Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL PANEL ADMINISTRATIVO
Google LLC c. Antonio Mesa García
Caso No. D2019-1837
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, Estados Unidos de América (“Estados Unidos”), representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...La Demandante es titular de registros de la marca comercial GOOGLE vigentes a nivel internacional, y anteriores a la fecha de registro de los nombres de dominio en disputa:
- Marca de la Unión Europea (“MUE”) nº 1104306 GOOGLE, en clases 9, 35, 38 and 42, registrada el 7 de octubre de 2005;
- MUE nº 10081073 GOOGLE (mixta), en clases 9, 35, 36 y 42, registrada el 16 de diciembre de 2011;
- MUE nº 15085152 GOOGLE (mixta) en clases 9, 25, 35, 36, 38, 42, 45, registrada el 24 de junio de 2016;
- MUE nº 15033211 GOOGLE (mixta) en clases 9, 25, 35, 36, 38, 42 y 45, registrada el 20 de junio de 2016;
- Marca Internacional nº 881006 GOOGLE (mixta), que designa, entre otros, España y la Unión Europea, en clases 9, 38 y 42, registrada el 12 de enero de 2006.
...
2019-10-08 - Case Details
D2000-1240; Google Inc. v. Jeltes Consulting / N. Tea Pty Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0994; Google Inc. v. txtcorp,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0453; Google Inc. v. Advertising services Saigon Vietnam,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1157; Google Inc. v. Thilak Raj, Net Jobs,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-12-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. txtcorp
Case No. D2009-0453
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Middletons Lawyers, Australia.
...The phrase “to Google” has begun to be employed as a verb meaning to search using the Complainant's “Google” search engine. ...
2009-07-28 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. Grigor Rostami
Case No. DCO2020-0072
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google LLC, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Carlos Polo y Asociados, Spain.
...The Panel concludes that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the GOOGLE Mark.
First, it is uncontroverted that the Complainant has established trademark rights in the GOOGLE Mark based on its long and continuous use globally. ...
2020-12-17 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google, Inc. v. Robert Takovich
Case No. DMX2012-0006
1. The Parties
Complainant is Google, Inc. of California, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Dickinson Wright, PLLC, United States.
...The Respondent has not received permission nor authorization to use the trademarks GMAIL and GOOGLE. There is no evidence that Respondent is (an individual, business or corporation) known by the names “Gmail” and “Google”. ...
2012-08-31 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Sudam Chakraborty
Case No. D2009-0030
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates of Gurgaon, National Capital Region, Haryana, India.
...In order to support this contention, the Complainant explains that “GOOGLE” is a unique coined word which exclusively refers to the Complainant and its services, that the GOOGLE trademark has acquired a considerable world-wide goodwill, that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name a significant period after the Complainant started using its GOOGLE trademark for the marketing of its goods and services and many years after the Complainant had registered the term GOOGLE as a trademark and domain name in many jurisdictions. ...
2009-03-23 - Case Details
The search engine service under the trademark GOOGLE is available in more than 150
interface languages.
The Complainant has registered the trademark GOOGLE all over the world, including Indian trademark for
GOOGLE transliterated in Hindi, No. 1513045, registered on December 13, 2006. ...The Complainant has registered the trademark GOOGLE all over the world, including Indian trademark for GOOGLE transliterated in Hindi, No. 1513045, registered on December 13, 2006. ...
2023-05-23 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Advertising services Saigon Vietnam
Case No. D2009-1157
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula & Associates, India.
...The Complainant's trademark is entirely incorporated in the disputed domain name.
GOOGLE is not a word which is in use in the English language.
The name GOOGLE is the dominant and distinctive element of the domain name.
...
2009-11-02 - Case Details
D2000-1240; Google Inc. v. Jeltes Consulting / N. Tea Pty Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0994; Google Inc. v. txtcorp,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0453; Google Inc. v. Advertising services Saigon Vietnam,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1157; Google Inc. v. Thilak Raj, Net Jobs,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-12-16 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. Mitra Haman and Samaneh Latifi
Case No. D2019-1233
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google LLC, United States of America, represented by Rouse and Co. ...Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner, amongst others, of the following trademark registrations (Annexes 12 and 16 to the Complaint):
- Iranian Trademark registration No. 124620 for GOOGLE registered on September 28, 2005, to cover products and services in classes 09 and 42; and
- Iranian Trademark registration No. 124622 for GOOGLE (in farsi) registered on October 1, 2005, to cover products and services in classes 09 and 42.
...
2019-09-25 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google, Inc. v. wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain
Case No. D2000-1240
1. Parties
The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is Google Inc., a California corporation with its principal place of business at 2400 E. ...Complainant also offers co-branded web search solutions for information content providers, and has partnerships with some of the Internet's most prominent companies.
Google is the owner of several U.S. trademark applications (Serial Nos. 75/554461 and 75/978469) for the mark GOOGLE and also owns numerous registrations and applications in other countries throughout the world for the mark GOOGLE. ...
2000-11-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
UITSPRAAK GESCHILLENBESLECHTER
Google, Inc. v. M. Minnebreuker
Zaaknr. DNL2008-0012
1. Partijen
Eiseres is Google, Inc., statutair gevestigd te Mountain View, Californië, Verenigde Staten van Amerika, vertegenwoordigd door De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, Amsterdam, Nederland.
