About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 12374   document(s)s (0.046 sec)

Rows

<<  <  12361 - 12374

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0856 for iscrub.com html (68 KB)

Three of those pages are for February 9, 10 and 12, 2005 and are in evidence in these proceedings as Exhibits F, G and H respectively to the Declaration of a Technical Support Technician in the office of the Complainant’s attorneys and who conducted the search. ...

2007-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-1032 for shanghaivogue.com html (33 KB)

上述通讯之复印件为附件E。 在或约在2002年3月19日,被投诉人以电子邮件详细答复陈韵云律师行(见附件F)。其中,被投诉人确认收到投诉人2002年3月14日之传真及电子邮件形式的警告信。不过,被投诉人声称投诉人的商标VOGUE”不大闻名”,”不应该在中国获得保护”,并且警告投诉人”不得使用互联网名称与数字地址分配机构之争议解决政策对付被投诉人”。 ...

2004-05-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DMX2011-0009 for blink.com.mx, blink.mx html (77 KB)

Buchanan Smith como Experto Único y señalando el día 19 de abril de 2011, como la fecha para la emisión de la Decisión del Experto, notificando lo anterior de conformidad con el artículo 8.F del Reglamento. En la misma fecha, el Centro transfirió el expediente del caso al suscrito Experto. ...

2011-05-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0093 for trademe.com html (72 KB)

Park further states that: (a) the Respondent did not operate in Australia or New Zealand in July 2001 or at any time; (b) the Respondent did not register the disputed domain name with the Complainant's trademark in mind and had no knowledge of Complainant, its web site, its business name or trademark when it registered the disputed domain name; (c) the Respondent did not register the disputed domain name with the intent to sell it to the Complainant, to disrupt Complainant's business, or to confuse consumers seeking to find Complainant's web site; (d) the Respondent did not register the disputed domain name to prevent the Complainant from owning a domain name incorporating its trademark; (e) the Respondent has registered more than 16 other domain names containing the word “trade”; (f) the Respondent hosts the website with HitFarm.com, a domain name parking service, which displays pay-per-click advertising links on hosted domain names powered by a feed from Yahoo!...

2009-04-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1286 for internicregistration.com, internicregistration.net, internicregistration.org, internicregistrations.com, internicregistrations.net, internicregistrations.org html (74 KB)

[After statements concerning an allegedly Korean owner of SoftBank, the alleged owner of VeriSign, now the owner of NSI], ... [f]or further details about the gentleman, I suggest you consult your own Ms. Eun Joo Min [the Case Manager], whom Phil personally chose as arbiter for my case, she also grew up in Korea and as an attorney, must be well versed on the subject [of the Korean owner]. ...

2001-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2103 for personacosmetics.com, personamakeup.com, personaskin.com html (92 KB)

Further, the panel noted that, just as in this case, “the federal court litigation is only at the motion to dismiss stage.” In this regard, “[i]f that motion is granted, the lawsuit will be dismissed without reaching any decision on the merits. ...

2021-10-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0002 for bigbrotherafrica.com html (82 KB)

From the evidence Respondent has gathered, Complainant’s titles were “Big Brother followed by a certain subtitle” not as Complainant claims that they were named “Big Brother Africa followed by that subtitle.” Annex F to the Response showing, Big Brother Revolution, Big Brother All Stars, Big Brother Amplified, Big Brother Stargame together with their respective logos as they were used by Complainant. ...

2013-04-04 - Case Details