The Respondent is Oleksii Kovalskyi, Afesto H.E.Ltd, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant asserts that the Domain Name is not used in connection with bona fide offering of goods or services, nor does it constitute a legitimate non-commercial fair use of the Domain Name.
...
2020-04-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Many UDRP decisions have found that a domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant's trademark where the domain name incorporates the trademark in its entirety. ...
2014-06-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tiziana Murado, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhang Juan of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xiamen Nawang Technology Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-11-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Herr Norbert Kurzmeier, KUNO GmbH, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...By registering a
domain name that comprises the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety, the Respondent has created a
domain name that is identical to the Complainant’s trademark, as well as its domain
name. ...
2023-08-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sondre Sagstuen, Rush Partners Ltd of London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”), represented by Rush Partners Ltd., United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domeneshop AS dba domainnameshop.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-12-19 - Case Details
Respondent is Ruler-Domains, Sergey Ryabov of Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is PabloPalermao, San Isidro, Peru.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC.
3. ...The difference between this trademark and the disputed domain name is merely the removal in the disputed domain name of the letter “s” and the addition of “.com”. ...
2008-06-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cha Baekjin of Busan, Republic of Korea, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2018-03-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy states that the domain name holder is to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding in the event that a third party (complainant) asserts to an ICANN-approved dispute resolution service provider that:
(i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and
(ii) the domain name holder has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2015-10-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rachid Elkezazi, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainants' official website is located at the domain name , registered in 2001.
The disputed domain name was registered on December 29, 2021. ...
2024-02-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is William James of Buffalo, New York, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TLDS L.L.C. d/b/a SRSPlus. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is wei zhang, hope, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Network
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on January 21, 2014. When the Complainant became aware of the
Domain Name, it was redirected to a webpage, where the Domain Name was offered for sale without
specifying the consideration of interest. ...
2023-02-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Husain Bhabhrawala of Dahod, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered in order to prevent the Complainant reflecting the GALLOWAY ACOUSTICS trademark in a corresponding domain name. ...
2017-11-14 - Case Details
The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on December 2, 2013, in which the disputed domain name was added. On December 2, 2013, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name . On December 3, 2013, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming that the Respondent is listed as the registrant and providing the contact details disputed domain name .
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-02-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States / Serghei Scelcunov, Republic of Moldova.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-02-02 - Case Details
A.R.L.P.A., Italy (hereinafter, “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Corehub S.R.L. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Beginning in 2015, Complainants felt a need to acquire the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name had been registered by Respondent, the Consorzio Celestiano S. Coop. a.r.l.p.a., on December 2, 1997. ...
2021-02-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is WorldCall, based at 10 College Terrace, suite 50,
London, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is ("the Domain Name").
The Domain Name is registered with Domain Registration Services d/b/a dotEarth,
based at P.O. ...When using
the Domain Name one is immediately linked to the WorldCall website which
is the result of this Domain Name being used as a metatag in Respondent's
website. ...
2002-06-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nexperian Holding Limited ("Nexperian") of Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China / li zai hui of Fuzhou, Fujian, China, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ) the (the "Domain Name") is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. ...The registration of the Domain Name and the second domain name together with the attempt to sell the Domain Name for a sum far in excess of its out-of pocket costs relating to the Domain Name is bad faith under paragraph 4(b)(i). ...
2018-06-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Brian Boyer of Mesa, Arizona, United States of America ("United States"), self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark.
The Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2018-06-08 - Case Details