The Respondent is Whois Agent (651421573), Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc, United States of America (“US”) / Wis Inc, WIS INC, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. dba Dynames.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-07-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Andy Sawieljew of Little Falls, New Jersey, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name because: (i) the Respondent is in no way related to the Complainant or its business activities, and is not an agent of the Complainant; (ii) the Complainant has not entered into any agreement granting the Respondent any right, license or authorization to make use of its registered trademarks; (iii) the Respondent could have no possible justification for registering the disputed domain name (that incorporates the well-known LIFE OK trademark as well as the domain name ) approximately two years after the registration of the Complainant’s domain name and the LIFE OK trademark; (iv) there is no evidence whatsoever of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the disputed domain name, in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and/or services; (v) the Respondent is not hosting any website using the disputed domain name and, as such, is merely cybersquatting on the registration of the disputed domain name; (vi) the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and appears to have no connection whatsoever to the LIFE OK trademark; and (vii) the Respondent is not making any legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name but, in fact, is making no use of it and, as such, has registered it with the sole intent to make illegitimate commercial gain and to tarnish the Complainant’s LIFE OK trademark.
...
2014-07-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is datsla, datslahotmail of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with eName Technology Co., Ltd. ...Even though the Disputed Domain Name resolved to a parking website, it is obviously a holding website and qualifies as passive holding of the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2015-01-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fang Jennifer, Thailand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the DX trademark. The
only difference is that the disputed domain name includes the additional term “freight services”.
...
2022-11-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is suzanne brun, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...There is no evidence
that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name as a trademark or acquired trademark rights
or is commonly known by the disputed domain name. ...
2024-01-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sungkwan Cho (조성관), Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gabia, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In its informal communication of
March 9, 2023, the Respondent stated that the disputed domain name was not activated, asked the
Complainant to prove how the disputed domain name adversely impacted the Complainant, and told the
Complainant to buy the disputed domain name “in a legitimate way”. ...
2023-05-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Jun Luo, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...Complainant filed an amended
Complaint against only the disputed domain name on February 27, 2023.
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-04-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mustapha Jatta, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
Respondent is CHervinchuk Maksim Nikolaevich of Kiev, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent has not been authorized to use Complainant’s AEG trademark, neither as a domain name nor in any other way. Also, there is no reason to believe that Respondent’s name somehow corresponds with the disputed domain name.
...
2015-10-13 - Case Details
The Complainant also states that, even considering that the Respondent is not currently using the disputed domain name, it could find no other possible legitimate use of the disputed domain name, and countless UDRP decisions confirmed that passive holding of a domain name with knowledge that the domain name infringes another party's trademark rights is evidence of bad faith registration and use. ...As to the use of the disputed domain name, it does not resolve to an active website at the time of the drafting of this Decision. However, it is well established that passive holding of a domain name could amount to bad faith under certain circumstances as decided, i.a., in Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2017-02-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is MustNeed.com of Taipei, Taiwan, Province of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Moniker Online Services, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Thus, the consensus view is that paragraph 4(c) shifts the burden of production to the respondent to come forward with evidence of a right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name, once the complainant has made a prima facie showing. See, e.g., Document Technologies, Inc. v. ...
2018-06-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Roman Shrestha, Nepal.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-05-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is VPX LTD, VPX Solutions, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...KG, Aldi Stores Limited v. VPX LTD, VPX Solutions
Case No. D2025-1828
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-07-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is VPX LTD, VPX Solutions, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...KG, Aldi Stores Limited v. VPX LTD, VPX Solutions
Case No. D2025-1827
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-07-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Corsicari Female, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...These registrations predate the registration of the disputed domain name.
The Complainant operates the domain name , which it uses to offer its services.
...
2025-07-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mesut Erdogan, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Jean Amazan v. mesut erdogan
Case No. D2025-0220
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-03-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Chunyun Fu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Joseph Barro, Joseph Barro, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Yuri Chumak/
Yuri Chumak
Sole Panelist
Date: February 4, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sodexo v. ...
2025-02-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mustafa Gunes, BebeConfort, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-02-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Esther Stucky, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-08-30 - Case Details