- Información del Titular, Víctor Hugo Quevedo Orihuela, obtenida de la página Web de Google.
- Resultado obtenido en la página Web “www.marcaperu.pe”, la cual muestra el título “el Tour de los Inkas”...
2014-02-11 - Case Details
The Complainant states that the Respondent’s bad faith is further illustrated by the fact that the Respondent was officially informed of the Complainant’s rights in the UDI’S GLUTEN FREE mark after a US Digital Media Copyright Act complaint was sent to Google, Inc. Despite the notice, the website remains active.
4. The Complainant has performed a search based on the contact number listed on the WhoIs details and found that the Respondent has registered numerous domain names, under various different aliases, but the Registrar and contact details remain the same. ...
2013-11-18 - Case Details
However, no advertising schedule or media buying reports or contracts have been submitted to verify when and where this advertising occurred, if it did. Google Adsense reports are annexed and do show higher activity in the periods December to January and March than in February 2013, which may support an inference that advertising did occur in those months as claimed
The apparently small scale and very intermittent operation of that business would not be enough by itself to discount the Respondent’s claim to bona fide use or demonstrable preparations to use the disputed domain names, if that were all. ...
2013-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent suggests that the assignment of the said trademark was a sham transaction designed to give the Complainant a basis for attempting to hijack the disputed domain name. The Respondent supplies a Google search showing no online reference to the assignor of the trademark registration in connection with the trademark.
...
2014-02-05 - Case Details
- El nombre de dominio en disputa ha sido registrado de mala fe, porque la marca MICHELIN es notoria y el registro de un nombre de dominio idéntico o confundible con una marca notoria o renombrada es constitutivo de mala fe, todo ello sin perjuicio –según la Demandante– de que una búsqueda en el registro de marcas español o en Google hubiera permitido al Demandado conocer a la Demandante y sus derechos. A juicio de la Demandante, el nombre de dominio en disputa también está siendo usado de mala fe, ya que el nombre de dominio en disputa conduce a una página que reproduce la marca MICHELIN, un logotipo que usa el mismo diseño gráfico que el de MICHELIN, estando presente el “Muñeco Michelin”. ...
2014-04-24 - Case Details
Moreover, Respondent is located in Texas where Complainant has its principal place of business and over 130 bank branches throughout the state. A Google search of the terms "commerica" or "comerica" produces an extensive listing of search results devoted almost exclusively to Complainant and its COMERICA brand and mark.
...
2014-05-23 - Case Details
A search on "www.ancestry.com" of US Census and voter lists yields 33,411 results. A Google search excluding reference to the Complainant reveals approximately 12,500,000 third party results, mainly showing up for the surname "Ritchey". ...
2014-08-19 - Case Details
The disputed domain name does not resolve to a website or other substantive online presence and the Respondent has not taken any steps to develop a website or use the disputed domain name in a legitimate manner since 2001.
A Google search does not bring up any reference to a website at the disputed domain name and a company search in the Massachusetts company registry reveals that “The Reale Group” does not exist as a corporation. ...
2015-02-23 - Case Details
- Dado el carácter genérico de la denominación y la connotación de la "X" para los contenidos de carácter erótico, las argumentaciones de la Demandante no son suficientes para acreditar la existencia de mala fe.
- Realizando una búsqueda en Google sobre la denominación XVIDEOS, la página del Demandado no aparece en los 10 primeros lugares, por lo que no se puede hablar de un aprovechamiento de la fama de la Demandante...
2016-10-27 - Case Details
A substantial volume of evidence has been produced including:
- articles or advertisements reproduced from six editions of a publication “Krásy Slovenska” (Beauty of Slovakia) from May-June 1997 to May-June 1999 under the “Zajo” name;
- sample invoices and lists of all invoices issued from 1996 through 2002 under the name “Zajo”, and a purchase contract with a supermarket;
- documents supporting an international presence of the unregistered trademark ZAJO, including an invoice from Malden Mills, USA, dated August 25, 2001 and invoices to addresses in the Russian Federation, Germany and the Czech Republic;
- a short history of the unregistered trademark ZAJO up to 2009, and two pages of a Google search for “Zajo” conducted on April 29, 2009.
