The Complainant asserted that the Respondent’s affiliate has been the respondent to nine previous actions under the Policy filed with the Center, and in each action the outcome was an order for transfer of the domain name in issue to the complainant: Facebook, Inc. v, Domain Asset Holdings,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0516; Training Channel, S.A. v. Domain Asset Holdings,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-25 - Case Details
According to Complainants, Respondent also created a post on its Facebook page linking to the disputed domain name in connection with further political commentary concerning the issue of gun control in the United States. ...
2018-08-16 - Case Details
En cuarto lugar, y de manera adicional a todo lo anterior, hay que tener en cuenta que el hecho de que la Demandada no haya contestado a la Demanda puede ser interpretado como un indicio más de su mala fe, tal y como se hace en múltiples decisiones emitidas por expertos en aplicación del Reglamento, como las de los casos Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006; Compagnie Gervais Danone SA v. José Gregorio Hernández Quintero,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-03-29 - Case Details
Halton on his social media site (this is identified more precisely in the Response as Mr. Halton’s Facebook page). The Respondent rejects the significance of an online posting by “Andy Halton” about a Warburton ancestor, noting more than 180 listings of Haltons with similar names. ...
2019-03-18 - Case Details
Burgess called the Complainant a “fraud” on the Complainant’s Facebook page and used Twitter to characterize the Complainant’s YBOP brand as signifying “Your Brain On Pseudoscience”. ...
2019-09-13 - Case Details
Finally, the Second Respondent points out that in one month of operation (November 2019) his website reached 2.6 million people around the world with more than 1.3 million people actively engaging with his company’s social media presence. This contrasts with the Complainant’s Facebook engagement number in the same period of only 8,400.
One might expect that the entity appointed as the official news agency for the papal visit to Thailand would attract a very high level of attention, particularly during and in anticipation of that visit. ...
2020-01-13 - Case Details
See, AT&T Corp. v. Randy Thompson,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0830; Facebook Inc. v. Jeremy Williams, 3 Man Group,
WIPO Case No. D2019-1535.
Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove, each of the following three elements required under by a preponderance of evidence:
i. the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
ii. the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
iii. the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2020-01-06 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that it has a strong, established web presence and directly interacts with its cutomers through its websites established at its two Internet domain names at and as well as its Facebook page. Through such forums the Complainant promotes its goods and services, offers various informational packets and a DVD relating to its services, allows patients to schedule appointments, and learn more about the Complainant’s doctors and staff.
...
2012-07-27 - Case Details
Its products are distributed through its website “www.cydia.saurik.com” and are promoted on Facebook and Twitter.
The Respondent holds about 45,000 domain names. It registered the disputed domain name on December 12, 2002. ...
2011-03-08 - Case Details
The websites also feature the image and logo of the Complainant. On each website, the “I like” button from Facebook for Iberostars vacations appears.
The websites operated by the Respondent offer Internet users the possibility of discounted online bookings at the Complainant’s hotels and resorts. ...
2011-09-01 - Case Details
Leo van den Akker,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0020; o en el caso Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006. Y en la misma línea se muestran los expertos que aplican la UDRP, en la que se inspira el Reglamento (por ejemplo, casos Soria Natural, SA y Vicenc Roig Ribas,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2010-06-21 - Case Details
One such link was “Yamil Rios → Domainshooter PREMIUM DOMAINS FOR SALE: Vanisha Mittal.com is For Sale ….” For more information, a visitor to the Facebook page was invited to contact an email address which was the same as that provided for the registrant in the Whois particulars for the Domain Name.
...
2010-08-13 - Case Details
The Complainant has featured heavily in the press including features and advertising in the Irish Daily Mirror in 2010.
The Complainant has some 227,000 friends on Facebook and 32,000 followers on Twitter.
The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's protected identifier ASOS. ...
2010-07-12 - Case Details
Leo van den Akker,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0020; o en el caso Facebook Inc. v. Usta Cafer,
Caso OMPI No. DES2009-0006, Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria (A.E.A.T.) v. ...
2012-05-21 - Case Details
因此，专家组认为，被投诉人取得争议域名时知道投诉人及其商标，被投诉人在明知投诉人及
其商标的情况下仍受让取得争议域名的行为具有恶意。Facebook, Inc. 诉 程飞婷，WIPO 案件编号 DCN2019-
0002。
另外，如上文提到的，根据投诉人提供的信息，争议域名曾指向的网站在显要位置使用了投诉人的文字及图形
注册商标及投诉人官方网站的设计内容。...
2024-07-11 - Case Details
The second Complainant is also the owner of the domain name , registered since
October 9, 1997, which it uses in connection with its official website. Furthermore, the Atacadão S.A.
Facebook page has more than three million followers and ‘likes’ respectively. The ATACADÃO mark
features in official rankings, among which are the “biggest Brazil brands”, and the “best Latin America
brands” (evidence provided).
...
2025-03-25 - Case Details
La marca DICK’S
SPORTING GOODS también está activa a través de páginas dedicadas en las diferentes redes sociales
disponibles en todo el mundo, incluyendo Facebook, Twitter/X, You Tube, Pinterest e Instagram.
El 14 de diciembre de 2022 la Promovente solicitó ante el IMPI el registro de DICK’S SPORTING GOODS
como marca figurativa en las clases 18, 25, 28, y 35. ...
2026-02-20 - Case Details
As of the date the Complaint was filed, the Complainant has over 1 million registered customers, and its
e-commerce sites receive on average more than 4 million visits per month. It also has over 370,000 fans on Facebook, 50,000 followers on Twitter, and 22,000 followers on Instagram.
To attain this growth and level of sales and customers, the Complainant has undertaken comprehensive marketing campaigns across the world including, e.g., bill board and television advertisements in the United Kingdom, Australia and United States, and has also sponsored high-profile fashion and music events around the world, including, e.g., the Manchester Fashion Week and the Coachella Music Festival in California.
...
2013-06-27 - Case Details
The Complainant has registered, directly or through affiliated companies, over 400 domain names identical to or comprising the GILLETTE trademark, and has a strong online presence through Facebook and Twitter. The Complainant’s principal website regarding the GILLETTE brand, where products are advertised and offered for sale, is located at ‘’www.gillette.com’’. ...
2013-05-02 - Case Details
Agregan que los nombres de dominio en disputa tienen dirección IP localizada en Argentina, y que los mismos dirigen al sitio Web del titular real, “www.facilacceso.com”, redactado en castellano. Aducen finalmente que la página de Facebook de “Fácil Acceso”, una empresa cuyo titular es el Demandado, Martin Zanlongo, también está en castellano, así como la publicidad gráfica que realiza. ...
2015-03-04 - Case Details