About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 61353   document(s)s (0.129 sec)

Rows

<<  <  57941 - 57960  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-0089 for goldeuromillions.com html (22 KB)

The Respondent is Oleksii Kovalskyi, Afesto H.E.Ltd, Ukraine. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant asserts that the Domain Name is not used in connection with bona fide offering of goods or services, nor does it constitute a legitimate non-commercial fair use of the Domain Name. ...

2020-04-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0672 for porsche-allemagne.com, porsche-italie.com html (13 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...Many UDRP decisions have found that a domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant's trademark where the domain name incorporates the trademark in its entirety. ...

2014-06-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-5267 for assicura-unipolsai.com pdf (147 KB)

The Respondent is Tiziana Murado, Italy. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1775 for technogymcn.com html (21 KB)

The Respondent is Zhang Juan of Beijing, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Xiamen Nawang Technology Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2017-11-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2515 for build-a-bear.online pdf (99 KB)

The Respondent is Herr Norbert Kurzmeier, KUNO GmbH, Germany. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”). 3. ...By registering a domain name that comprises the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, the Respondent has created a domain name that is identical to the Complainant’s trademark, as well as its domain name. ...

2023-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2494 for redsbet.com html (18 KB)

The Respondent is Sondre Sagstuen, Rush Partners Ltd of London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”), represented by Rush Partners Ltd., United Kingdom. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domeneshop AS dba domainnameshop.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2018-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1077 for noprescriptionaccutane.com html (18 KB)

Respondent is Ruler-Domains, Sergey Ryabov of Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom. 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2010-09-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0372 for daytondailynew.com html (22 KB)

The Respondent is PabloPalermao, San Isidro, Peru.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC.   3. ...The difference between this trademark and the disputed domain name is merely the removal in the disputed domain name of the letter “s” and the addition of “.com”. ...

2008-06-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0020 for crazyskates.com html (18 KB)

The Respondent is Cha Baekjin of Busan, Republic of Korea, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...

2018-03-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1464 for montagebrickell.com, montageflorida.com html (17 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Discussion and Findings Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy states that the domain name holder is to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding in the event that a third party (complainant) asserts to an ICANN-approved dispute resolution service provider that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the domain name holder has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2015-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-5250 for mbcvia.com pdf (186 KB)

The Respondent is Rachid Elkezazi, Morocco. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainants' official website is located at the domain name , registered in 2001. The disputed domain name was registered on December 29, 2021. ...

2024-02-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0135 for virginfoundation.info, virginfoundation.social html (11 KB)

The Respondent is William James of Buffalo, New York, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Names and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with TLDS L.L.C. d/b/a SRSPlus. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2018-04-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4673 for maxfactorchina.com pdf (413 KB)

The Respondent is wei zhang, hope, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Network 3. ...The Domain Name was registered on January 21, 2014. When the Complainant became aware of the Domain Name, it was redirected to a webpage, where the Domain Name was offered for sale without specifying the consideration of interest. ...

2023-02-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAE2017-0005 for gallowayacoustics.ae html (15 KB)

The Respondent is Husain Bhabhrawala of Dahod, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA). 3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered in order to prevent the Complainant reflecting the GALLOWAY ACOUSTICS trademark in a corresponding domain name. ...

2017-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1983 for kibrisvogue.com, kibrisvoguemagazin.com html (15 KB)

The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on December 2, 2013, in which the disputed domain name was added. On December 2, 2013, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name . On December 3, 2013, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details disputed domain name . The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2014-02-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-4055 for sniffmap.app html (16 KB)

The Respondent is See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States / Serghei Scelcunov, Republic of Moldova. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2022-02-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3273 for celestino.com html (16 KB)

A.R.L.P.A., Italy (hereinafter, “Respondent”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Corehub S.R.L. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Beginning in 2015, Complainants felt a need to acquire the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name had been registered by Respondent, the Consorzio Celestiano S. Coop. a.r.l.p.a., on December 2, 1997. ...

2021-02-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0142 for net2phone.info html (17 KB)

The Respondent is WorldCall, based at 10 College Terrace, suite 50, London, United Kingdom.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name at issue is ("the Domain Name"). The Domain Name is registered with Domain Registration Services d/b/a dotEarth, based at P.O. ...When using the Domain Name one is immediately linked to the WorldCall website which is the result of this Domain Name being used as a metatag in Respondent's website. ...

2002-06-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0585 for ringcrowncap.com html (20 KB)

The Respondent is Nexperian Holding Limited ("Nexperian") of Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China / li zai hui of Fuzhou, Fujian, China, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name ) the (the "Domain Name") is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. ...The registration of the Domain Name and the second domain name together with the attempt to sell the Domain Name for a sum far in excess of its out-of pocket costs relating to the Domain Name is bad faith under paragraph 4(b)(i). ...

2018-06-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0613 for draftcoin.com html (17 KB)

The Respondent is Brian Boyer of Mesa, Arizona, United States of America ("United States"), self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark. The Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...

2018-06-08 - Case Details