On February 11, 2011, the Complainant succeeded in having another’s Romanian trademark for “Zajo” declared invalid by Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (“OHIM”) on the basis of the Complainant’s Slovakian national trademark number 211221 and, according to the relevant Decision, on the basis of the Complainant’s “non-registered word trademark “ZAJO” used in the course of trade in the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia ...”.
...
2015-10-30 - Case Details
Indeed, in this case, the Panel has been invited to conduct a Google search using the name of the Complainant's hotel complex, Palais Stephanie, and from the results of that search, supported by the fact that the Complainant's website has an English language version, the Panel would have thought that there was scope for the Complainant to have made out an argument on those lines. ...
2016-04-08 - Case Details
- Copias de los resultados de búsqueda obtenidos en Google.
- Capturas de pantalla de la página previamente vinculada al nombre de dominio en disputa provenientes de los Archivos del Internet...
2016-04-18 - Case Details
The introductory paragraph on the
landing page stated:
“Accelerated ODK solution to get started
With years of experience in data collection and managing ODK our expert system engineers are ready to
provide you managed ODK central services on our managed Cloud or other providers like google [sic] Cloud,
AWS, Digital Ocean etc.”
Other sections included prominent headings “ODK Central – Collect Data”, “ODK Central – Cloud Deployed
The quickest way to start” and “Why ODK Central Nextgen cloud services.”
...
2022-06-01 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names and are registered with
Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 31, 2022.
...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
The
Complainant also shows that when searching for the term “bitpanda” on Google, the first page only provides
results related to the Complainant.
Moreover, according to evidence provided by the Complainant, the Respondent has registered himself on
the Complainant’s platform in 2017, more than four years before the registration of the Disputed Domain
Name. ...
2022-11-14 - Case Details
En dernier lieu, le Requérant indique qu’au terme de ses recherches dans la base de données de l’Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle et sur Google, d’une part, le Défendeur ne détient pas de marque constituée du terme “autoentrepreneur“, et d’autre part, il n’a pas trouvé de résultat entre le nom du Défendeur en lien avec le signe AUTOENTREPRENEUR...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
При встановленні першого елементу обсяг аналізу обмежується лише порівнянням торговельної марки та оспорюваного доменного імені, в той час як інші обставини справи досліджуються в рамках аналізу інших елементів відповідно до Політики .UA (див. Google LLC v. Aлександр Дмитрович Бутенко, справа ВОІВ No. DUA2020-0009).
З урахуванням наведеного вище Комісія приходить до висновку, що оспорюване доменне ім’я є ідентичним торговельній марці FONBET Позивача і, відповідно, Позов Позивача задовольняє вимогам параграфу 4(a)(i) Політики .UA.
...
2020-09-04 - Case Details
Esta página web se identifica como “plataforma de afectados por AVATRADE” e incluye diversos foros en los que alega dar cabida a las opiniones de usuarios afectados o presuntamente según se indica “estafados” por la Demandante y su grupo empresarial, así como enlaces a las páginas de esta plataformaen las principales redes sociales (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, Pinterest, Tumblr y Google Fotos). En la página de inicio de este sitio web se muestra un aviso, resaltado de forma destacada, encerrado en un recuadro de color rojo, indicando lo siguiente:
“AVISO: La información contenida en este blog representa la experiencia personal de los componentes de la Plataforma de Afectados por AvaTrade por la actividad económica de AVATRADE. ...
2022-02-17 - Case Details
The Respondent states that while the Complainant’s own website is a prominent first result for a search on its own name, the Respondent’s website appears on the fifth page of a Google Search and even further in Bing and DuckDuckGo, after listings about the use of the word “netblocks” as a technical term in the networking field and by other commercial actors. ...
2020-11-17 - Case Details
According to evidence provided by the Complainant from Google Analytics, there were over 42 million and 72 million user sessions on that website in 2019 and 2020, respectively, of which 27,000 and 68,000 visits in 2019 and 2020, respectively, emanated from Australia. ...
2021-07-30 - Case Details