ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
CKE Restaurants, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc
Case No. D2024-1712
1. The Parties
Complainant is CKE Restaurants, Inc., United States of America (“United States”), represented by
Brand Enforcement Team 101 Domain, United States.
...Sole Panelist
Date: June 25, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
CKE Restaurants, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc
Case No. D2024-1712
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Ecommerce, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Furthermore, the disputed domain name used to contain a button with the text “Want To Secure This
domain? – Click Here”. When clicking the button Internet users were redirected to a website where the
disputed domain name was listed for sale for USD 4,999, with instructions to email the Respondent if
interested in purchasing the disputed domain name. ...
2024-09-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...The fact that the Domain Name is presently inactive does not
prevent a finding of bad faith. As such the Panel finds that the Domain Name has and is being used in bad
faith.
...
2023-07-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pascal Flamur Musaj, Switzerland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainants contend that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Trademarks of the Complainants, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name,
and the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2024-11-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Rafael Ortega, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Such use continues to this date. Respondent has also set up the disputed domain name for email use.
Complainant's representative sent a demand letter regarding the disputed domain name on November 15,
2024, through the privacy service used for the disputed domain name. ...
2025-03-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is paul kolo, henrymax steel company, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-
Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer
of the disputed domain name.
Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its earlier
trademarks, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and that
the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2024-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tayim Henri Priso, Cameroon.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-05-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules and with the Complainant’s request, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Debrett G. Lyons
Sole Panelist
Date: June 8, 2015
1 See, Do The Hustle, LLC v. ...
2015-06-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Diego Hare, Peru.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dreamscape Networks International Pte Ltd
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on February 1, 2020. The disputed domain name resolves to a
website which appears to be marketing clothes manufactured by the Complainant. ...
2023-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is blog hellboy, blogger, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Lundbeck A/S v. blog hellboy, blogger
Case No. D2024-3494
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-10-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vyacheslav Malevich of Bobrujsk, Belarus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Center of Ukrainian Internet Names (Ukrnames).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-09-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Russell Boyd a United States citizen with a mailing address 189 Carter Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . The registrar is Network Solutions, Inc. ...Decision
The Panel concludes (a) that the domain name is identical to Complainant’s common law trademark in her name "Julia Roberts," (b) that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the domain name and (c) that Respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith. ...
2000-05-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Leon Manders, Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name nor does the Respondent have any authorization from the Complainant to register the Domain Name. ...
2021-06-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is JoliMari of New York, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with DomainContext, Inc. ...The use of the Domain Name for a forwarding address of a for-profit online pharmacy can be use in bad faith. Pfizer Inc. v. jg a/k/a/ Josh Green,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-06-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...While each case is judged on its own merits, in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trade mark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing. ...
2019-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is 马波 (ma bo), China, represented by 北京策略律师事务所, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co.,
Ltd. ...At the time
of this Decision, that domain name redirects to the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name was created on November 16, 2019. ...
2023-07-21 - Case Details
page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Consolidation of Multiple Respondents
The amended Complaint was filed in relation to nominally different domain name registrants. The
Complainant alleges that the domain name registrants are the same entity or mere alter egos of each other,
or under common control. ...
2024-07-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dotsan, 35-37 Sunder Mahal, Mumbai, 400021, India
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain names at issue are and .
...WIPO verified that the Complaint satisfies the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and that payment was properly made. ...
2002-04-17 - Case Details
The Complainant also owns the domain names and .
Since registering the disputed domain name the Respondent has never used the disputed domain name in association with an active website. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith for the following reasons: (i) the Respondent knew about the Complainant’s rights in the trademark NUTRAWAYS when she registered the confusingly similar domain name; (ii) the Respondent changed the name of the Registrant from her personal name to her company’s name, “Victoria’s Health Inc.” on May 27, 2002 and then changed it again on January 31, 2012 back into her own personal name; (iii) the Respondent registered a confusingly similar domain name to interfere with the Complainant’s business; (iv) the Respondent has never made a bona fide use of the confusingly similar domain name; and (v) the Respondent has ignored and refused to respond to the Complainant regarding the unauthorized ownership of the confusingly similar disputed domain name.
...
2012-04-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Antonio Camberos of Coahuila, Mexico, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...At some point thereafter, the Respondent used the disputed domain name for a website headed as follows:
“TADASHIYANAI.COM. THIS DOMAIN NAME IS FOR SALE.
Your path to world wide domination starts with a good domain name.”
...
2013-11-12 - Case Details