The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
In cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. ...
2018-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hirofumi Nishioka of Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-08-08 - Case Details
For convenience, where relevant the Panel will refer to each of the disputed domain names in this proceeding as follows:
: disputed domain name No. 1
: disputed domain name No. 2
: disputed domain name No. 3
: disputed domain name No. 4
: disputed domain name No. 5
4. ...The disputed domain names were registered on the following dates:
Disputed domain name No.1 on February 5, 2016;
disputed domain name No.2 on August 21, 2017;
disputed domain name No.3 on February 19, 2017;
disputed domain name No.4 on October 6, 2017;
disputed domain name No.5 on October 29, 2015.
...
2018-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is WHOISGUARD Protected, WHOISGuard Inc. of Panama / Pascal Pengs of New York, New York, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("Domain Name") is registered with Enom, Inc. d/b/a enom.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...Based on the above, the Center then verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-01-25 - Case Details
The Complainant claims that because the Respondent offered to sell the domain name to the Complainant for a value in excess of any out of pocket costs directly related to the domain name, he has registered the domain names in bad faith.
The Complainant also says that not only did the Respondent offer to sell the domain name , but that he also registered the domain names and as soon as the Complainant mentioned its interest in the domain name .
...
2001-03-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Oscar Music and Media Ltd whose registered office is at 8 Rhoda Street, London E2 7EF, England.
2. Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The domain name in issue is "lookhear.com"; the Registrar is Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...The Respondent has not approached the Complainant with an offer to sell the domain name, "lookhear.com". The Respondent would prefer to use the domain name and, therefore, rejected the Complainant’s offer to buy the domain name for a nominal fee.
5.8 The fact that the Respondent is not using the domain name is not indicative of bad faith. ...
2000-08-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent is not, the Complainant says, using the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, nor is its use of the domain name a legitimate non commercial or fair use. ...
2008-03-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is wwwviagra.com, also known as Mike Anders, of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
This dispute concerns the domain name identified below:
(the "Domain Name")
The registrar with whom the domain name is registered is CORE Internet Council of Registrars, located in Geneva, Switzerland.
...(2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(3) that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith by the Respondent.
...
2002-03-14 - Case Details
The domain name at issue contains the first name of the Respondent and is not linked to an active website.
...The Swiss Supreme Court considered that in the case of a conflict between a trademark and a domain name, the content of the website linked to the domain name would be determining, but that the sole registration of a domain name can be sufficient to establish the violation of a trademark right if the trademark is well-known (4C.31/2004 = sic! ...
2006-11-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tiziana Murado, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhang Juan of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xiamen Nawang Technology Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-11-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Herr Norbert Kurzmeier, KUNO GmbH, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...By registering a
domain name that comprises the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, the Respondent has created a
domain name that is identical to the Complainant’s trademark, as well as its domain
name. ...
2023-08-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sondre Sagstuen, Rush Partners Ltd of London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”), represented by Rush Partners Ltd., United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domeneshop AS dba domainnameshop.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-12-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Ruler-Domains, Sergey Ryabov of Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-09-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Name was registered on October 31, 2022. The Domain Name
was registered on November 4, 2022, and the Domain Name
was registered on November 5, 2022.
...
2023-09-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Further, paragraph 3(c) of the UDRP Rules provides that
a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by
the same domain name holder.
In the present case, there are two disputed domain names and with two sets of registrant details.
...
2023-02-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cha Baekjin of Busan, Republic of Korea, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2018-03-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rachid Elkezazi, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainants' official website is located at the domain name , registered in 2001.
The disputed domain name was registered on December 29, 2021. ...
2024-02-12 - Case Details
Instead of offering the disputed domain name for sale, the Respondent used the disputed domain name as a parking and/or landing page featuring pay-per-click links. ...The Respondent did not deny that the content behind the disputed domain name was changed to a parking page and that the disputed domain name is currently inactive. The Respondent stated that the disputed domain name was not used for commercial purposes, as the Respondent claimed that he is a hobbyist who collects domain names.
...
2015-12-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The position regarding the disputed domain name is slightly less straightforward. This domain name constitutes the addition of three letters to the Complainant’s DELL mark. ...
2004-11-24 - Case Details