About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 61256   document(s)s (0.119 sec)

Rows

<<  <  58101 - 58120  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3876 for only-fans.asia, only-fans.vip pdf (173 KB)

The disputed domain name is set up to permanently redirect to the second disputed domain name , which in turn redirects to . ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2023-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4910 for primacarne.net pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is Paul Familara, Innovate Strategic Resource Marketing Inc, New Zealand 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2024-02-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-1444 for enovadevs.com pdf (169 KB)

The Respondent is ABDUL GHAFFAR, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on April 3, 2025. The Complainant provided screenshots, taken on April 2, 2026, of the website to which the disputed domain name resolved. ...

2026-05-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2018-0033 for technal.com.au html (21 KB)

The Respondent is Nader Ragheb of Sefton, Australia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with TPP Wholesale Pty Ltd. 3. ...The Registrar’s confirmation further stated that: (a) the registrant contact name and organization for the disputed domain name is Jack Shiber of Technal Aluminium Pty Ltd; (b)the technical contact name and organization for the disputed domain name is Alex Ibarcena of Logic Digital and “Nad Ragheb” of Worth It Designs; and (c) the administrative contact for the disputed domain name is Jackie Shiber of Technal Aluminium Pty Ltd. ...

2019-01-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1262 for redbymarcecko.com html (20 KB)

The Respondent is Caribbean Online International Ltd., Nassau, Bahamas.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with BelgiumDomains, LLC.   3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2007-11-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0998 for natwest.org html (18 KB)

The Respondent is Faisal Ilyas of Cardiff, Wales CF24 4QE, UK.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is ("the Domain Name), registered with Register.com ("the Registrar").   3. ...The Center checked the Complaint for compliance with the formal requirements of the Policy, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2003-01-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0901 for bwin2.com, bwin788.com html (11 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The Website had links that lead to a website connected to the domain name. This website displayed request fields for an ID and password which did not appear to work. ...

2011-07-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2011-0010 for espa.net.au html (15 KB)

The Respondent is Espa of Australia Pty Ltd., Carol Fleming of Wonga, Queensland, Australia. 2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s) The disputed domain name is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd. 3. ...The Respondent’s subsequent use of the Disputed Domain Name to point to its website only after receiving notice of the Complainant’s rights in May 2005 is consistent, according to the Complainant with the Respondent having registered and having sought to use the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith. ...

2011-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2021-0097 for shopmeraki.co html (16 KB)

The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf / Yousseff Ali, United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant states that it has not authorised the Respondent to use the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent affiliated with it. The disputed domain name is not derived from the Respondent’s name. ...

2022-03-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0229 for tambour.com html (22 KB)

The Center verified that thе Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The official website of the Complainant is located at the domain name . The disputed domain name was registered on March 12, 2005. It resolves to a landing page containing an invitation to interested parties to buy the disputed domain name. 5. ...

2019-04-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-2032 for wikipediya.com, wilipedia.com html (10 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...Rights or Legitimate Interests Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of non-exhaustive circumstances any of which is sufficient to demonstrate that a respondent has rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name: (i) before any notice to the respondent of the dispute, the respondent's use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the disputed domain name or a name corresponding to the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or (ii) the respondent (as an individual, business, or other organization) has been commonly known by the disputed domain name even if the respondent has acquired no trade mark or service mark rights; or (iii) the respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trade mark or service mark at issue. ...

2016-01-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0779 for rollingcentre.com html (23 KB)

The Respondent is Gate Systems Limited, Hungerford, Berkshire United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows.   3. ...The Respondent registered the domain name on January 29, 2004, the Respondent also registered the domain name on January 29, 2004 . ...

2005-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1916 for t-mobilepicturee.com, t-mobilepoctures.com, t-mobilwpictures.com, tmobilepicrures.com, tmobilepicturez.com, tmobilepidtures.com html (10 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to the domain name; and iii. Respondent’s domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. ...

2008-03-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0335 for bankintesa.net, bankintesa.org, intesabanca.net, intesabank.net, intesabank.org, intesabankasi.com, intesainsurance.com html (16 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...In particular, the disputed domain name is almost identical to the trademark BANCA INTESA and to the domain name . ...

2014-04-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0184 for sunspotsmediacenter.com html (20 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“Supplemental Rules”). ...Respondent is an individual named John Laprad with an address in Worchester, Massachusetts. He is not commonly known by the domain name and is not making a legitimate noncommercial use of the domain name. Respondent uses the term “Sun Spot Media Center” only in relation to the disputed domain name. ...

2010-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2016-0016 for informz.co html (22 KB)

Respondent is Shih Koon Chia, Assure IT Pte Ltd of Singapore, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant alleges that Respondent registered the Domain Name for the intended purpose of profiting from the possible sale of the Domain Name to Complainant and effectively that is the true purpose for the registration of the Domain Name. ...

2016-06-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0842 for aaccordhotels.com html (21 KB)

The Respondent is Ramesh S of India, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent has no prior rights or legitimate interest in the Domain Name. The registration of the ACCOR and ACCORHOTELS trademarks preceded registration of the Domain Name. ...

2019-06-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0626 for attlassian.com html (20 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute/ Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2016-05-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3236 for lucideus.com html (22 KB)

The Respondent is Tmotius Michael, Indonesia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Why, then, did the Respondent register the disputed domain name and point it to an online gambling website via what appears to be a restaurant’s domain name? ...

2021-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0460 for cybertill.com html (20 KB)

The Respondent is Darren Casey of Waverley, Essex, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Chocolatecovereddomains, LLC (The “Registrar”).   3. ...ii. The Respondent registered the Domain Name in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting the trade mark in a corresponding domain name. ...

2006-07-12 - Case Details