About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58600   document(s)s (0.105 sec)

Rows

<<  <  36181 - 36200  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0754 for lnstagrám.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent is Whois Agent, Domain Protection Services, Inc., United States / Ahmad Butto, Israel. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name [] (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...See, for instance, Württembergische Versicherung AG v. Emir Ulu, WIPO Case No. D2006-0278 (finding that the domain name should be considered as equivalent to ”). 5. ...

2021-05-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1029 for carlosmortensen.net, erica-schoenberg.com, ericaschoenberg.com, miamijohncernuto.com, pascalperrault.com, teamfulltilt.net, teamfulltiltpoker.net html (33 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the UDRP, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The Domain Name is therefore effectively identical to the mark CARLOS MORTENSEN; the Domain Names and are effectively identical to the mark ERICA SCHOENBERg; the Domain Name is effectively identical to the mark MIAMI JOHN CERNUTO; and the Domain Name is effectively identical to the mark PASCAL PERRAULT. ...

2010-10-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2254 for litthings.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is East Softwear of Lahore, Pakistan. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the "Registrar"). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...

2017-01-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4513 for teflontrucking.com pdf (141 KB)

Respondent is Elford Jarrett, Teflon Trucking LLC, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Discussion and Findings Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...

2023-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1803 for deepjudge.net pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Joaquim Ribeiro, Portugal. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Nicenic International Group Co., Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2025-07-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3149 for gearerospaces.com pdf (140 KB)

Respondent is kreardon james, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the textual element of the GE AEROSPACE mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-09-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0918 for efgbanking.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Matt Russell, EFG Lux, India. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The disputed domain name redirects to the Complainant’s website. The Respondent is deceiving users into believing that the disputed domain name is the website of the Complainant. ...

2024-05-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1891 for goldengooseoutlet.net html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Martin Lee of Parsippany, New Jersey, United States of America (“United States”). 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2017-11-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2767 for valeroca.com pdf (194 KB)

Respondent is Kavita Malviya, Canada. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger, UAB (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant also claims that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, as Respondent has never been commonly known by the Domain Name, has not used or made demonstrable preparations to use the Domain Name, nor is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name without intent for commercial gain. ...

2022-10-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4280 for iranlcw.com pdf (158 KB)

The Respondent is Muhammet Turabi, Türkiye. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisf ied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2023-12-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0723 for metrx.org html (11 KB)

Respondent is ctdlabs, Texas, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. 3. ...Additionally, many UDRP panels have held that the elimination of a hyphen in a domain name cannot avoid confusing similarity. The disputed domain name thus is identical to Complainant’s mark. ...

2011-07-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2634 for santa-toeic.co, santa-toeic.com, santafortoeic.com, santatoeic.co, santatoeic.com html (25 KB)

The disputed domain names (“the fourth disputed domain name”) and (“the fifth disputed domain name”) are registered with CCI REG S.A. ...The Respondent has not used or made any demonstrable preparations to use certain of the disputed domain names in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services. The passive holding of a domain name does not amount to use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services; see Société nationale des télécommunications: Tunisie Telecom v. ...

2021-01-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0586 for carvanacar.com pdf (130 KB)

The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant. /Kathryn Lee/ Kathryn Lee Sole Panelist Date: April 29, 2022 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Carvana, LLC v. ...

2022-05-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2875 for amalgamatedbank.org html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Muslum Degin of Bursa, Turkey, self-represented. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...v) The Respondent’s contention that it registered the disputed domain name with the intention to install a system to earn forex money is not credible. ...

2019-02-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1196 for hydrobolt.com html (12 KB)

The Respondent is Billington Bolt, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Easyspace.   3. ...The Respondent’s bad faith is further demonstrated by its inaction, its passive holding of the domain name to the exclusion of the Complainant. Since registration of the domain name in issue, the domain name has directed users to a website advertising the services of the registrar with which the domain name in issue is registered. ...

2008-10-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1968 for amadeus.name pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is kevin Liu, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-07-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4620 for mgm-osaka.com pdf (140 KB)

Respondent is Laurence Bartell, Sustin Bartell Waldman & Fitzgerald, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (“Registrar”). 3. ...One of Complainant’s subsidiaries registered the domain name in 2014. The disputed domain name was created on May 1, 2019. At the time the Complaint was filed, it resolved to a page on the Registrar’s website that indicated that the disputed domain name was available for sale and led to another page listing the disputed domain name for sale for USD 50,000. ...

2025-01-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2760 for newmarkppc.com pdf (136 KB)

Respondent is Pham Van Thai, EXIT Realty, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant uses its website and emails associated with the domain name to communicate with customers and business partners. The disputed domain name was registered on July 1, 2025. ...

2025-09-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4255 for myadmadvantage.com pdf (183 KB)

The Respondent is Victoria John, Nigeria. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name was used to impersonate the Complainant. ...

2025-11-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1740 for hmrconlineuk.com pdf (139 KB)

The Respondent is Melvin Bennett, UK. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the HMRC mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-06-26 - Case Details