Further, paragraph 3(c) of the Rules provides that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder. Under the Rules, the respondent “means the holder of a domain name registration against which a complaint is initiated”.
...See also Averitt Express, Inc. v. Protection of Private Person / Roman Emec,
WIPO Case No. D2018-0249, and cases cited therein.
In addition, paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy lists the situation when the respondent has registered the disputed domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that the respondent has engaged in a pattern of such conduct. ...
2021-11-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio
Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The addition of the
abbreviation “al” at the head of the disputed domain name does not distinguish the disputed domain name
from the Complainant’s VRBO mark, as VRBO is clearly identifiable and the primary and dominant element
of the disputed domain name.
...
2022-06-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is wangding fu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with DOMAIN NAME
NETWORK PTY LTD (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, that the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to the Domain Name, and that the Domain
Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2023-04-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liu Fen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant holds valid SMARTNEY trademark registrations. The Domain Name incorporates this
trademark in its entirety. As numerous UDRP panels have held, incorporating a trademark in its entirety is
sufficient to establish that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that trademark (see PepsiCo,
Inc. v. ...
2023-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michael Nguyen, S-Cosmetics, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon
which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows, WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain
name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2023-08-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ibunor Hope of Warri, Nigeria, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 Internet AG (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2017-07-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is YIWEI REN, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 4.3.
Moreover, the Complainant owns the domain name that serves as the official website of the
Complainant. The disputed domain name is almost identical to the Complainant’s domain name, so the
impression is that the Complainant owns or manages the disputed domain name.
...
2025-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Farrukh Hussain, Web Solution Provider, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: July 26, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry FH v. Farrukh Hussain, Web Solution Provider
Case No. D2024-2446
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-07-30 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was therefore registered without any trade mark significance.
The Respondent has a legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. ...D2000-0624; Croatia Airlines d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0455).
The Respondent has failed to show that it has acquired any legitimate trade mark rights in respect of the disputed domain name or that the disputed domain name is used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
...
2010-04-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bonded Labs, Bonded Labs, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name has been advertised for sale for USD 22,5000 on the Registrar’s WhoIs result for
the disputed domain name.
...
2023-01-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trademark, LAMBORGHINI. Firstly, the Complainant holds that the specific Top-Level Domain (TLD) does
not affect the domain name to determine the identity or confusing similarity of a domain name and a
trademark. ...
2023-10-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Farhan Raditya, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant acquired this domain name in
January, 2020 and currently owns this domain name. The Complainant also owns and operates other
domain names featuring its registered CHIME mark, including and .
...
2023-04-12 - Case Details
The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith.
The disputed domain name is not actively used instead a message indicating that the webpage is unavailable will appear when the disputed domain name is entered into a search engine. However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2015-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Murphy, United States of America (“United States” or “US”)
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-06-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is alex smith, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-08-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is John, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Le Huy Nang, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-
Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name, since it has not been authorized by the Complainant to register the disputed domain
name or to use its trademark within the disputed domain name, it is not commonly known by the disputed
domain name, and it is not making either a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate
noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2024-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Olivier Boma, ratp compta, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Stephanie Johnson, Prim n Proper Co, United States of America (“U.S.”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant owns since 1993.
The Domain Name was registered on March 2, 2023. The Domain Name has resolved to a parking page
containing commercial links.
5. ...
2024-07-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Phill Leger, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant cites the “passive holding” doctrine that derives from Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003 ("it is possible, in certain circumstances, for inactivity by the Respondent to amount to the domain name being used in bad faith"). ...
2021-06-29 - Case Details