Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
The Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
6. In accordance with Paragraph B(11) of the ADR Rules the Panel decides that the disputed domain name be revoked.
...
2020-10-27 - Case Details
The Complainant is ANACI - Associazione Nazionale Amministratori Condominiali e Immobiliari, of Italy, and the Respondent is Rosario Calabrese c/o Unione Nazionale Amministratori d’immobili, of Italy.
The disputed domain name is . The disputed domain name was registered on August 12, 2020 with Aruba S.P.A. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
The Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
In accordance with Paragraph B(11) of the ADR Rules the Panel decides that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant and that the Complaint does not constitute an abuse of administrative proceeding.
...
2021-05-20 - Case Details
De Geschillenbeslechter voegt hieraan toe dat de Regeling is gebaseerd op de Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”). De UDRP biedt een procedure om evidente gevallen van domeinnaamkaping (cybersquatting) op een effectieve en efficiënte wijze tegen relatief beperkte kosten aan te pakken. ...De domeinnaam bestaat uit de term “Klimaatgarant” met genoemde spelfout en stemt derhalve overeen met het dominante element van het beeldmerk, zodat de domeinnaam naar het oordeel van de Geschillenbeslechter verwarringwekkend overeenstemt met het KLIMAATGARANT Merk.
Het country code Top-Level Domain “.nl” is een technisch registratievereiste dat buiten beschouwing kan worden gelaten bij dit oordeel (zie Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...
2021-12-15 - Case Details
Dat is een andere vraag dan die uit het merkenrecht of handelsnaamrecht, waarbij bijvoorbeeld ook relevant zijn de betrokken waren of diensten, gemiddelde consument en het geografische gebied waarin wordt geopereerd (vgl. Rockwool International A/S v. usrockwool.com / US Rockwool LLC, formerly US Fireproofing LLC,
WIPO Zaaknr. D2013-1022).
Bij het vergelijken van de handelsnaam van Eiser met de Domeinnaam, wordt het Top-Level Domain “.nl” buiten beschouwing gelaten (vgl. ...Gregor Vos
Geschillenbeslechter
Datum: 20 december 2016
1 Hoewel de Eis is ingediend onder de Regeling, en niet onder de Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”), zal de Geschillenbeslechter, vanwege de overeenkomsten tussen deze regelingen, verwijzen naar UDRP precedent indien van toepassing....
2016-12-27 - Case Details
使用争议域名提供付费链接不属于对域名的善意使用（bona fide use）。参见早些时候涉及LEGO商标的案件，如LEGO Juris A/S v. J.h.Ryu， WIPO 案件编号 D2010-1156：被投诉人使用争议域名支持付费广告，对争议域名的此种使用不属于善意提供商品或服务。（原文为：“Further, Respondent’s use of the Disputed Domain Name to sponsor links to paid advertising is not use of the Disputed Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.”。 ...被投诉人的行为可能直接误导想购买LEGO产品的消费者去购买LEGO竞争者的产品。(Hitachi Ltd. v. Value Domain, WIPO 案件编号 D2010-1433)。被投诉人的以上行为可构成“故意吸引互联网用户访问被投诉人网站或其他在线网址以获得商业利益”。令互联网用户对被投诉人网站或网址或者该网站或网址上的产品或服务的来源、赞助商、从属关系或担保方面造成与投诉人商标产生混淆的可能性。...
2011-10-10 - Case Details
La Commission administrative se réfère également à la décision:
- American Express Marketing & Development Corp. contre alexanderwechsler, Litige NAF N° 1399523 (en anglais uniquement) concernant : “According to Complainant, the Disputed Domain Name resolves to a website that offers information about Complainant’s products. A review of the site proves this to be the case. The evidence submitted by both sides indicates the web site is a fan site, prominently including Complainant’s CENTURION name and logo throughout the site. The web site creates a false association with American Express and its Centurion Card. ...
2012-02-21 - Case Details
/Gerardo Saavedra/
Gerardo Saavedra
Experto Único
Fecha: 18 de junio de 2024
3Canva Pty Ltd v. Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0162636820 / Andrea Banfi, Canva Templates, Caso OMPI No. D2022-2195: “The
fact that the Domain Name now directs to an inactive page does not prevent a finding of bad faith given the totality of circumstances and
prior use”. Véase también la Sinopsis de la OMPI 3.0, sección 3.3.
4Chevron Corporation and Chevron Intellectual Property LLC v. Shawn Bailey, Caso OMPI No. D2023-3993: “said website operating a
registration facility section which asks for personal contact details, make this Panel consider that the disputed domain name may
potentially be used for fraudulent activities”. ...
2024-06-26 - Case Details
Gerardo Saavedra
Experto Único
Fecha: 14 de octubre de 2021
1 En vista de que la Política es una variante de la Política uniforme de solución de controversias en materia de nombres de dominio (“UDRP” por sus siglas en inglés), este Experto considera apropiado referirse, en la medida de lo aplicable, a la doctrina reflejada en la Sinopsis de la OMPI 3.0 y a decisiones rendidas bajo la UDRP.
