About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3200   document(s)s (0.028 sec)

Rows

<<  <  381 - 400  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0601 for primevere-creation.com pdf (146 KB)

In this regard, the Respondent is in no way connected with the Complainant and has no authorization to use any of the Complainant’s trademarks. The disputed domain name resolves to a fake Facebook login page, apparently to obtain the user’s Facebook login details. There is no evidence on record that the Respondent is or was commonly known by the disputed domain name as an individual, business, or other organization. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith Use of a domain name containing a trademark in relation to a fake Facebook web page may constitute evidence of bad faith registration and use. Here, the use by the Respondent of the confusingly similar Domain Name to point to fake Facebook page appears intended to attract Internet users to unlawfully obtain Internet user’s data, and as such constitutes registration and use in bad faith. ...

2023-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1121 for 9instadp.com, downloadinstagramvideos.net, getfbstuff.com, insta-downloader.net, instagramdp.net, instagreels.net html (22 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Instagram, LLC and Facebook Inc. v. Domains By Proxy, LLC / vaibhav rajput, careernjobs group Case No. D2021-1121 1. The Parties The Complainant is Instagram, LLC and Facebook Inc., United States of America (“United States”), represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...The Complaint submit that since Instagram LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Facebook Inc, they have a sufficient common legal interest in the trademarks reproduced in the disputed domain names to file a joint Complaint. ...

2021-06-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2714 for wynnmacauweb.live pdf (150 KB)

On or around June 19, 2024, the Disputed Domain Name resolved to an e-commerce website listing clothing from other brands, along with their prices. A Facebook page which emulated the Complainant Group’s own Facebook page also listed the URL of the website resolved from the Disputed Domain Name. The emulative Facebook page incorporated the WYNN Trademark, WYNN MACAU Trademark, content of the Complainant Group’s collaborative event with Omega watches, and photographs f rom the Complainant Group’s Facebook page. ...

2024-09-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2573 for fb-down.net pdf (185 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant, Meta Platforms, Inc., is a social technology company, and operates, inter alia, Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. The Complainant is the holder of numerous registered trademarks, including the following: - FACEBOOK, Pakistan trademark registered on March 31, 2008, with registration No. 248352 in class 451; - FACEBOOK, Unites States trademark registered on January 10, 2006, with registration No. 3041791 in class 35; - FB, Unites States trademark registered on December 23, 2014, with registration No.4659777 in class 35; The Disputed Domain Name was registered on January 12, 2023. According to the evidence provided by the Complainant, the Disputed Domain Name resolved to a commercial website that purportedly offered an online service enabling Internet users to download Facebook videos. The Disputed Domain Name currently resolves to a parking page of the Registrar. ...

2024-09-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1878 for oculusr.com, oculusu.com, oculusus.com html (20 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook Technologies, LLC v. 谢飞 (Xie Fei) Case No. D2021-1878 1. The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Technologies, LLC, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background The Complainant, Facebook Technologies, LLC, is a subsidiary of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), and holds the intellectual property rights for various technologies owned by Facebook. ...

2021-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCN2021-0048 for tencentmeta.cn html (10 KB)

被投诉人 该域名分为两部分:Tencent+Meta。投诉人认为 Tencent 是他的所有权,那么她为什么不认为"META"是FACEBOOK 的所有权呢。 本人抢注域名只是为猜测 facebook 改名的方向,并顺手注册了该域名,并没有使用和和进行其他活动!也没有对 Tencent 公司和 META 公司造成任何损失! 所以本人认为 Tencent teams 应该在市场上买入和取得 FACEBOOK 的书面授权。...但是没有技术公司这样去做(包含腾讯域名注册平台)。 与恶意注册没有任何关系;是猜测 FACEBOOK 域名的全球市场行为。在附件中提供注册其他域名的先后顺序:即 Facebook 公布之前我已经申请其他域名,比如 ZALO META.COM(注册日期为 10/27)。 请判决域名归注册方我所有。...

2022-02-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DME2025-0019 for www-adm.me pdf (150 KB)

Complainant argues that Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith because: (1) Respondent is using the disputed domain name to deceive individuals via a webpage and Facebook postings by multiple Facebook users encouraging others to register and “make money”; (2) Respondent has fraudulently solicited personal information on its webpage and though its Facebook activities; (3) Respondent’s activities are damaging to Complainant’s reputation, employee and business relationships, and; (4) the registration of Complainant’s well-known trademark by Respondent in itself evidence is bad faith, including through creating a likelihood of confusion between Respondent and Complainant and its well- known trademark. ...This was part of a broader scheme involving associated Facebook postings offering financial bonuses to Internet users for providing information, and for inviting additional providers of information. ...

2025-08-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3236 for fbinstagram.com html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC v. Karunakar kotha Case No. D2020-3236 1. The Parties Complainant is Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC, United States of America (“United States”), represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...In addition, Internet users familiar with Complainant would likely find the combination of the FB trademark acronym (for Complainant’s principal Facebook identifier) with its distinctive INSTAGRAM trademark to indicate an association with Complainant. ...

2021-03-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1348 for copyright-fb.com, copyrights-fb.com html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook, Inc. v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Legjendari Kosovar Case No. D2020-1348 1. The Parties The Complainant is Facebook, Inc., United States of America (“United States”), represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...The Domain Name has been used to send emails purporting to be from the Complainant, reproducing the Complainant’s blue “F” logo, asserting that the recipient had breached “Facebook Pages Terms” and directing them to a website that mimicked the Complainant’s Facebook website, which invited the visitor to provide their personal information including name, date of birth, and Facebook log-in email address or phone number. 5. ...

