About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 58508   document(s)s (0.102 sec)

Rows

<<  <  37941 - 37960  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0665 for net2phones.net html (14 KB)

As Complainant points out, panels have held that the domain name being a plural of a trademark renders this domain name confusingly similar (which was decided for the domain names "victoriassecrets.net" (Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al. v. ARTCO, Inc., NAF File No. FA 94342 (May 9, 2000)) as well as the domain name "playnetworks.com" (Vanguard Medica Limited v. Theo McCormick, WIPO Case No. D2000-0067 (April 3, 2000)). ...

2000-08-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2023-0039 for best-hall.eu pdf (144 KB)

The Respondent is SM FAME-HALL Marta Dobrowolska, Poland. 2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains (“EURid” or the “Registry”). ...Complainant The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is identical to its BEST-HALL trademark and also that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s European Union trademarks, since the disputed domain name incorporates BEST-HALL in its entirety. ...

2023-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3112 for corbevax.com pdf (137 KB)

The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America (“USA”) / Young Jin Hong, ITL, Republic of Korea. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Ltd v. Domains By Proxy, LLC / Young Jin Hong, ITL Case No. D2022-3112 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2022-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1512 for 99iqos.com, iqos.link html (15 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The addition of the suffixes, “.link” and “.com”, which are generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), can be disregarded as a technical requirement of every domain name registration. See Groupon, Inc. v. ...

2019-08-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1320 for ihategunbroker.com html (26 KB)

Respondent is Donald Baker (“Respondent”), an individual residing in Shelbyville, United States of America.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The domain name at issue is (the “Disputed Domain Name”). ...Therefore, the domain name is operated and controlled by Complainant. On April 12, 2007, Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name .   5. ...

2007-11-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1989 for isodiolcbd.net, isodiolcbd.org, isodioldirect.com html (27 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...Respondent stated in his email to Complainant that he is a “domain name investor” and included a sales pitch stating that the real issue is not how much the domain name cost but how much value the right domain name can bring to Complainant’s business. ...

2017-12-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1350 for banco-di-napoli.com html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Alessio Beltrami of Milan, Italy. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. 3. ...The Domain Name was registered on June 8, 2011. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its BANCO DI NAPOLI trademarks and domain names. ...

2011-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0077 for skandia-fonder.com pdf (163 KB)

The Respondent is Martin Simon, Sweden. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on November 14, 2024. At the time the Complainant found the disputed domain name, it redirected to the Complainant’s own website at “www.skandia.se”. ...

2025-02-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3906 for insta-stories.site pdf (142 KB)

The Respondent is Sergiy Dotsenko, Ukraine. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Respondent The Respondent is an individual resident in Ukraine. C. The Disputed Domain Name The disputed domain name was registered on September 29, 2023. D. ...

2024-11-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0373 for dillardsuggs.com html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Xue Dongpang of Huangzhou Ou, Chongging, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Although the assessment of confusing similarity in cases such as this involving two trademarks combined in a domain name will inevitably turn on their particular facts, this approach is consistent with the panel’s approach in this regard in Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A. v. ...

2013-04-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2291 for httplinkedin.com pdf (138 KB)

The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2023-08-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1797 for aquataliabrand.com pdf (186 KB)

The Respondent is avafza urgtk, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2025-07-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-0895 for vivacethestove.com pdf (136 KB)

The Respondent is emir kurt, Turkey. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-04-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4328 for halli-burtonintl.biz pdf (139 KB)

Respondent is Sean Johnson, SJOHNSON, USA. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Steinhardt Sole Panelist Date: December 16, 2024 https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/ ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Sean Johnson, SJOHNSON Case No. D2024-4328 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2024-12-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1633 for montecarlosbet.online pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is RICARDO freire barros, rastriei, Brazil. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-06-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3041 for humminbirdfishfinder.com pdf (141 KB)

The Respondent is anika liando, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Cosmotown, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2025-09-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3226 for outdoorvoicesespaña.com pdf (140 KB)

The Respondent is Elliot Houghton, Italy. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Paknic (Private) Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3448 for traffixservices.com pdf (138 KB)

The Respondent is Eduardo De Grijze, Travelers of america, United States. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Complainant operates a website at “www.traffix.com” in association with the domain name with a registration date in 1996. The disputed domain name was registered on July 8, 2015. ...

2024-10-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2173 for qwikqlik.com pdf (190 KB)

The Respondent is Jonathan Liani, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2024-07-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3801 for fisherinvesments.com, fsherinvestments.com pdf (140 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...The Panel finds the suppression of the letter “t” in the disputed domain name and the suppression of the first letter “i” in the disputed domain name still makes the Complainant’s mark recognizable within the disputed domain names. ...

2023-11-03 - Case Details