That the domain names , , and ,
were ordered to be transferred to the Complainant pursuant to decisions rendered under the Policy.
That a Google search using the keywords “moulin rouge” indicates that the term is commonly associated
with the Complainant. ...
2025-10-02 - Case Details
That even in the implausible supposition that the Respondent was not aware of the Complainant, a simple
search via Google or any other search engine using the keywords “energizer” or “energizer holdings” would
have demonstrated the Complainant’s existence, activities, history, products, news and locations of official
distributors.
...
2025-01-13 - Case Details
The
Complainant submits that the VICTRON trademark is registered in many jurisdictions and is widely known
around the world and is inherently distinctive, without being descriptive or having a specific meaning. The
Complainant also submits that a Google search carried out on September 24, 2024, for the countries,
France, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, United States, United Kingdom, Slovakia and the Czech Republic
with the key word “victron” shows that all search results on the first page relate to the Complainant.
...
2024-12-03 - Case Details
Respondent sent an email communication to the Center on July 28, 2024, stating “Pode encerrar a disputa,
não tenho interesse no domínio” in Portuguese which according to Google Translate is the equivalent of
“You can close the dispute, I have no interest in the domain.”
...
2024-09-20 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names , , , and
are registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 20,
2022. ...
2022-11-30 - Case Details
The degree of
recognition and association of the words “Citius” and “CitiusTech” with Complainant is evidenced by a
Google search for “Citius/CitiusTech”, which reveals links predominantly to Complainant. Similar searches
on other search engines such as YAHOO and BING yield links to Complainant.
...
2023-01-19 - Case Details
The Complainant’s QATARENERGY trademark predates the registration date of the
disputed domain names, and all the top results for the term “Qatarenergy” into the Google search engine
refer to the Complainant. The fact that the disputed domain name was used as part
of a fraudulent scheme impersonating the Complainant shows the Respondents’ intent to target the
Complainant in bad faith at the time of registration of this disputed domain name.
...
2023-04-12 - Case Details
The Complainant goes on to say that:
“A basic search before any trademark database, including WIPO Global Brand Database, disclose a number
of live trademark registrations for marks comprising or including PLASTICOLA, dated years earlier than the
acquisition of the disputed domain name in various territories referable to the Complainant. Furthermore, a
Google search against the term PLASTICOLA produces numerous pages of results which appear to refer
page 3
exclusively to the Complainant and its products. ...
2023-08-30 - Case Details
In addition,
there is evidence of high recognition of its “Nreal” products in the online environment (Google and Bing
search results in Exhibit 9 of the Complaint and prizes awarded within the industry in Exhibit 10 of the
Complaint).
...
2023-08-23 - Case Details
Esta página web incluye en su encabezamiento la expresión “L’ARTISTA MELUCCI” y
contiene varios enlaces a redes sociales y a Google relativos a la Demandada.
5. Alegaciones de las Partes
A. Demandante
La Demandante sostiene en la Demanda:
El nombre de dominio en disputa reproduce en su integridad la marca BORBONE y el elemento distintivo de
la marca CAFFÈ BORBONE. ...
2023-03-29 - Case Details
The Respondent’s choice of the disputed domain name cannot have
been accidental and must have been influenced by the fame of the Complainant and its earlier trademarks.
Furthermore, a simple search on the Google search engine on “carrefour” and “carrefour carte cadeau”
shows top results only related to the Complainant, including its dedicated website
“www.cartecadeau.carrefour.fr”. ...
2023-03-27 - Case Details
- The Complainant contends that the trademark registrations of the Complainant pre-date the creation
date of the disputed domain name and that the trademark HALEON of the Complainant has acquired
substantial renown and popular search engines like Google list the Complainant’s brand and services
as the first result in respect of searches for “Haleon Global” and in this regard the panel takes note of
the documentary evidence annexed as part of Annexure 14 of the Complaint...
2024-02-21 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant’s trademark and its services
when it registered the disputed domain name. A simple search in a search engine such as Google or Bing
reveals many references to the Complainant already on the first two pages of such a search and would have
made the Respondent immediately aware of the Complainant. ...
2024-05-29 - Case Details
The Complainant
uploaded a Chinese version of its website on November 1, 2021. Google Analytics data provided by the
Complainant appears to show that its website received over 4 million visits, including over 170,000 visits
from China, during the period from August 2018 to August 2023.
...
2024-05-07 - Case Details
De hecho, el Demandante se conoce comúnmente en el tráfico económico
como “Notariado” y su página de referencia es . En las búsquedas en Google por “sede
electrónica notarial” y “portal notarial”, es la sede del Demandante que aparece, como referencia notarial
para los usuarios. ...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
According to the Respondent, one would have to be very specific in using the name “Mark Guagliardo” to generate any substantial results in a Google search.
The Respondent maintains that the Complainant currently has over 700 domain names registered in his name, and contends the Complainant is in violation of the U.S. ...
2018-01-19 - Case Details
Indeed, Exhibit 1 is a “The Globe & Mail” article entitled “RBX to launch robo-advisor business, will use own ETF”, which was already listed as the second Google search result in Annex 10 of the original Complaint, and therefore clearly in existence at that time, although it was not filed with the original Complaint. ...
2020-02-26 - Case Details
Que al ingresar el nombre del Titular “Sergio Monzón” junto con la marca AUTOPLAZA o AUTO-PLAZA en el motor de búsqueda Google, no hay resultados que indiquen relación alguna entre éste y la marca AUTOPLAZA.
Que, al realizar una búsqueda por titular de registros de marcas a través del sistema de libre acceso Marcanet, el único resultado que incluye el nombre “Sergio Monzón Serrano” como titular, es un registro No. 1359366 para la marca CLIENTO.
...
2020-02-25 - Case Details
The Complainant’s domain name would also have been disclosed in basic Google research by the Respondent. It is apparent the Respondent knowingly decided to register the Disputed Domain Name even though it would infringe such rights.
...
2020-02-20 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names , , , , and (the “Domain Names”) are registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on April 4, 2020. ...
2020-07-13 - Case Details