2 Véase Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha (Casio Computer Co., Ltd.) v. Jongchan Kim,
Caso OMPI No. D2003-0400: “There is no evidence that the Complainant authorized the Respondent to register the disputed domain name or to use the CASIO trademark, with or without immaterial additions or variants. These circumstances are sufficient to constitute a prima facie showing by the Complainant of absence of rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name on the part of the Respondent”. Véase la sección 2.1 de la Sinopsis de la OMPI 3.0.
3 En TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. ...
2021-10-25 - Case Details
Il Centro ha esaminato il Ricorso per verificarne la conformità alla Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (la “Policy”), alle Norme per la Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (le “Norme”) e alle Norme Supplementari per la Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (le “Norme Supplementari”).
...Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc., and Prestige Brands International, Inc. c. The domain is not for sale / Motohisa Ohno,
Caso OMPI No. D2006-0608; Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. c. ...
2008-01-10 - Case Details
Bellgr, Inc., se indicó: “The Panel finds that ‘confusing
similarity’ includes similarity of a nature that would be likely to cause
those familiar with the trademark to assume that there is a connection of some
sort between the trademark owner and the domain name”.
Teniendo en cuenta el criterio mencionado, este Experto estima que, para considerar la efectiva concurrencia de un riesgo de confusión entre los Nombres de Dominio y las marcas de la Demandante, de su comparación debe derivarse un riesgo claro de asociación o conexión de la Demandante con los Nombres de Dominio. ...Estas diferencias no
obstante, no deberían tenerse en cuenta pues se derivan de los actuales parámetros
de uso de los nombres de dominio en el marco del DNS (Domain Name System).
Así lo han considerado numerosas decisiones adoptadas en el marco de la Política
(ver, por ejemplo, las decisiones en el Caso OMPI
Nº D2000-0812, New Cork Insurance Company c. ...
2006-03-22 - Case Details
Identité ou similitude prêtant à confusion
L’observation du défendeur, arguant du fait que le droit de marque du requérant est postérieur à la date de réservation du nom de domaine litigieux par le défendeur, est inopérante dans le cadre de l’analyse de la première condition du paragraphe 4(a): les Règles d'application n’imposent nullement que les droits du requérant sur l’élément objet de l’atteinte soient antérieurs à la réservation du nom de domaine litigieux, voire même antérieurs à l’introduction de la plainte (Cf. The State of Tennessee, USA contre (DOMAIN NAME 4 SALE) DOMAIN-NAME-4-SALE eMAIL baricci@attglobal.net,
Litige OMPI No. D2008-0640).
L’existence du droit du requérant sur l’élément objet de l’atteinte est un critère purement objectif ne s’inscrivant aucunement dans une logique de comparaison chronologique avec la date de réservation par le défendeur du nom de domaine litigieux: la Commission administrative doit se contenter de constater si de un tel droit existe ou non.
...D2010-1147; Credit Industriel et Commercial S.A., BanqueFédérative du Crédit Mutuel contre Headwaters MB,
Litige OMPI No. D2008-1892; Banque Saudi Fransi v. ABCIB,
Litige OMPI No. D2003-0656; Islamic Bank of Britain Plc contre Ifena Consulting, Charles Shrimpton,
Litige OMPI No. ...
2012-01-20 - Case Details
또한 신청인은 저명성이 있지만 미등록된 상표권에 대해 신청 가능성을 인정한 사례로서 신청인은 Airport Authority
v. Hong Kong Airport, Inc (WIPO 사건번호
D2001-1417), Gallerina v. Mark Wilmhurst (WIPO
사건번호 D2000‑0730), Jeanette Winterson v. ...입증책임
통일도메인이름분쟁해결규정을 위한 절차규칙 (Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy) 제14조에 따라 신청인의 분쟁해결 신청서가
피신청인에게 통지되었음에도 불구하고 피신청인은 신청인이
주장하는 사실이나
입증방법에 대해 실질적으로 어떤 답변을 하지 않는 현 상황에서 패널은
신청인이 제출한
주장과 입증방법에 대해 적절하다고 판단되는
추정을 할 수 밖에 없다. ...
2003-01-08 - Case Details
또한 신청인은 저명성이 있지만 미등록된 상표권에 대해 신청 가능성을
인정한 사례로서 신청인은 Airport Authority v. Hong Kong Airport, Inc
(WIPO 사건번호 D2001-1417), Gallerina v. Mark Wilmhurst (WIPO 사건번호
D2000-0730), Jeanette Winterson v. ...입증책임
통일도메인이름분쟁해결규정을 위한 절차규칙 (Rules for Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy) 제14조에 따라 신청인의 분쟁해결 신청서가
피신청인에게 통지되었음에도 불구하고 피신청인은 신청인이 주장하는
사실이나 입증방법에 대해 실질적으로 어떤 답변을 하지 않는 현 상황에서
패널은 신청인이 제출한 주장과 입증방법에 대해 적절하다고 판단되는 추정을
할 수 밖에 없다. ...
