The disputed domain name was registered on September 7, 2006, and is not pointed to an
active website, but it is offered for sale on a domain name marketplace. ...The Rules define Reverse Domain Name Hijacking as “using the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a
registered domain-name holder of a domain name”.
...
2023-03-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complainant submitted screen print-outs dated October 27, 2005, showing that the connection to failed, and that the connection to the domain name results in an error message indicating that the domain name does not exist.
...
2006-02-15 - Case Details
Respondent is Rob Waters aka Robert Waters of Atkinson, New Hampshire, United States, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-08-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on November 26, 2018, and the disputed domain name was registered on January 24, 2019.
...
2019-06-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amendment to the Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complainant asserts that the domain name resolves to an active website incorporating adult content, while the domain name resolves to an inactive website. ...
2009-05-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...At the time of drafting the Decision, one of the Domain Names resolved to a webpage informing the Domain Name was suspended, the other to an inactive webpage.
5. ...
2020-09-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wael Salah, IQ, 69 Montgomery St, San Francisco, CA 94104, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name at issue is .
The Registrar is Dotster, Inc.
3. ...The domain is a 3-letter domain that can be matched to a number of companies or products.
10. The previous owner placed the domain name on auction for the highest bidder and the Complainant had just as equal an opportunity to acquire the domain name, but did not.
11. ...
2002-03-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tamara Ivanova, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bassel Djaroueh, Lebanon.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-08-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bharat Kumar with an address at Arihant Complex, Hampi Road, District Bellary, Hospet, Karnataka 583 201, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is "bombaydyeing.com". The Registrar is DotRegistrar.com and is located at 9032 NW, 12th Street, Miami, FL 33172.
3. ...On July 5, 2000, the Registrar (Internic) confirmed that it is not the Registrar of the domain name in dispute.
3.3 On August 14, 2000, the Center made a second request to Registrar (Internic) for verification of registration data. ...
2001-03-20 - Case Details
Respondent is Benjamin Ogden of Melbourne, Florida, United States, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2018-09-10 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant adds that the content of the website associated with the disputed domain name shows that the Respondent has sought to target the Complainant’s INSTA and INSTAGRAM trademarks through the disputed domain name.
...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / yoyo ben, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-08-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yevhenii Shynkar, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-03-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The domain name resolves to a website that operates as a pay-per-click site. The Respondent has listed the Domain Names for sale for $10.000 per domain name.
...
2020-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Susan Stewart Susan Stewart, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. ...The domain name in dispute (the Domain Name) was registered on November 7, 2021.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2022-12-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The subject domain names do not comprise the legal name of the Respondent or a name that is otherwise commonly used to identify the Respondent. ...
2004-11-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the complaint satisfies the formal
requirements of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
Policy), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Rules),
and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the Supplemental Rules). ...Thereafter, it appears that Sau Wong and his father decided to register
the name. The foregoing, plus Sau Wong’s failure to use the domain name, and
his father’s alleged intention not to use the domain name, support the inference
that Sau Wong registered the domain name to prevent Salomon from reflecting
SSB Direct in a corresponding domain name and to disrupt the business of Salomon.
...
2001-07-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Spherexx.com, Becca Wilson, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TierraNet
d/b/a DomainDiscover (the “Domain Name”).
3. ...Even if Respondent were to be found to be passively holding the Domain Name, Respondent has still registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith because the domain name involves a well-known trademark and there is not possibility of a good faith use of the Domain Name. ...
2005-12-12 - Case Details
Four of the Domain Names redirect to other Domain
Names reflecting the above-referenced impersonating website and one Domain Name redirects to another
domain name that is not part of these proceedings, but similarly reflects a web store allegedly offering the
Complainant’s products.
5. ...The Domain Name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2023-10-12 - Case Details