The NY Secretary of State database similarly shows
companies such as Dagi Pizza Inc., Dagi Management Corp., and Dagi Logistics Corp., along with additional
older and more recent registrations.
(9) Facebook shows numerous people named Dagi. LinkedIn shows numerous companies all over the world
other than the Complainant, such as Dagi Security & Consulting in Italy and Dagi Auto and Body Shop in
Texas. ...
2022-10-20 - Case Details
在缺乏合理解释的情况下，专家组认为，被投诉人不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因受让
了争议域名，被投诉人在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍受让争议域名的行为具有恶意。Facebook, Inc. 诉 程
飞婷，WIPO 案件编号 DCN2019-0002。被投诉人对争议域名的使用更是印证了其受让争议域名时知道投诉人
及其商标。
如上文提到的，根据投诉人提供的信息，争议域名曾指向一个位于“www.turnitin.com.cn”的网站，该网站在显
要位置使用了投诉人的注册商标TURNITIN 及图形商标，并称“本网站为 Turnitin唯一中文官方网站”，与事
实不符。...
2023-08-09 - Case Details
La Demandante ha dedicado una cantidad significativa de su tiempo, dinero y esfuerzo en la promoción de sus servicios en varios sitios de redes sociales como Facebook, Twitter, YouTube y otros, y ha desarrollado un número considerable de seguidores en cada sitio.
...
2018-08-03 - Case Details
Leo van den Akker,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0020 o Facebook Inc. c. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006. Y en la misma línea se muestran los grupos de expertos que aplican la Política UDRP en la que se inspira el Reglamento (por ejemplo, Iberdrola SA v Astobiza Gracia, Francisco José,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2018-05-16 - Case Details
在缺乏合理解释的情况下，专家组认为，被投诉人不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因选择并注册了争议域名，被投诉人在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍注册争议域名的行为具有恶意。Facebook, Inc. 诉程飞婷，WIPO案件编号DCN2019-0002。
鉴于投诉人的商标在中国市场已广为人知，专家组很难想象被投诉人出于善意使用目的而注册了这些争议域名。因此，虽然被投诉人所注册的争议域名一直处于消极持有状态，但这不妨碍专家组认定被投诉人恶意使用争议域名。...
2020-02-07 - Case Details
The website also contains
links to “Pierre Cardin MENA” or similarly-named profiles on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Snapchat,
Tiktok, etc., and does not target or mention Montenegro. The Complainant does not dispute that the
Respondent’s shipment restrictions have been consistently applied in practice and has not submitted any
evidence in support of its allegation that the Respondent is offering for sale counterfeit products or
impersonating the Complainant.
...
2025-09-22 - Case Details
A search on Google reveals that Complainant has a website at "www.docantle.net", as well as a Facebook page and Twitter feed, both listed under "Doc Antle". Complainant has held the domain name since 2009. ...
2014-12-24 - Case Details
One such link was “Yamil Rios → Domainshooter PREMIUM DOMAINS FOR SALE: Vanisha Mittal.com is For Sale ….” For more information, a visitor to the Facebook page was invited to contact an email address which was the same as that provided for the registrant in the Whois particulars for the domain name.
...
2010-08-12 - Case Details
Even if the Panel disagrees that the Complainant's common law rights had accrued at the date of registration, the Complainant asserts that even speculative registration is bad faith registration. See Facebook Inc. v. Privacy Ltd. Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT,
WIPO Case No. D2007 1193.
It says that the Respondent desired to disrupt the Complainant's business and to divert Internet traffic away from the Complainant's "www.xnxx.com" website when Internet users mistakenly arrived at it after searching for the term "xnxx" on an Internet search engine, and then profit when Internet users followed the links on its website. ...
2014-06-24 - Case Details
El Promovente realizó su primera publicación en la red social Facebook el 21 de septiembre de 2011, y en ese mismo mes se unió a la red social Twitter, habiendo promocionado su primer teléfono móvil en dichas redes sociales desde septiembre del 2011. ...