...Merken
Eiseres beroept zich in deze procedure in het bijzonder op de volgende merken (hierna: “de Merken”):
(a) het woordmerk GOOGLE, ingeschreven in de Benelux op 10 september 2001 onder nummer 694499, voor waren in de klassen 9, 38 en 42;
(b) het beeldmerk ‘Google’, ingeschreven in de Benelux op 21 maart 2005 onder nummer 762753, voor waren in de klassen 9, 38 en 42;
(c) het woordmerk GOOGLE, in de Gemeenschap gedeponeerd op 12 maart 1999 en geregistreerd op 7 oktober 2005 onder nummer 1104306, voor waren in de klassen 9, 35, 38 en 42;
(d) het woordmerk GOOGLE, in de Gemeenschap gedeponeerd op 17 augustus 2006 en geregistreerd op 23 augustus 2007 onder nummer 5263868, voor waren in de klasse 36;
(e) het woordmerk GOOGLE, in de Gemeenschap gedeponeerd op 29 maart 2005 en geregistreerd op 18 april 2006 onder nummer 4316642, voor waren in de klassen 16, 25 en 35.
...
2008-07-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
DECISIONE DEL COLLEGIO
Google LLC c. Call & Meet S.r.l.
Caso No. DEU2020-0020
1. Le Parti
Il Ricorrente è Google LLC, Stati Uniti d'America, rappresentato da Società Italiana Brevetti S.p.A., Italia.
...Il Ricorrente è titolare di numerose registrazioni di marchio aventi per oggetto la denominazione GOOGLE, tra le quali:
- Registrazione di Marchio dell’Unione Europea n. 001104306 GOOGLE, del 7 ottobre 2005;
- Registrazione di Marchio dell’Unione Europea n. 004316642 GOOGLE, del 18 aprile 2006.
...
2021-01-15 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL EXPERTO
Google LLC. c. Mar Alsius
Case No. DES2020-0042
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es Google LLC, Estados Unidos de América, representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados, España.
...Antecedentes de Hecho
La Demandante es una multinacional estadounidense titular del motor de búsqueda Google.
La Demandante es titular de numerosos registros marcarios en diferentes jurisdicciones. Entre otros y en relación a la Oficina de Propiedad Intelectual de la Unión Europea (EUIPO):
Marca de la Unión Europea Nº 001104306, GOOGLE, en clases 9, 35, 38 and 42. ...
2020-12-04 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. Googler Software Solutions
Case No. D2021-3295
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google LLC, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Fidus Law Chambers, India.
...The Complainant is the proprietor of numerous registered trademarks around the world in respect of GOOGLE, including United States trademark number 2,884,502 GOOGLE registered on September 14, 2004, and India trademark number 1480385 GOOGLE registered as of August 21, 2006.
...
2021-12-06 - Case Details
Instead, in this case, it appears that the Complainant mistakenly listed Google LLC (who clearly appears as the registrar in the relevant WhoIs information) as a respondent. Moreover, the information Google LLC provided to the Center on February 19, 2021 identifying Kiet Anh Pham as the registrant of the disputed domain name confirms that Google LLC’s role was limited to that of the domain name registrar. ...This decision should not be construed as adverse to Google LLC....
2021-05-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google Inc. v. Ajan, Ozel Ajan (269186)
Case No. D2009-1724
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google Inc. of California, United States of America, represented by Ranjan Narula Associates of India.
...The fame and unique qualities of the GOOGLE mark make it extremely unlikely that the Respondent created the disputed domain name independently. ...
2010-02-15 - Case Details
The location of each branch is also shown on a Google map thumbnail which can be expanded by clicking on it.
Ads by Google are also prominent on the main page: they are most prominent in a box on the right hand side but are also present in a menu bar across the top of the page. ...Using this function then directs one to a link which offers tips and advice on how to reduce the cost of a loan. Around these tips and advice are more Ads by Google.
It is also worth saying a bit more about Ads by Google and how they work. Ads by Google appear on websites that use Google's AdSense program to show advertisements. ...
2011-04-08 - Case Details
Innehavaren har tidigare själv “parkerat” domännamnet hos Google. Innehavaren får antas känna till att Google ser till att annonser som relaterar till sökord som motsvarar domännamn kan innebära att annonser relaterade till verksamhet under kännetecken som är identiskt med eller liknar domännamn kan komma att exponeras. ...Innehavaren har uppgett att Innehavaren har “flytta bort” domännamnet från Google så snart Innehavaren fick kunskap om att Sökanden hade invändningar mot användningen via Google. ...
2018-04-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Google LLC v. 舒鑫 (Shu Xin)
Case No. D2019-1990
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Google LLC, United States of America (“USA”), represented by Cooley LLP, USA.
...The Complainant also provides evidence that on February 1, 2017, the Brand Finance Global 500 ranked the Complainant’s trademark GOOGLE as the most valuable brand in the world.
The Complainant owns a large portfolio of trademark registrations (word and device marks) for GOOGLE, for instance, Chinese trademark registration number 5556520, registered on December 7, 2009 and USA trademark registration number 2884502, registered on September 14, 2004. ...
2019-10-30 - Case Details