As to rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, the Complainants essentially contend that, even if the Respondent was not under an obligation to search for Turkish national trademarks at the time of registration, he should have had carried out a basic Google search in respect of the ASSAN or ASSAN PANEL trademark. Then these would have yielded obvious references to the Complainants and their use of the name as trade/service trademarks. ...
2014-03-06 - Case Details
优酷网于2006年正式上线，经过多年发展和推广，在中国及全球领域均享有很高的知名度。优酷网在全球在线视频网站中名列第二，仅次于Google旗下的Youtube，是全球最大的中文视频网站。2010年12月8日，优酷网正式在美国纽约证交易所 挂牌上市(Youku Inc)，成为中国第一家在海外规模上市的视频网站，也是全球首家独立上市的视频网站。 ...
2013-11-07 - Case Details
Among other materials, the Complainant provides evidence (through a declaration of one of its directors) of Google search results for “quarry valuations” and “quarry value”. The Complainant claims that its own website and trademark occupies the top three search results for “quarry valuations” and the top two search results for “quarry value”.
...
2013-11-26 - Case Details
The Panel has typed the disputed domain name in the Google search engine. Already the eighth hit shown by this search engine displays the disputed domain name. ...
2014-02-05 - Case Details
The Respondent has used the Domain Name to display descriptive and meaningful pay-per-click advertising links related to the keyword "renter" contained in the Domain Name since 2003. The links are auto-generated by Google and are constantly changing based on Google's keyword advertising inventory and user search behaviour and demand.
...
2015-07-21 - Case Details
于2011年10月，全球领先的互联网监测机构Comscore 发布全球视频网站排行，投诉人的Youku优酷网在全球在线视频网站中名列第二，仅次于Google旗下的Youtube，成为全球最大的中文视频网站，也是全球前五大视频网站中唯一上榜的中国网站。
经过多年发展和推广，Youku优酷网在中国及全球领域均享有极高的知名度，自上线至今赢得了诸多荣誉，包括2011年1月21日，Youku优酷网获 “中国互联网品牌竞争力排行榜” 冠军及2012年4月1日，Youku优酷网获《新周刊》2011中国电视主榜 “最佳视频网站” 大奖等。
...
2014-03-24 - Case Details
It hosts the disputed domain name and others it has registered through “Hitfarm.com” which it says is a service that places pay-per-click (PPC) advertising links based on a Google advertiser feed on hosted domain names, sharing the advertising revenue with the domain name owners.
...
2014-03-20 - Case Details
- The Complainant highlights that a search for the term “Loehmann’s” on the United Kingdom version of Google produces approximately 661,000 results, the very first of which is for the Loehmann’s web site located at “www.loehmanns.com”. ...
2014-05-27 - Case Details
Given the significant third party use pointed to by the Respondent (including that Google search results for “Stages” provide 1,250,000,000 results of which, at least the first two pages show no reference to Complainant) and the Panel’s finding that the Respondent’s denial of knowledge of the Complainant has not been discredited, the Panel is not willing to find that the Respondent intentionally attempted to attract business to his site by creating a likelihood of confusion with the STAGES Marks as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of the web site or related services.
...
2015-09-15 - Case Details
The Complainant observes that the disputed domain names resolve to websites on which the Respondent attempt to entice Key-Systems customers and RRPproxy users to switch to Freenom services.2 The Complainant further presents evidence of the Respondent's use of the disputed domain name in a Google advertising campaign using the search term "RRPproxy" (titled "Reselling with RRP proxy?") to attract Internet users searching for the Complainant's services to the Respondent.
...
2015-05-29 - Case Details
因此，投诉人合理地推测被投诉人知晓BALMAIN这一商标并且对投诉人所从事的时尚奢侈品行业有较多了解。
即使被投诉人辨称不知道投诉人的商标，但其通过关键词“balmain”可以在Google/Baidu或者任何其他搜索引擎找到该关键词与投诉人和其产品相关的结果。
投诉人于2015年2月5日以电子邮件向被投诉人发送停止侵权警告函。被投诉人分别于2015年2月5日和2015年2月6日回复投诉人，承认其为职业域名注册人/投资人，且进一步提议愿意以20000元人民币将争议域名出售给投诉人。...
