou” only increases the risk of confusion due to the fact that said term makes reference to the Google Maps service.
...
2015-05-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Globehosting, Inc.
Case No. DRO2014-0011
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of Mountain View, California, United States of America (the “USA”), represented by Rominvent S.A., Romania.
...The disputed domain name consists of the terms “google” and “adwords”, which are identical with the Complainant’s registered trademarks GOOGLE and ADWORDS. ...
2015-01-06 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. Subhash Kumar
Case No. D2025-4210
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google LLC, United States of America (“United States”), represented by
Fidus Law Chambers, India.
...The Complainant is the owner of a number of trademark registrations for GOOGLE (the “GOOGLE
trademark”), including the following representative registrations:
− the Indian trademark GOOGLE (word) with registration No. 845041, registered on March 12, 1999, for
goods in International Class 9;
− the United States trademark GOOGLE (word) with registration No. 2954071, registered on May 24, 2005,
for goods and services in International Classes 9, 16, 18, 21, 25 and 35; and
− the Indian trademark GOOGLE (combined) with registration No. 2297910, registered on March 13, 2012,
for services in International Class 42.
...
2026-01-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Nijat Hassanov
Case No. D2011-1054
1. The Parties
1.1 The Complainant is Google Inc. of United States of America; (the “Complainant”) represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
1.2 The Respondent is Nijat Hassanov of Azerbaijan (“the Respondent”).
2. ...The Complainant’s Google Network reaches more than 80% of worldwide Internet users. Apart from “www.google.com”, the Complainant also owns and operates a number of other Google domains worldwide. ...
2011-08-22 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO
Google Inc. c. Jeykumara
Caso No. DES2014-0003
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google Inc. con domicilio en Mountain View, California, Estados Unidos de América, representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...Derechos o intereses legítimos
La Demandante ha demostrado un uso efectivo de sus marcas GOOGLE Y GOOGLE GLASS de tal manera que sus servicios y sus productos quedan perfectamente identificados con las mismas.
...
2014-04-04 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Billa Rajinikar Reddy
Case No. D2009-1390
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of Mountain View, California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates, India.
...The Complainant's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, invented and adopted the name and mark GOOGLE in 1997.
The Complainant has obtained trademark registrations for its mark GOOGLE around the world. ...
2010-01-25 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO ADMINISTRATIVO
Google LLC c. Hiper Spain SL, Villamática S.L. y Juan Manuel Bonillo Diaz
Caso No. D2019-2009
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, Estados Unidos de América, representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...El Demandado registró los nombres de dominio en disputa en 2015 y 2019, varios años después del registro de la marca GOOGLE. Los nombres de dominio en disputa reproducen íntegramente la marca GOOGLE y la combina con la palabra “maps” para reproducir el nombre de la utilidad web “Google Maps” de la Demandante. ...
2019-11-14 - Case Details