The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited dba Register Matrix (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-01-05 - Case Details
The Complainant states that copying the Complainant's trademark in its entirety at the first and dominant part of the disputed domain name renders the disputed domain name confusingly similar to this trademark regardless of the additional element “star”, at the end of the disputed domain name.
...In assessing the degree of similarity between the Complainant's mark and the disputed domain name, the Panel notes that apart from the generic top-level domain suffix “.com”, the disputed domain name consists of “sanofiaventisstar”. ...
2009-05-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Max Richka of Kiev, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...However, even if the Respondent is selling genuine ACCUTANE products, the Panel does not regard the Respondent's use of the Domain Name as conferring rights or legitimate interests on the Respondent in respect of it.
As many Panels have held, for a reseller to have a right or legitimate interest in a domain name which reflects the mark of a particular product, the following requirements must be met: (a) the reseller must actually be offering that product; (b) the domain name must be used to sell only the trademarked product; (c) the site must accurately disclose the registrant's relationship with the owner of the mark; and (d) the respondent must not try to corner the market in domain names reflecting the mark: see Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2010-05-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Kim Beom Sung, of Kyunggi-do, 427-030, the Republic of Korea ('Respondent').
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is ('the Domain Name').
The registrar is Register.com of New York, New York, U.S.A. ...On September 9, 2002, the Registrar confirmed by e-mail that the Domain Name is registered through the Registrar, that Respondent is the current registrant of the Domain Name and that the Policy is applicable to the Domain Name.
...
2002-10-31 - Case Details
The Complainant filed an amended
Complaint on December 10, 2024, and withdrew the domain name from the proceeding,
which continued only in respect of the disputed domain name.
...The Respondent adds that the disputed domain name is similar to many
other short, acronymic, or name and surname domain names that it has acquired.
...
2025-02-27 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with P.A. Viet Nam Company Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Finally, the Complainant submits that the addition of the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix “.com” in the Disputed Domain Name does not add any distinctiveness to the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2018-12-14 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Fabulous.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name, moreover, to link to websites of competing Arabic news stations and to a commercial advertising service website is also not, in the Panel’s view, a bona fide offering of goods or services (see inter alia Six Continents Hotels, Inc., v. ...
2014-12-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liviu Cortac, Republic of Moldova.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Inovare-
Prim SRL (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, further to its independent search, the Panel has become aware that the Parties were involved in a
similar UDRP case (see Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Liviu Cortac, WIPO Case No.
DMD2024-0004, having as object the domain name ), where the proceeding was carried
out in English, despite the fact that the language of the registration agreement for that domain name was
Romanian.
...
2025-12-03 - Case Details
Respondent is Danilo Gomes, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger
Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the
Domain Name.
Notably, Complainant contends that (i) the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks;
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name; and (iii) Respondent registered
and is using the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2025-07-16 - Case Details
Respondent is DAVE DAVE, DAVIDSON LLC, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In addition, Complainant runs multiple websites including its main website using the domain name
.
The Domain Name was registered on April 3, 2024.
The Domain Name does not resolve to an active website. ...
2024-12-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot, United States of America / Milen Radumilo,
Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Further, an email server has been configured on the Domain Name.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, that the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to the Domain Name, and that the Domain
Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2022-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is melme kletis, Greece.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2025-07-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jarad King, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant argues that the Respondent could not have been unaware of the Complainant’s trade mark
at the time of registration of the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name was registered to
mislead Internet users into thinking that the disputed domain name is somehow affiliated with the
Complainant. ...
2025-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Watuso Ally, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-11-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marko Pajic, CocoFashion, Croatia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Splunk Academy of Bangalore, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with BigRock Solutions Pvt Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-09-27 - Case Details
Respondent is Brian Johnson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Domain Name be transferred to Complainant.
/Robert A. Badgley/
Robert A. Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: November 4, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Replit, Inc. v. ...
2022-11-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alexander Lyons, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on January 17, 2023.
The disputed domain name has been associated with a website offering it for sale.
5. ...
2023-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Keeley Washington, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant.
/Steven A. Maier/
Steven A. Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: June 6, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Celltrion, Inc. v. ...
2023-06-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gurpal Singh, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: March 30, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Spark Therapeutics, Inc. v. Gurpal Singh
Case No. DCO2022-0009
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2022-04-04 - Case Details