2015-05-20 - Case Details
The Panel's own searches in search engines such as Google revealed on its first pages only hits related to the Complainant and its different business activities. ...
2018-01-04 - Case Details
Así mismo, modificó el contenido alojado en los nombres de dominio desplegándose una imagen con el texto siguiente “EXALUMNOS DEL TECNOLOGICO – Directorio Independiente de Egresados”.
7) De la búsqueda realizada de la denominación “exatec”, en los exploradores Google, Bing y Yahoo se desprende como principales resultados la página “www.egresados.itesm.mx” de la Promovente, así como otros sitios web vinculados con la misma.
8) Los nombres de dominio en disputa generan confusión a los usuarios y les hacen creer que en los sitios Web alojados bajo los nombres de dominio en disputa podrían consultar los servicios que ofrece el Tecnológico de Monterrey, o bien que los mismos tengan relación directa con la Promovente. ...
2017-03-06 - Case Details
The Complainant notes that when “Riemann” and “Spain” are entered into the Google search engine, most of the results point to the Complainant or its business activities.
The Complainant submits that it is not legitimate to register a domain name and use it for a PPC website where such domain name includes a trademark and has no dictionary or descriptive meaning and where the sponsored links have no relationship to any alleged descriptive meaning of the domain name. ...
2017-03-16 - Case Details
The current use of the disputed domain name is highly confusing and misleading for both Internet users and radio listeners, who may think that the aforesaid website and the related links are somehow connected to the Complainant, which is not true;
- When registering the disputed domain name, the Respondent knowingly chose the domain name consisting of the Complainant’s trademark, with the mere addition of the letters “fm” at the end, for if the Respondent had carried out even a basic Google search in respect of the wording RADIO MARIA, the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant. ...
2017-05-04 - Case Details
The Respondent also states that, before registering the disputed domain name, the Respondent made searches on Google and various online trademark databases and genuinely concluded that the disputed domain name was safe to register.
...
2017-04-25 - Case Details
Anyone can see that “euro view” is a combination of two obviously generic terms. A google search of “euroview” term yields 18,300,000 hits.
The Complainant’s mark is not as well known as marks like “마이크로소프트 [Microsoft], 삼성 [Samsung], HP, Cocacola”.
...
2016-09-28 - Case Details
/ Yeonju Hong, Dzone Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0836; Google Inc. v. Dzone Inc., Yeonju Hong/ Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1033; Jaguar Land Rover Limited v. ...
2015-09-29 - Case Details
Asimismo la Promovente cuenta con un número bastante extenso de seguidores en diversas redes sociales como Facebook, Google Plus, Instagram, Pinterest, Twitter y YouTube.
Entre otras, la Promovente es la titular de las siguientes marcas registradas:
Registro
Marca
Clases
País o jurisdicción de la marca
Fecha de Registro
941384
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
35
México
6 de febrero de 2009
941386
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
43
México
24 de febrero de 2009
1557320
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
42
Estados Unidos de América
19 de septiembre de 1989
1961586
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
42
Estados Unidos de América
12 de marzo de 1996
850560
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
29, 30, 31, 32 y 33
Unión Europea
26 de enero de 2000
4974994
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
3, 5, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 43
Unión Europea
22 de marzo de 2006
La Promovente tiene registrado su nombre el dominio desde el 10 de mayo de 1999.
...
2015-09-25 - Case Details
Respondent argues that there is an entire world of games that are identified as either “addicting games” or “addictive games”, which generally have the characteristic of being simple in design, but frustrating in performance. A search on the Google search engine reveals literally thousands of addicting games websites. Thus, Respondent claims that the words “addicting games” fail to function as a trademark. ...
2015-09-21 - Case Details