Respondent is Rohit Jain, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of India who registered the disputed domain name on December 6, 2022. By the time of rendering this decision, the disputed domain name resolves to a ...
...
2023-02-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Armel Dupont, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is (i) confusingly similar to its earlier trademarks, (ii)
that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and (iii) that the
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2023-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mark Roxberry, Drive Technology, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Respondent also
asserts that Complainant is engaged in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
6. Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2023-07-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is lin lin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Commerce
Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on January 5, 2024. The Domain Name resolves to a website which
supposedly offers skincare, cosmetics and make-up products under the trademark CLARINS (the Domain
Name Website).
5. ...
2024-03-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims the transfer of the disputed domain name on the grounds that:
- the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights;
- the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the disputed domain name; and
- the dispute domain name has been registered and used in bad faith.
...
2020-06-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In cases where the disputed domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the disputed domain name, the disputed domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing.
...
2021-10-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Luigi Corsetti, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Soluciones Corporativas IP, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Furthermore, the disputed domain name was initially used to redirect Internet visitors from the domain name . This domain name was reassigned to the Complainant on December 21, 2020, following a “.it” ADR proceeding.
...
2021-08-03 - Case Details
Respondent is Tim Parsons, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of the United States who registered the disputed domain name on October 28, 2019. ...
2020-02-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhen Rong Li, Li Zhen Rong of Xiamen, Fujian, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <索菲特娱乐城.com> is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...The disputed domain name resolves to a gambling page displaying commercial links.
The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2018-09-18 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar
UDRP panels have consistently held that domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trade mark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (See Magnum Piering, Inc. v. ...Wilson, Sr.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1525; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Richard MacLeod d/b/a For Sale,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0662)
In the present case, the disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark P90X. ...
2011-02-14 - Case Details
Respondent is eric mikovich, cushman wakef ield, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends Respondent is not commonly known as by the disputed domain name
and is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name because the only
evidence of Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name are attempts to defraud potential employees of
Complainant.
...
2025-09-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Koen Berghe, Belgium.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger
Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Sole Panelist
Date: December 6, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Carrefour SA v. Koen Berghe
Case No. D2024-4023
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-12-13 - Case Details
Carpenter, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Tu Ng, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Sarek Oy (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Domain Name be transferred to Complainant.
/Robert A. Badgley/
Robert A. Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: June 5, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. ...
2023-06-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Loren Shook, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Musa Kaya of Merkez, Turkey, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name given that:
(i) the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant in any way, not having the Complainant authorized the Respondent to use and register its trademarks or to seek the registration of the disputed domain name;
(ii) the Respondent does not have rights over the CALVIN KLEIN trademark which is a famous and well-known mark in use for more than 50 years prior to the registration of the disputed domain name;
(iii) the Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name;
(iv) the Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services or in a legitimate noncommercial or fair way;
(v) there is no credible evidence or no credible legitimate basis on which the Respondent is or could be making any legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2017-12-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liu Fen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It is found, accordingly, that the
Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith.
With regard to the requirement that the Respondent is using the disputed domain name in bad faith, the fact
that the Respondent is offering the disputed domain name for sale shows the Respondent’s use of the
disputed domain name in bad faith. ...
2023-05-25 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2021-03-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Panel notes that, for the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy, paragraph 4(b) of the Policy
establishes circumstances, in particular, but without limitation, that, if found by the Panel to be present, shall
be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith.
Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy sets out a list of non-exhaustive circumstances that may indicate that a domain
name was registered and used in bad faith, but other circumstances may be relevant in assessing whether a
respondent’s registration and use of a domain name is in bad faith. ...
2025-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vladimir Zozulia, Xado Ltd, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Vincent Denoyelle/
Vincent Denoyelle
Sole Panelist
Date: September 22, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ADDINOL Lube Oil GmbH v. Vladimir Zozulia, Xado Ltd
Case No. D2025-3127
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-09-26 - Case Details