2020-08-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2356 for facebook-managers.com pdf (171 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <facebook-managers.com> is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on June 29, 2022. ...The Complainant ... The Complainant’s trademark FACEBOOK is registered in various countries all over the worlds, for example in the United States under No. 3122052, registered on July 25, 2006. ...

2022-08-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0196 for metaquest.how, metaquest.sc, metaquest.skin, metaquest.wedding pdf (205 KB)

The Complainant, Meta Platforms, Inc. (formally known as “Facebook, Inc.”) is a social technology company, which operates Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Meta Quest (formerly known as “Oculus”). ...The Complainants have also made substantial investments in developing a strong presence online by being active on various social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. For instance, Meta’s official page on Facebook has over 76 million “likes” and more than 13 million followers on Twitter. ...

2023-03-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1956 for instagrambadge.com html (16 KB)

Rather, the use of the disputed domain name to mimic a Facebook login page is clearly a scam designed to mislead Internet users into providing their personal account information which could be used to their detriment. ...The Panel is satisfied that the Respondent, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant and its trademark INSTAGRAM, deliberately registered and used the disputed domain name to attract Internet users to its website with a view to commercial gain, namely obtaining users’ personal Facebook account information. Since Instagram is owned by Facebook, it is not inconceivable that Internet users would be tricked into entering their login details, believing that access to the Instagram badge service required them to login in to their Facebook account, which is a common method of registering for and logging in to different services. ...

2018-10-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2580 for instagramlikefollowers.com html (27 KB)

That Facebook page includes a post dated December 24, 2018 promoting itself as the “Cheapest Website to Increase Followers” including a price: “Likes for 0.1$/1000”. ...Moreover, the advertisement or post on Tanwar Digital Marketing’s Facebook page dated December 24, 2018 shows it was well aware of the Complainant and its service by then. ...

2020-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0366 for fbleadscraper.com, fbmailextractor.com html (20 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook, Inc. v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Md Nazmul Hasan / Addie Raajpoot Case No. D2019-0366 1. The Parties The Complainant is Facebook, Inc. of Menlo Park, California, United States of America, represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...

2019-05-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0750 for legodiscounts.com, legopoudlard.com html (21 KB)

The disputed domain name was also linked to a Facebook page. The Respondent Brahim Mahjoubi registered the disputed domain name on February 12, 2019. ...There were no visible disclaimers on the websites or Facebook pages linked to the disputed domain names. Furthermore, the website under the disputed domain name prominently displayed the Complainant’s “LEGO TECHNIC” logo. ...

2019-06-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0725 for horizoncreator.com, horizoncreators.com, horizondiscover.com, horizoneasy.com, horizonengineer.com, horizonexpand.com, horizongirl.com, horizonhomebuilder.com, horizonmeeting.com, horizonmultiverse.com, horizonqueen.com, horizonsex.com, horizonxxx.com html (51 KB)

Factual Background Complainant is a United States social technology company that operates Facebook, Instagram, Meta Quest (formerly Oculus), Novi, Portal, and WhatsApp. Formerly known as "Facebook, Inc.", Complainant changed its name to "Meta Platforms, Inc." on October 28, 2021. ...February 2, 2022: “Please note, that I did not register these domains to target Facebook. I thought that they were attractive as they contain the generic word ‘Horizon’, which has a lot of use outside of Facebook. ...

2022-04-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2663 for fomo.games html (29 KB)

Seventh, the Respondent also uses the same colour scheme on his Facebook page, “@fomo_gs”. The Panel notes also that the Respondent’s Facebook page uses the same designation, “fomo_gs” as the domain name used by the Complainant. ...It is also two days before the Respondent created his Facebook page “@fomo_gs” declaring “we suck at games we really DO!” in the same colour scheme as adopted by the Complainant. ...

2021-01-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3117 for fbcdn.cash html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook, Inc. v. Domain Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org. / cou cou Case No. D2020-3117 1. The Parties The Complainant is Facebook, Inc., United States of America (“United States”), represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the FACEBOOK and FB trademarks duly registered in several countries around the world (Annex 8 to the Complaint). ...

2021-02-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DUA2022-0001 for boehringer-ingelheim.com.ua pdf (147 KB)

Загалом тягар доказування у справах покладається на заявника, однак, як тільки заявник робить prima facie заяву про відсутність прав або законних інтересів, у цьому питанні тягар доказування супротивного покладається на Відповідача (див., наприклад, Facebook Inc. v. Private Registration / Denis Khakimov, справа ВОІВ No. DUA2019-0002). Відповідач у даній справі не надав ніяких доказів його прав або законних інтересів на спірне доменне ім’я. ...Той факт, що спірне доменне ім’я більше не веде до активної веб-сторінки, не є підставою для висновку про його використання для будь-якого bona fide пропонування товарів або послуг (див., наприклад, Facebook Inc. v. Private Registration / Denis Khakimov, справа ВОІВ No. DUA2019-0002). Так само такою підставою не може вважатись його попереднє використання з єдиною метою пропонування спірного доменного імені для продажу. ...

2023-07-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2160 for oculusporn.com html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Facebook Technologies, LLC v. Jack Zhang Case No. D2019-2160 1. The Parties Complainant is Facebook Technologies, LLC, United States of America, represented by Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP, France. ...Founded in 2012, Oculus was acquired by Facebook, Inc. in 2014. Complainant owns trademarks for the OCULUS mark, including in the United States, where Respondent lists his address of record. ...

2019-10-30 - Case Details