DBR2023-0013; e Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft e Volkswagen do Brasil Indústria de Veículos
Automotores Ltda. v. P. C. J., Caso OMPI No. DBR2015-0005.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=DBR2023-0013
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2025-12-08 - Case Details
With respect to bad faith registration and use of the domain name, Complainant argues:
“[P]anels have repeatedly held that using a domain name in connection with a monetized parking page under
the circumstances present here – including links labeled “Wrestling Games” and “Raw Tickets” […], which
are associated with the services described by Complainant’s WWE Trademark […] – constitutes bad faith.”
...
2025-11-10 - Case Details
Complainant owns the trademark CLAUDE (the “CLAUDE Mark”), including United States Trademark
Registration No. 7645254 applied of February 10, 2023 and registered on January 7, 2025, in international
class 42: in connection with “[p]roviding temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software that includes,
accesses, uses, and interacts with an artificial intelligence model to perform generative text AI tasks and
natural language processing AI tasks and to produce written content based on a theme, text summaries,
document question-answering, and natural conversation simulation; application service provider featuring
application programming interface (API) software for performing generative text AI tasks and natural
language processing AI task and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document
question-answering and simulating natural conversations; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software
using artificial intelligence for performing generative text AI tasks and natural language processing AI tasks
and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating
natural conversations”. ...
2025-10-01 - Case Details
Paragraph 10(c) of the Rules requires that the administrative proceeding takes p...
The Respondent’s mailing address is in Ukraine, which is subject to an international conflict at the date of this Decision. ...
2026-03-02 - Case Details
Here, the Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed
Domain Name indicates that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading
upon and targeting the reputation, name, mark, and goodwill of the Complainant. See Madonna Ciccone,
p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible
explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of
Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2026-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent’s registration and use of the Disputed Domain
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
Name indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name
and reputation of the Complainant and its OLYMPIC Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan
Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s
actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for
commercial gain”).
...
2022-04-01 - Case Details
This website features the Second Complainant’s logo, which
consists of a stylized form of the words “Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd” and the letters “b” and “p” intertwined
to create the shape of a globe.
The Complainants are the owner of numerous trade mark registrations for BRITANNIA (the “BRITANNIA
Mark”) in various jurisdictions including a United Kingdom registration, registered on September 13, 1996,
(registration number 2043054) for goods in classes 5 and 10.
...
2022-03-23 - Case Details
D2001-1185; and contrast NP Factory Werbeagentur GmbH and Nastroje P. GmbH & Co. KG v. Demurrelt Enterprises Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1858.
The Complainant has established a prima facie case that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and thereby the burden of production shifts to the Respondent to produce evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
...
2022-02-03 - Case Details
For present purposes it is sufficient to identify two of those registrations, namely:
Swiss Trademark Registration No. P-512484 OLYMPIC GAMES (words) registered on June 30, 2003
for a wide variety of goods and services in all 45 classes, including services in class 35 relating to the
promotion and sponsorship of international sporting events.
...
2022-03-03 - Case Details
In addition, the Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain name indicate that such registration and use had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its trademark ALSTOM. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”)
In the Panel’s view, the Complainant’s mark is famous and registration by the unrelated Respondent creates a presumption of bad faith in this case. ...
2022-03-02 - Case Details
Section 3.5 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states that “[p]articularly with respect to ‘automatically’ generated pay-
per-click links, panels have held that a respondent cannot disclaim responsibility for content appearing on
the website associated with its domain name (nor would such links ipso facto vest the respondent with rights
or legitimate interests)”. ...
2022-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent’s
registration and use of the Disputed Domain Name indicate that such registration and use had been done for
the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainant and its OUTFRONT Mark.
See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847
(“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon
the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
Vale mencionar também que a Caterpillar Brasil LTDA é titular de 10 (dez) nomes de domínio “.br”
compostos pelos mesmos elementos nominativos “CAT” e “CATERPILLAR”, a saber: ;
; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; e ,
onde os dois últimos foram transferidos para a referida Reclamante em decorrência do caso Caterpillar
Inc., Caterpillar Brasil Ltda. v. A. d. P. F., Caso OMPI No. DBR2020-0014.
O Reclamado, por outro lado, é titular do nome de domínio em disputa ,
registrado perante o Nic.br em 10 de setembro de 2020. ...
2022-08-30 - Case Details
First, based on the circumstances here, the Panel concludes that the Respondent’s registration and use of
the Disputed Domain Name had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its INSTAGRAM Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-10-19 - Case Details
Section 2.10.1 of the already quoted WIPO Overview 3.0 indicates that “[p]anels have recognized that
merely registering a domain name comprised of a dictionary word or phrase does not by itself automatically
confer rights or legitimate interests on the respondent; panels have held that mere arguments that a domain
name corresponds to a dictionary term/phrase will not necessarily suffice. ...
2022-10-18 - Case Details
The composition
of the Disputed Domain Name indicates that such registration and holding has been done for the specific
purpose of trading on the name and reputation of the Complainants and its BLUE BUFFALO Mark. See
Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he
only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the
fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial gain”).
...
2022-05-05 - Case Details
Second, based on the circumstances here, the Panel concludes that Respondent’s registration and use of
the Disputed Domain Name had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its CARREFOUR Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”). ...
2022-04-29 - Case Details
Section 2.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 states
that: “[P]anels have found that the use of a domain name to host a parked page comprising PPC links does
not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill
of the complainant’s mark or otherwise mislead Internet users”. ...
2022-05-30 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd, WIPO Case No.
D2015-0886; and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No.
D2000-0847).
It is acknowledged that once the Panel finds a prima facie case is made by a complainant, the burden of
production under the second element shifts to the respondent to come forward with relevant evidence
demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
First, based on the circumstances here, the Panel concludes that the Respondent’s registration and use of
the Disputed Domain Name had been done for the specific purpose of trading on the name and reputation of
the Complainant and its FACEBOOK Mark. See Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and
“Madonna.com”, WIPO Case No. D2000-0847 (“[t]he only plausible explanation for Respondent’s actions
appears to be an intentional effort to trade upon the fame of Complainant’s name and mark for commercial
gain”).
...
2022-05-23 - Case Details