Sin embargo, la Demandada anunció en su página de Facebook que los nombres de dominio en disputa 1 y 2 serían reenviados al nombre de dominio en disputa 3, lo que demuestra que la Demandada era consciente de que sus actos eran reprensibles.
...
2020-08-03 - Case Details
The SUKIN trademark has been used by the Complainant on the domain names and since 2008 and the Facebook page “https://www.facebook.com/SukinNaturalSkincare” since September 2010.
The Disputed Domain Name was registered on August 14, 2017. ...
2021-03-08 - Case Details
Finalmente, el Experto concluye que el Demandado registró probablemente los nombres de dominios en disputa fundamentalmente con el fin de crear una confusión por asociación entre los nombre de dominio en disputa y la Demandante, pues como consta en el Anexo 10 de la Contestación de la Demanda, la marca DAVIPLATA de la Demandante, es entendida por los algoritmos de las redes sociales (Facebook® en este caso), como página relacionada. El hecho que los nombres de dominio en disputa no sean utilizados por el Demandado no impiden que el Experto concluya que el Demandado actuó de mala fe (ver la sección 3.3 de la Sinopsis elaborada por la OMPI 3.0).
...
2021-01-18 - Case Details
The Complainant’s mobile application has millions of downloads on Google Apps and App Store; the Complainant has more than 1 million followers on Facebook (Annex 7 to the Complaint). The Complainant’s VINTED Trademark is also a subject of many media publications (Annex 8 to the Complaint).
...
2020-09-25 - Case Details
The Respondent also maintains that 171 people use the word Spase with their Facebook handles.
The Respondent maintains that the use of a common word such as Spase constitutes use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services within the meaning of paragraph 4(c)(1) of the Policy, and refers generally to the use of other generic or descriptive words that appropriately may be used to generate advertising revenue. ...
2020-09-22 - Case Details
The Complainant has:
- 724,161 followers of the TURBOTAX Facebook site with 743,068 “likes”.
- Over 43,900 followers of the TURBOTAX Twitter profile.
- 132,000 subscribers of the TURBOTAX YouTube channel, with 1,830,494 views of the TurboTax 2020 commercial “From Home” video...
2020-09-01 - Case Details
Date
Classes
CANVA
Australia
1483138
29/03/2012
9
CANVA
United States of America
4316655
09/04/2013
42
CANVA
International
1204604
01/10/2013
9
CANVA PRINT
Australia
2004675
22/04/2019
40
CANVA
Brazil
914660462
30/04/2019
9
CANVA PRINT
United
Kingdom
UK00003396035
19/07/2019
40
CANVA PRINT
w/ logo
European Union
018042224
20/09/2019
40
CANVA PRINT
w/ logo
United States of America
6114099
28/07/2020
9, 42
Complainant uses the CANVA term as part of its brand logo, which is also registered as a trademark across various jurisdictions:
Complainant has established a strong social media presence and uses the CANVA mark to promote its services under this name, in particular on:
- Facebook: approximately 1.5 million likes
- Instagram: approximately 760 thousand followers
- Twitter: approximately 170 thousand followers
- Pinterest: approximately 160 thousand followers
Respondent registered the Domain Name on December 17, 2020, and it resolves to Respondent’s website, which purports to offer a pet portrait and related accessories printing service.
5. ...
2021-10-25 - Case Details
- The Complainant also claims to operate several social media platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter,
YouTube, etc. all of which enjoy a wide followership. Copies of the screenshots from the Complainant’s
social media platforms are annexed as Annexure O...
