Although the addition of other term, here “hanoi”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
Disputed Domain Name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...However, it is well proven and evidenced by the Panel that the website
under the Disputed Domain Name used to offer for sale furniture f ittings bearing the Complainant’s BLUM
trademark and advertised such products using product images and other copyright protected material f rom
the Complainant’s of f icial website.
...
2025-06-06 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...If one of the disputed domain names was indeed used in connection with f raudulent activities such as
phishing, it has been determined by panels that the use of a domain name for illegitimate activity or illegal
activity including phishing, impersonation/passing of f , or other types of f raud constitutes bad faith.
...
2025-07-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center
notif ied Respondent’s default on May 21, 2025.
The Center appointed Gabriel F. Leonardos as the sole panelist in this matter on May 26, 2025. The Panel
f inds that it was properly constituted. ...Furthermore, the gTLD “.wales” is typically disregarded under the f irst element. See WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.11.1.
Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been
established.
...
2025-06-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
It results f rom the Complainant’s undisputed allegations that it was founded in 1903 and is a global
automotive industry leader. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-06-05 - Case Details
The “About Us” page made the kind of generic statements about
company values that can be produced readily by artificial intelligence but did not identify any of f icers, of fer
any company history, or indicate whether and how the company is regulated by any f inancial services
supervisory authority. ...There is no
obvious reason to use the English word “stripe” for a website relating to f inancial investments, such as the
Respondent’s former website, other than to exploit the Complainant’s reputation in f inancial services. ...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms “gov” and “support” may bear on assessment of the second and third
elements, the Panel f inds the addition of such terms does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity
between the disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...Having reviewed the available record, the Panel notes the distinctiveness
or reputation of the Complainant’s trademark, and the composition of the disputed domain name, and f inds
that in the circumstances of this case the passive holding of the disputed domain name does not prevent a
f inding of bad faith under the Policy.
...
2023-12-15 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is: f r.net>.
The Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations formed with the name “Credit Mutuel”.
...Further, the registration of the disputed domain name, which dif fers f rom the well-known Complainant’s
trademark only because of the addition of extra letters “e”, “fr” demonstrates the Respondent’s will to select
the disputed domain name which is suf f iciently similar to the trademark to attract the Internet users.
...
2023-10-06 - Case Details
Therefore, based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been
established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Having reviewed the record, the Panel notes the distinctiveness of
the Complainant’s trademark and the composition of the disputed domain name and f inds that in the
circumstances of this case the current passive holding of the disputed domain name does not prevent a
f inding of bad faith under the Policy.
...
2023-10-20 - Case Details
The Complainant of fers short-term car insurance f rom its of f icial website at “www.tempcover.com”.
The disputed domain name was registered on January 9, 2026. ...The Panel notes that the disputed domain name is clearly constituted by the Complainant’s trademark
preceded by the additional term “verify”. The Panel f inds it most likely that the Respondent registered the
disputed domain name with the intention of suggesting an af f iliation with the Complainant. ...
2026-04-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is Arkema France, a French company, present in 55 countries and a leading company in
the f ield of material science, offering a wide range of products (e.g., paints, adhesives, coats, glues, f ibers,
resins as well as rough and f inished materials). ...Furthermore, the addition of the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD “) “.com” is viewed as a standard
registration requirement and as such is disregarded under the f irst element and has no ef fect in the
confusing similarity test. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2024-07-08 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms, here “sa”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...The
Respondent’s registration in bad faith of the disputed domain name may accordingly also be inferred f rom
these circumstances. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.2.2.
The Panel f inds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.
7. ...
2025-05-16 - Case Details
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
For the second element, the Complainant must prove that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate
interests in the disputed domain name.
...On the issue of use, the record shows that the Respondent’s f raudulent email scam indicates that the
Respondent was deliberately using the disputed domain name for the Respondent’s f inancial benef it by
creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s trademark as to the source, sponsorship, af f iliation
or endorsement of the Respondent’s website and emails. ...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
While the addition of other terms (here, “PPV”) may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...Accordingly, the Panel is satisfied that the Respondent has indeed engaged in impersonation/passing of f .
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the second element of the Policy has been established.
...
2023-10-06 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms, here, “400”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2025-08-25 - Case Details
The Panel f inds
that the mark is nonetheless recognizable within the disputed domain. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2024-05-16 - Case Details
For similar reasons, it is irrelevant that the disputed domain name
omits the word “investment” f rom the GUGGENHEIM INVESTMENT ADVISORS mark.
Based on the available record, the Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...Furthermore, panels have held that the use of a domain name for illegal activity (here,
impersonation/passing of f or other kinds of f raud) can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a
respondent. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.13.1.
...
2024-01-04 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms, here, “hq” may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2026-01-09 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center
on September 24, 2025. The Complainant submitted supplemental f iling on September 30, 2025.
page 2
The Center appointed William F. Hamilton, Sally M. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the
Complainant’s Mark in its entirety, adding only the letter “s.” Such a minor variation does not prevent a
f inding of confusing similarity. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
...
2025-12-05 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...Further, according to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules, the Panel may draw f rom the lack of response of the
Respondent such inference as it considers appropriate. The Panel is of the view that the lack of response
f rom the Respondent corroborates the absence of any rights or legitimate interests of the Respondent in the
disputed domain names.
...
2025-04-14 - Case Details
Although the addition of other terms here, “-net”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel f inds the addition of such term does not prevent a f inding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.1, section 1.8.
The Panel f inds the f irst element of the Policy has been established.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate
rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.
...
2026-04-09 - Case Details