In the response on May 18, 2015, Respondent repeated that he chose the Domain Names because “accor” in Japanese means “agreement” in Arabic, his native language. He provided a Google translation of the word “アコール” (“accor” in Japanese) to Arabic and then to English.
Respondent further argues in the May 18, 2015 response that through his research he has found more than thirty domain names registered under the name “Accor” that do not belong to the hotel company. ...
2015-08-06 - Case Details
Further, there is no evidence indicating that the Respondent is commonly known by the term "zeirashoes" nor could there ever be any by virtue of the exclusive trademark rights residing in the Complainant in the mark ZIERA – rights that existed before the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. In that regard, a Google search (the results of which appear in Annex KBL-23 to the Complaint) for the name "Zeira" reveals no entity related to the Respondent. ...
2016-08-17 - Case Details
As discussed above, Respondent is not authorized or licensed by Complainant to use the Domain Name, Respondent is not affiliated, sponsored or endorsed by Complainant, Respondent’s WhoIs information does not suggest that Respondent is commonly known by the Domain Name and extensive Google searching has not uncovered any legitimate reason for Respondent to be using the Domain Name.
For the reasons discussed above, Complainant has met its burden of proving that Respondent has acted in bad faith by registering the Domain Name, as required under Policy, paragraph 4(a)(iii).
...
2016-03-23 - Case Details
However, "the Policy and the Rules do not provide the Panel with any authority to ascertain the Respondent's credibility given the limitations on filings, the absence of discovery and the procedural efficiencies that are a part of (although admittedly occasionally detrimental to) this process." Google Inc. v. Blue Arctic LLC, NAF Claim No. 1447355. Accordingly, "while [i]t may be that Complainant could develop evidence of…lack of legitimate interest in a legal proceeding that would allow more evidentiary development…....
2016-05-31 - Case Details
While rendered under a different policy, noting the similarities, the Panel finds that the case, Google Inc. v. Q Interactive Pty Ltd / Mr. Victor Quinteros,
WIPO Case No. DAU2012-0026, is instructive on this point. ...
2022-02-24 - Case Details
Further, conducting a search for the term “Bimbosan” on Google leads to a list of results showing a connection with the Complainant.
Second, the Complainant submits that it has not authorized, licensed or permitted the Respondent to register or use the Disputed Domain Name or to use the trademarks BIMBOSAN as an element of a domain name. ...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
The words “consumer” and “reports” in English can and are used
according to their common meaning and their use cannot be unequivocally associated with the
Complainant’s trademark or website. The top Google search results for “air travel consumer reports” display
pages of website, and the Complainant’s website is ranked third. ...
2022-05-17 - Case Details
Найменування Позивача не є схожим із позначенням Skyeng. Пошукова система Google не пов’язує Позивача із позначенням Skyeng. Свідоцтво України, яке було видане лише у 2020 році на Торговельну Марку SKYENG на ім’я Позивача, зараз оскаржується в українському суді. ...
2021-04-30 - Case Details
Complainant further submits that anyone who has access to the Internet can find Complainant’s trademarks on public trademark databases. Results on popular search engines such as Google for the term Bulgari list Complainant’s brand and services as the first result.
Complainant explains that a cease and desist letter was sent by Complainant’s representatives on August 28, 2020. ...
2021-04-28 - Case Details
At the later date, the website contained what purported to be the comments of, principally, former employees of the Complainant, although these were undated and identified only by job titles.
The Panel conducted a Google search against a sample of two of the comments included on the Respondent’s, website, which purported to have been made by “Customer Services Operator (Former Employee) and “Warehouse Operative (Former Employee)” respectively. ...
2021-05-28 - Case Details
La palabra “hesperia” es un nombre común geográfico, el nombre de una actriz, el nombre de una película, etc. Al buscar en Google el término “hesperia”, el Demandado no ha encontrado ninguna referencia a la marca de la Demandante. ...
2021-05-20 - Case Details
La Demandada no ha sido conocida corrientemente por el nombre de dominio en disputa; al ingresar su nombre y el término “rotoplas” en el motor de búsqueda Google, no se arrojan resultados espontáneos.
La Demandada no es titular de ningún registro de marca para “rotoplas” y tampoco es licenciataria de la misma; al realizar una búsqueda por titular de registros marcarios a través del sistema en línea del IMPI, se observa que la Demandada carece de marcas registradas o solicitudes en relación con ROTOPLAS.
...
2021-05-12 - Case Details
Eiser heeft daarnaast een ongedateerde screenprint overgelegd van een advertentie op een
Google search pagina, waarop is vermeld “Camperland – voor al uw onderdelen en accessoires” en “Bij
Camperland kun je terecht voor controle onderhoud en reparatie van jouw camper”. ...
2022-09-27 - Case Details
A aucun moment le nom de domaine litigieux
n’apparait dans les résultats de Google pour une recherche sur le nom PAST KOLOR. Les produits vendus
sur le site de la Défenderesse sous le nom PAST KOLOR sont des produits authentiques achetés auprès de
la Requérante. ...
2022-08-18 - Case Details
The Complaint attaches evidence suggesting that the Respondent uses Google keyword advertising to
promote search results for all three of its websites, the Rocket Credit Scores website and the websites at
“www.idiq.com” and “www.myscoreiq.com”, when Internet users search on the terms “rocket”, “credit”, and
“score” together.
...
2022-07-15 - Case Details
The documents filed by the Complainants on June 17, 2022 are: PAN card of Technoarete, a copy of a
Partnership Deed of Technoarete of the year 2013, bank statement for Technoarete from 2013 to 2015,
Income Tax Returns for Technoarete for the years 2014-15 and 2015-16, screen shot of Gmail account
opening in 2013, screenshot of email of Google Adwords dated September 26, 2013, screenshot of the use
email info@technoarte.com, screen shot of email received regarding registration of disputed domain name
June 26,2013, domain name purchase email with invoice received on May 13, 2014 and
invoice for the IFERP domain name. ...
2022-07-14 - Case Details
A reasonable investigation would have revealed the weaknesses of the Complaint under the Policy. A simple Google search of “azul music” would have made it clear that these terms have numerous meanings and are being actively used by various individuals and organizations. ...
2021-11-04 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 6, 2021. ...
2021-11-02 - Case Details
A quick trademark search for MICHELIN would have revealed the Complainant’s rights to the Respondent, as would a simple Google search with a similar keyword. The worldwide and high level of notoriety of the Complainant transcends national borders. ...
2021-10-11 - Case Details
The Disputed Domain Names have been used as follows:
- resolves to a Google service site at “https://sites.google.com/view/south-
coast-shipping-company/home”, which is a website (the “Respondents’ Website”) which purports to be
a website for “South Coast Shipping Company”. ...
2022-08-12 - Case Details