The Respondent is Wis INC, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights, nor legitimate interests in the domain name . Accordingly, the Respondent has no rights on SODEXO as corporate name, trade name, shop sign, mark or domain name that would be prior to the Complainant’s rights.
...
2019-10-31 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...None of the disputed domain names are currently linked to any active website. However, the Complainant
brought evidence that the disputed domain name was recently hosting a cryptocurrency
site and that the Respondent has configured an email server on the disputed domain name
. ...
2026-01-16 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Fabulous.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...When first contacted, the Respondent said that the disputed domain name was not for sale. He then tried to sell the disputed domain name to the Complainant for EUR 80,000.
...
2015-03-25 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name does not resolve to any
active website (Annex 9 of the Complaint).
5. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
However, the Respondent started his real estate business using the disputed domain name in September 2011, fully aware of the Complainant’s domain name.
Prior to September 2011, the Respondent had not used the disputed domain name for his real estate business, and therefore his business was not known or affiliated with the disputed domain name. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s domain name, except for the re-ordering of the words.
The Respondent was aware, or should have been aware of the existence of the Complainant’s domain name and the similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s domain name, but proceeded to register and use the disputed domain name for his real estate business.
...
2011-12-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Giovanni Cagnoli, PALADIN PHARMA SPA, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Lothian
Sole Panelist
Date: May 1, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Paladin Labs, Inc. v. Giovanni Cagnoli, PALADIN PHARMA SPA
Case No. D2024-1044
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-05-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Averitt Container, AVERITT CONTAINER, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...In addition,
the MX record for the disputed domain name indicates that the Respondent may be using the disputed
domain name for sending fraudulent emails.
...
2025-05-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is group no, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fares Kamil, Egypt.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Khaled Abdeljaber, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the .IO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for .IO Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .IO Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-09-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Reda FETTAH, Petroleum Africa, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to Complainant, Respondent is not authorized by
Complainant to use the ADBLUE mark in a domain name or otherwise.
The Domain Name was registered on April 4, 2016. The Domain Name resolves to a website offering urea
solutions for the purposes of reducing the NOx emissions in vehicles and engines.
...
2024-07-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Given the high similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s official domain name,
there’s a possibility for phishing or other illegitimate activity.
...
2024-06-11 - Case Details
Customer 1244065242, Canada / Michelle Chung, Chung Limited Co, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Accordingly, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its ALSTOM mark.
The Complainant notes that it wrote on at least two occasions to the Respondent to request the real identity of the owner of the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name be suspended. ...
2019-12-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Mohd Uddin, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...It is the general view among UDRP panels that the addition of merely dictionary, descriptive or geographical words to a trademark in a domain name is normally insufficient in itself to avoid a finding of confusing similarity under the first element of the UDRP (for example, Ansell Healthcare Products Inc. v. ...
2019-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Services Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Megan Scott, United
States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be cancelled.
/Kathryn Lee/
Kathryn Lee
Sole Panelist
Date: August 18, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Fenix International Limited v. ...
2022-09-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Joseph Maduabuchi, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gandi SAS (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Furthermore, the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s domain name
.
The Complainant further submits that the Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the
disputed domain name. ...
2023-02-02 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent is apparently an individual resident in Ukraine.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on August 13, 2019.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was previously resolved to an English language website offering dating and
matchmaking services (the “Website”). ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: November 4, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dream Marriage Group, Inc. v. Digital Privacy Corporation / Alexander Dmytriiev
Case No. D2022-3102
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-11-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is kari butke, Algeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited dba
WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark,
as well as is identical to its prior domain name, only differing by the extension.
...
2023-01-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mark Benode, Switzerland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...Inter alia, the Complainant is the owner of the domain name carrefour.com, re...
The disputed domain name was registered on November 21, 2022.
...
2023-03-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ju Ji, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-05-17 - Case Details