The Complainant has put up evidence in support of its extensive promotions under its “Hunt Lascaris” trade name and can be located under that name on a Google search.
The Complainant also put up evidence of international accolades received by it, notably a Cannes Film Festival award, one from the International Film & TV Festival of New York, and was the first advertising agency in the southern hemisphere to win the International Agency of the Year Award in 1994. ...
2018-07-20 - Case Details
The Complainant states that a search of the words “Desjardins Capital” on the Google search engine demonstrates links to many webpages managed by its group and that searches on social media also confirm its association with that term in the context of financial services.
...
2018-08-13 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the Respondent tries to corner the Vietnamese market with respect to the oil and lubricant goods by using a domain name comprised of MOTUL trademark, as if he were the sole MOTUL reseller in Viet Nam, which he is not;
The Complainant further asserts that the Respondent was aware of the existence of the Complainant’s trademark by arguing that prior to the registration of the Disputed Domain Name, a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword “motul” would have shown up results which relate to the Complainant and its product.
...
2018-07-03 - Case Details
Complainant states that a quick MICHELIN trademark or Google search would have revealed to Respondent the existence of Complainant and its trademark and that Respondent’s failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith. ...
2019-05-02 - Case Details
En apoyo a este uso aporta documental relacionada con el uso de la expresión “whatsapp marketing” así como documental sobre sobre las campañas efectuadas en relación con el nombre dominio en disputa en Google Adwords.
Fundamenta igualmente sus derechos e intereses legítimos en el hecho de que los servicios prestados por el Demandado se refieren a servicios no ofrecidos por la Demandante, lo que evita cualquier conflicto competencial. ...
2019-07-18 - Case Details
The Panel also notes that the expression “binancé flowers”, which the Respondent says translates into English as “paired flowers”, is not actually a French expression. Google Translate does, however, offer that translation as a translation from French to English.
As the Complainant points out, the business plan and the schedule of “expenditures on average” submitted by the Respondent are undated and could have been created at any time. ...
2020-06-22 - Case Details
La Commission administrative note aussi qu’une recherche sur Google pour les termes “europ à rebrise plus” ne renvoie à aucun résultat autre que ceux qui font référence au nom de domaine . ...
2019-12-03 - Case Details
Supposing that Respondent was not aware of the possibility of searching trademarks online before registering a domain name, a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keywords CARREFOUR and CARREFOUR PASS demonstrates that all first results relate to Complainant’s products or news.
...
2019-11-28 - Case Details
The term “Wheelchair Cars” is a generic term reflecting the Registrant’s business which supplies mobility vehicles in Ireland. Google searches for “Wheelchair Cars Ireland” and “Wheelchair Cars” bring up thousands of results. The use of a common word as a domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services constitutes a legitimate interest.
...
2019-11-20 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names , , and (the “Domain Names”) are registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on October 8, 2019. ...
2019-12-09 - Case Details
Cualquier uso sin autorización que los Titulares hagan de las marcas o nombres comerciales de los Promoventes, o de cualquier término que fuese idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear confusión, es ilegítimo e infringe los derechos de propiedad intelectual de los Promoventes. Los resultados de búsquedas realizadas en Google y Wikipedia de “Ternium Hylsa” únicamente hacen referencia a los Promoventes.
Los Titulares no están utilizando y no han demostrado un interés en utilizar los nombres de dominio en disputa en relación con una oferta de buena fe de productos o servicios. ...
2020-01-13 - Case Details
The Scheme is widely referred to in literature accessible on the Internet. A "Google" search of the word "Cattlecare" combined with "Australia" produced over 250 hits relating to the Scheme (Complaint Exhibit G).
4.10 As with the Complaint, the Response is supported by an affidavit from an officer of the Respondent, Marie Curtis Keighley ("the Keighley Affidavit") and several exhibits thereto. ...
2002-02-12 - Case Details
Searches for the mark "EVAN-PICONE" on such widely used search engines as MSN, Alta Vista and Google revealed thousands of hits pertaining to the Complainant and on web sites based in various countries and appearing in languages including Spanish, Italian and Chinese, as well as English. ...
2002-01-10 - Case Details
Despite great efforts having been made by the Complainant to ascertain information about the Respondent, the Respondent has remained elusive. A search on the Google search engine, and searches in address and telephone databases, in both white and yellow pages, on the Internet yielded no result for the name "Simon Postles", the Respondent’s hotmail address or any company called "621086 BC Ltd.". ...
2002-04-12 - Case Details
Complainant has no
enforceable rights in its registered mark, because it is generic
("describes the essential feature of Complainant's service") and is
merely its address and thus not entitled to service mark protection under USPTO
Guidelines.[4] Respondents
identify eighteen pending United States trademark applications by parties
unaffiliated with Complainant, and a Google® search yielding 671,000 web pages,
in response to a search for the word classmates,
in support of their assertion that classmates
is generic and consequent argument that the Panel should accord Complainant no
rights in the word.
...
2002-10-03 - Case Details
Registrar Administrator Lew Blanck, Litige
OMPI No. D2000-0069; Google, Inc. v. wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh
Behain, Litige OMPI No. D2000-1240;
Microsoft Corporation v. ...
2003-02-04 - Case Details
The Panel was provided with copy of the printouts of the search results from
some of the most common search engines, Google, Virgilio and Yahoo. The Complainant
commented that the Respondent proved to be familiar with the use of Internet
since it has registered a domain name, and therefore a search in the above mentioned
search engines or any other similar search engine would have been absolutely
in the Respondent’s power.
...
2003-04-09 - Case Details
The First Respondent refers
here to the results of a Google search (not exhibited) that show that University
of Washington is number 1, while the University of Warsaw (Univwersytet Warszawski)
and University of Waterloo also feature in the top 5 (it is not stated where
the University of Wisconsin stands in this list).
3. ...
2003-01-17 - Case Details
In support of these various contentions, see the Whois searches giving details of domain names owned by the Complainant at Annex 5, the sample copies of business cards showing the Complainant’s use of the FNTELE name in its email addresses at Annex 6, the print-outs from the Complainant’s website at Annex 7, and the first three pages of results from a Google search against FNTELE at Annex 8 (all of the hits in these pages appear to refer to the Complainant). ...
2004-08-02 - Case Details
Furthermore, simple searches in a common search engine like Google, which is accessible for everyone and free of charge, revealed many hits mentioning the Thalys train and the services related to this train. ...
2004-06-02 - Case Details