The Respondent is Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bhanu Yadav, Haemonetics.com, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”)1.
3. ...The Complainant also
contends that the disputed domain name constitutes typosquatting, and that there is no website accessible
from the disputed domain name, both of which indicate bad faith. ...
2023-10-27 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
page 2
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant contends that there should be consolidation of the Respondents in the present proceeding,
for several reasons, including in particular the following:
(i) each of the disputed domain names was registered on the same date;
(ii) seven of the disputed domain names were registered with the same Registrar;
(iii) each of the disputed domain names is associated with the same server and IP address;
(iv) each of the disputed domain names uses the same naming convention, namely, the Trade Mark plus
a misspelling of “securities settlement”;
(v) each of the disputed domain names was registered one day after the Settlement Domain Name was
registered.
...
2023-01-12 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp.
...The disputed domain name was registered on May 19, 2021. The disputed domain name was registered on May 26, 2021. ...
2021-12-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Confusing similarity has been found by other Panels in similar circumstances.
See, e.g., Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. v. Marcellod Russo,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1049 (WIPO November
22, 2001) (finding the domain name confusingly similar
to Complainant’s VOGUE mark); Yahoo! ...
2002-12-23 - Case Details
See WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.11 and, for example, The Curators of the University of Missouri v. Pamela Holley, MU Healthcare Victims,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2693. In this dispute, the Complaint was filed six years after the date of registration of the disputed domain name.
...“Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” is defined in paragraph 1 of the Rules as “using the UDRP in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name.”
...
2021-01-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints (hereafter the "Complaint") satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy enumerates several ways in which a respondent may demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a domain name:
"Any of the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the panel to be proved based on its evaluation of all evidence presented, shall demonstrate your rights or legitimate interests to the domain name for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(ii):
(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue."
...
2018-10-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is BMR Securities Pty Limited of Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("Domain Name") is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...As the Domain Name reproduces the GOGO Mark in its entirety the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the GOGO Mark. ...
2017-12-19 - Case Details
The trade mark is the distinctive and memorable part of the disputed domain name and the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark.
...The Panel finds on balance that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith pursuant to paragraph 4(b)(i). The disputed domain name incorporates a widely-known trade mark. ...
2016-11-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lonzo Harden, Bella MarathonChoice, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-11-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Joe Kreg of Istanbul, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See section 3.3 of WIPO Overview 3.0 and Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
Clearly, considering the nature of the disputed domain name, the Respondent has registered the disputed domain intentionally to create a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s widely used mark as to the relation between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2019-01-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Josh Shampo, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to historical WHOIS data, the disputed domain name was originally registered on June 4, 2004 by
Complainant. Complainant owned the disputed domain name for nineteen years. ...
2024-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is 1&1 Internet Limited, United Kingdom / Lewis Dale, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2022-01-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / Jason Douglas, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2021-05-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Umer Khokhar, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA).
3. ...The Respondent argued the Complainants’ products were bought to an authorized distributor and claims that it has a legitimate right to register the Disputed Domain Name. In this regard, the Panel is of the idea that the Respondent’s use of the Disputed Domain Name does not fulfill the requirements in Oki Data test (see: Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2020-12-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Powell Will, PowellWill, United States of America (“United States” or “U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Metaregistrar BV (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The inclusion of the word “america” in the disputed domain name
does not exclude the likelihood of confusion between the SANOFI trademark and the disputed domain
name.
...
2026-01-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is wang yi, Serbia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The composition of the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation. By offering competing
cloud computing services the web site attached to the disputed domain name was confusing. ...
2025-07-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is NAN XIAO, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Date: November 12, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Philip Morris Products S.A. v. NAN XIAO
Case No. D2024-3846
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
5. ...
2024-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kimberly Vandersypen, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Cooper Wilson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
/Angela Fox/
Angela Fox
Sole Panelist
Date: May 10, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Factoring Express LLC v. ...
2023-05-19 - Case Details