2022-06-29 - Case Details
Domain Administrator,
DomainMarket.com, WIPO Case No. D2019-0830 regarding ; Facebook Inc. v. Domain
Administrator, DomainMarket.com, WIPO Case No. D2020-1199 regarding ,
, , , ,
, and ; and Société Librairie Fernand Nathan – Fernand
Nathan & Cie v Domain Administrator, DomainMarket.com, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-06-08 - Case Details
For example, in 2020, the Complainant held 220 webinars under the ELIGIBILITY CENTER trademark with a total audience of more than 20,000 views;
- the Complainant’s ELIGIBILITY CENTER Facebook account has over 5,000 followers, the Complainant’s ELIGIBILITY CENTER Instagram page has over 7,000 followers, and the Complainant’s ELIGIBILITY CENTER Twitter page has almost 53,000 followers;
- the Complainant has invested heavily in marketing products and services under the ELIGIBILITY CENTER trademark, devoting hundreds of thousands of dollars to marketing the products and services through a variety of media, including but not limited to the Internet. ...
2022-02-15 - Case Details
According to said website, the Respondent has also published
a corresponding Facebook page, which he notes has reached over 149,600 people.
Both of the Parties insist that they have made efforts over a long period of time to resolve their dispute and
that each has made efforts to achieve an amicable settlement.
5. ...
2022-07-28 - Case Details
The footer of the webpage included links to the Respondent’s “Real Women Real Stories” YouTube account,
Facebook page, and Twitter account.
In December 2017, the Complainant commenced defamation proceedings against the Respondent in Israel
at least partly arising from the allegations made against the Complainant through the website to which the
disputed domain name resolves. ...
2023-02-03 - Case Details
According to the Complaint, the website also contained links to Facebook and Instagram pages for
“lofficielmontecarlo”. The Instagram page includes links to the celebrity interviews with images of the
celebrity superimposed over representations of the trademark below (also featuring the words “Monte Carlo”)
page 4
and a link to a “Linktree” page. ...
2023-03-24 - Case Details
在缺乏合理解释的情况下，专家组认为，被投诉人 2 不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因选
择并注册了争议域名，被投诉人 2 在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍注册争议域名
的行为具有恶意。Facebook, Inc. 诉 程飞婷，WIPO 案件编号 DCN2019-0002。
鉴于投诉人的商标在国际市场已广为人知，专家组很难想象被投诉人 2 出于善意使用目的而注册了争议域名
。...
2023-07-21 - Case Details
GQ confirmed in an
article from 2018 that “Converse All Stars are the world’s most popular sneaker”.
Complainant is also present on Facebook (46M followers); Instagram (10.8M followers); X (formerly Twitter)
(1M followers); and TikTok (946.9K followers).
...
2024-06-10 - Case Details
Para comprarlo pulse aquí”, íconos de diversas aplicaciones como Gmail, Facebook, TikTok, etc., aparentes
enlaces bajo diversos encabezados como “Música”, “Cine”, “Videojuegos”, “Teletexto”, “Utilidades”.
5. ...
2024-02-07 - Case Details
Leo van den Akker,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0020; o en el caso Facebook Inc. c. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006. Y en la misma línea se muestran los grupos de expertos que aplican la Política UDRP en la que se inspira el Reglamento (por ejemplo, casos Soria Natural, SA y Vicenc Roig Ribas, supra; Iberdrola SA v Astobiza Gracia, Francisco José,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2017-01-05 - Case Details
Leo van den Akker,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0020; o en el caso Facebook Inc. c. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006. Y en la misma línea se muestran los grupos de expertos que aplican la Política UDRP en la que se inspira el Reglamento (por ejemplo, casos Soria Natural, SA y Vicenc Roig Ribas,
Caso OMPI No. supra; Iberdrola SA v Astobiza Gracia, Francisco José,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2017-01-05 - Case Details
The Panel in Procedural Order No. 1 rejected Complainant’s request for the three-member Panel, indicating that it did so for the same reasons as are discussed in the Panel decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Amjad Abbas,
WIPO Case No. DME2010-0005.
The Complainant filed a Supplemental Statement on May 14, 2017. ...
2017-06-02 - Case Details
Complainant also has a strong presence online through social media including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
Respondent registered the Domain Names between November 1, 2016 and January 18, 2017. ...
2017-05-31 - Case Details