https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
Complainant and its BLOCKFI Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-06-08 - Case Details
Section 2.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states that: “[P]anels have found that the use of a domain name to host a parked page comprising PPC links does not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill of the complainant’s mark or otherwise mislead Internet users”. ...
2022-04-19 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and
use of the Disputed Domain Name to impersonate the Complainant and create a mirrored, identical website
indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and
reputation of the Complainant and its SAFE BANKING Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan
Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s
actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for
commercial gain”).
...
2022-04-11 - Case Details
The Respondent’s
registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use have been done
for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its WABCO Mark.
See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847
(“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon
the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2022-04-21 - Case Details
First, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration
and use has been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant
and its TRADER JOE’S Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an
intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark”).
...
2022-12-08 - Case Details
The Complainant employs approximately
11,000 people worldwide. It is a member of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, and its common stock is
traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX.
...
2022-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and initial use of
the Disputed Domain Name to impersonate the Complainant and create a website providing similar goods
and services as those of the Complainant, and using the Complainant’s stylized FXDD Mark indicate that
such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its FXDD Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-10-05 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
6.1 Preliminary Issue: Consolidation of Respondents
Further to the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO
Overview 3.0”), section 4.11.1, “[p]aragraph 10(e) of the UDRP Rules grants a panel the power to
consolidate multiple domain name disputes. ...
2023-01-02 - Case Details
The Complainant is a member of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index, and its common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol EFX. ...
2022-12-23 - Case Details
Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia (United States), Complainant operates or has investments in 24 countries
in North America, Central and South America, Europe and the Asia Pacific Region.
Complainant is a member of Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and its common stock is traded on the New
Your Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol EFX.
...
2022-12-22 - Case Details
Furthermore, the use of a domain name, which intentionally trades on the fame of another and suggests affiliation with the trademark owner cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services (Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847; WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.5).
...
2021-01-27 - Case Details
Segundo o art. 1o da Resolução CGI.br/RES/2008/008/P do Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, via de regra, um nome de domínio disponível para registro é concedido ao primeiro requerente que satisfaz, quando do requerimento, as exigências para o registro do mesmo. ...
2021-02-19 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
For these reasons, this Panel finds that Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain names were in bad faith, pursuant to paragraph 4(b) of the Policy.
7. ...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
See section 1.8 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”). “[P]unctuation changes such as hyphens are de minimis when analyzing a domain name for identity or confusing similarity under the Policy.” ...
2021-02-09 - Case Details
case=D2015-1149
página 5
Asimismo, la Demandante ha acreditado que el código fuente de la página web del Demandado contenía
específicamente la marca CORPBANCA (incluyendo la letra P) de la Demandante, lo que confirma el
propósito fraudulento y parasitario del Demandado.
A la vista de ello, el Experto considera que concurre claramente mala fe en el registro y uso del nombre de
dominio en disputa y que esta conducta resulta claramente subsumible en la circunstancia acreditativa de la
mala fe incluida en el apartado (iv) del párrafo 4(b) de la Política:
“(iv) si, al utilizar el nombre de dominio, usted ha intentado de manera intencionada atraer, con ánimo de
lucro, a usuarios de Internet a su sitio web o a otro sitio en línea, creando confusión con la marca del
demandante en cuanto al origen, patrocinio, afiliación o promoción de su sitio web o su sitio en línea o de un
producto o servicio en su sitio web o sitio en línea.”
...
2022-07-18 - Case Details
O nome de domínio em disputa, , excluída a terminação “.com.br”, incorpora porção substancial dos sinais anteriores da Reclamante, não tendo a substituição da última letra “p” pela letra “i” o condão de afastar uma associação indevida com os direitos anteriores da Reclamante.
...
2021-07-08 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi / “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
For these reasons, this Panel finds that Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name was in bad faith.
7. ...
2021-08-13 - Case Details
Softech Ltd., DNS Administrator (gold),
WIPO Case No. D2007-1699; and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323].
The addition of the generic Top-Level-Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” to the disputed domain name constitutes a technical requirement of the Domain Name System (“DNS”), and therefore has no legal significance in the present case (see CARACOLITO S SAS v. ...
2021-07-20 - Case Details
Le Requérant est titulaire de plusieurs marques DOLPHIN dont la suivante :
- Marque Suisse DOLPHIN n° P-468225 enregistrée le 5 janvier 2000.
Le Requérant est également titulaire du nom de domaine .
...
2022-12-15 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that GILEAD is a well-known and famous brand, adding that it is a member of the S&P 500, employs 14,500 individuals worldwide, and has been the recipient of unsolicited news articles in publications such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post, as well as Internet sources, and other articles.
...
2021-11-10 - Case Details