2015-08-24 - Case Details
As of today, Magic Men Live shows have occurred in over 155 cities throughout the United States and they have garnered over two million fans cumulatively across social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and Twitter.
When Respondent registered the Domain Name in 2015, Complainant was not making a similar use (i.e., live exotic male revue shows) of Magic Mike. ...
2020-06-23 - Case Details
Advance Chemill Systems,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0827; Facebook Inc. v. Privacy Ltd. Disclosed Agent for YOLAPT,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1193).
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s trade mark. ...
2008-08-04 - Case Details
The event caused 25 million visits to the Red Bull websites, over 267.000 Red Bull TV iOS app downloads. On Facebook and Twitter the jump generated 500.000 likes, 20.000 comments and 66.000 shares and 3.2 million tweets with official hashtags.
...
2014-10-28 - Case Details
El Promovente y las Firmas Miembro BDO han invertido importantes recursos para desarrollar una sólida presencia en línea y en especial a través de sus páginas en las distintas redes sociales, tales como Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter y YouTube.
El término BDO en relación con servicios financieros se asocia estrechamente con las Firmas Miembro BDO, y en México particularmente con Castillo Miranda, tal y como queda acreditado al ingresar BDO en el motor de búsqueda Google, donde los primeros resultados se refieren a “www.bdomexico.com” y la mayoría del resto de los resultados se refieren a otras Firmas Miembro BDO.
...
2014-12-22 - Case Details
This also results in a large number of visitors and followers on high traffic social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, with information regarding the SCOPUS database, and building in the SCOPUS mark a high brand recall.
...
2022-03-08 - Case Details
The “Johnson County, KS Government”, uses a “JOCO Kansas” word and
design (with sunflower) logo on its Facebook page that has 28,000 followers. Complainant also uses the
“JOCO Kansas” word and design logo in association with postings on X, and on a YouTube channel,
referring to itself as “Johnson County, Kan.” and “Johnson County, KS Government”, respectively. ...
2025-06-11 - Case Details
Photographs apparently related to the launch were posted on the Complainant’s “Facebook” page on August 30, 2015. An article dated August 27, 2015 indicates that “UnMail” was “earlier known as Octopus”.
...
2016-09-06 - Case Details
The inclusion of a hyphen in some of the domain names also does
not change the recognition that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s
MCDONALD’S Marks. See, e.g., Facebook, Inc. v. Ramunas Jonikas, WIPO Case No. D2018-1045
(inclusion of a hyphen “irrelevant” for purposes of the Policy)
Given Respondent’s historical pattern of abuse of Complainant’s MCD Mark in an email interception scheme
in the Prior Cases, the Panel considers it reasonable to infer that the variations represent intentional
reconfigurations of Complainant’s email extensions selected by Respondent as typical misspellings,
essentially typosquatting applied to Complainant’s MCD Mark centered email domain names, to be
considered further below. ...
2023-08-08 - Case Details
Complainant also has advertised its trademark and services on social media, most
extensively on Facebook.
The First Registrar Disputed Domain Names and Thirteenth Registrar Disputed Domain Name resolve to
websites which are, in appearance and structure, substantially similar and, in a number of instances,
identical to one another as “copycat” websites that reproduce Complainant’s CLARKS Mark and logo without
authorization and falsely purport to offer Complainant’s branded CLARKS Mark footwear and accessories to
the general public, including Complainant’s related trademark brands, e.g., DESERT BOOT (the “DESERT
BOOT Mark”) to impersonate Complainant (each a “Copycat Website” and collectively “Copycat Websites”),
except and both do not resolve to any active website; rather,
they are passively held.
...
2022-08-12 - Case Details
This work
included management of the brand across YouTube, Discord, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky,
X/Twitter, and TikTok for over two years. A few standout statistics are: Growth of a Discord server from
14,000 to over 100,000 members; More than 1.5 million organic YouTube views; Quadrupling (or better)
engagement on all social platforms.” ...
2025-12-05 - Case Details