2003-01-08 - Case Details
pagina 4
Volgens vaste rechtspraak onder de Regeling dient het country code Top-Level Domain “.nl” bij de
beoordeling ten aanzien van verwarringwekkende overeenstemming buiten beschouwing te worden gelaten
(zie ook Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...Recht of Legitiem Belang
Op grond van artikel 2.1 sub b van de Regeling dient Eiser te stellen en te bewijzen dat Verweerder geen
recht heeft op of legitiem belang heeft bij de Domeinnaam. Volgens vaste rechtspraak onder de Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) en zoals is bevestigd onder de Regeling in Technische
Unie B.V. and Otra Information Services v. ...
2022-05-25 - Case Details
Verder wijst Eiser erop dat volgens vaste jurisprudentie onder de Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP") van ICANN, waarop de Regeling is gebaseerd, registratie van een domeinnaam, direct na het wereldkundig maken van een nieuwe naam, een indicatie is dat de verweerder wist van de bekendmaking. ...Het country code Top-Level Domain ".nl" is een technisch registratievereiste dat buiten beschouwing kan worden gelaten bij dit oordeel (zie Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...
2017-10-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
UITSPRAAK GESCHILLENBESLECHTER
Prof. Dr. Geert Hofstede en Geert Hofstede B.V. v. Lotom Group S.A.
Zaaknr. DNL2008-0043
1. Partijen
Eisers zijn Prof. Dr. Geert Hofstede en Geert Hofstede B.V., Velp, Nederland.
...Geregistreerd of Gebruikt te Kwader Trouw
De Regeling vereist, anders dan de Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, registratie of gebruik te kwader trouw (artikel 2.1 c van de Regeling) .
...
2008-11-25 - Case Details
De Handelsnaam en de Domeinnaam stemmen verwarringwekkend overeen, omdat de Domeinnaam in zijn geheel de Handelsnaam omvat, zij het zonder het koppelteken. Het country code Top-Level Domain “.nl” doet hier niet aan af, omdat dit een technisch registratie vereiste is dat buiten beschouwing kan worden gelaten bij dit oordeel (zie Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...DNL2011-0055; Arend Albert van Arnhem, Top Management Drunen B.V. v. Mobility Media B.V.,
WIPO Zaaknr. DNL2016-0043; en onder meer mVisible Technologies, Inc. v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.,
WIPO Zaaknr. ...
2017-01-19 - Case Details
The Complainant owns several French and European Union Trade Marks for COLAS RAIL and COLAS.
The disputed domain name is . The disputed domain name was registered on June 29, 2020, and was resolving to a parking page and was used for fraudulent email purposes.
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks COLAS RAIL and COLAS; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and, the disputed domain name was registered as well as used in bad faith.
...
2020-12-02 - Case Details
D2012-1303; Instagram, LLC v. Temp Name Temp Last Name, Temp Organization;
Caso OMPI No. D2019-0249).
Los correos electrónicos que se han enviado desde la dirección que incorpora al nombre de dominio en disputa del Titular, han creado la falsa impresión de que estos fueron mandados por las Promoventes, lo cual conforma una conducta de confusión por asociación. Ello hace imposible que el Titular tenga derechos o intereses legítimos sobre el nombre de dominio en disputa (ver sección 2.13.1 de la Sinopsis de las opiniones de los grupos de expertos sobre determinadas cuestiones relacionadas con la Política UDRP, tercera edición, “Sinopsis elaborada por la OMPI 3.0 ”; ver también The Swatch Group AG / Swatch AG v. packy phim,
Caso OMPI No. D2018-0851; Instagram, LLC v. Temp Name Temp Last Name, Temp Organization,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-12-06 - Case Details
센터는 2005년
6월 23일, Gabia, Inc.에 분쟁대상인 도메인이름의 등록기관확인(registrar verification)을 전자우편으로 요청하여
2005년 6월 30일에 확인 답변을 전자우편을 통해 받았다. 2005년 7월 1일에 센터가 분쟁해결신청서 흠결을 통지함에 따라 신청인은
2005년 7월 14일에 수정, 번역된 분쟁해결 신청서를 제출하였다. 센터는 분쟁해결 신청서가 통일도메인이름 분쟁해결규정(Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, 이하 “규정”), 통일도메인이름분쟁해결규정에관한규칙(Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, 이하 “규칙”), 통일도메인이름분쟁해결규정에관한WIPO의보충규칙(WIPO
Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, 이하 “보충규칙”)에서
요구하는 형식요건을 충족시켰음을 확인하였다.
...
2005-09-29 - Case Details