The Respondent is Jing Chen, PPP, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-06-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Valerie Jones, Moderna, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The disputed domain name
is also confusingly similar to the Complainant’s domain name. Under these circumstances, the Panel finds
that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith. ...
2024-06-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Nitish Gupta, Aeromax travels private limited, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The same parties were involved in at least one previous dispute regarding the domain name , decided in the favour of the Complainant. See Skyscanner Limited v. Nitish Gupta / Aeromax travels private limited, FORUM Claim No. ...
2020-06-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / Geroge Manaros, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The addition of the descriptive terms “e-” and “products” does not avoid confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademarks. In this regard, it is the general view among UDRP panels that the addition of merely dictionary, descriptive or geographical words to a trademark in a domain name is normally insufficient in itself to avoid a finding of confusing similarity under the first element of the UDRP (for example, Ansell Healthcare Products Inc. v. ...
2019-09-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted.1
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant requests the transfer of the disputed domain name on the grounds that:
- The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights;
- The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
- The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2017-05-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yüksel Kambal of Istanbul, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It holds national and international registrations for the Trade Mark and submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark.
The Complainant alleges that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name because it has no trade mark rights; is not known by the disputed domain name; and the use of the disputed domain name involves an unauthorized use of the Trade Mark.
...
2019-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eldar Kerimov, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has also used a
page 3
privacy service to register the Domain Name. Moreover, the Domain Name is not being used for any
genuine activities, considering the fact that the Registrant uses the Domain Name to offer pornographic
content and prostitution services. ...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
Customer 0163945792, Canada / Camaara Ford, CarteLeclerc,
United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The
mere addition of the French term “carte” (“card” in English) within the disputed domain name does not lessen
the inevitable confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark LECLERC.
...
2022-06-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Elad Gil, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The
Complainant contends that by using SOLVAY in the disputed domain name, the Respondent creates
confusion as consumers may believe that this disputed domain name refers to the Complainant.
...
2024-06-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nikita KOLESNIKOV, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NETIM SARL (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. The only difference between the
Complainant’s mark and the disputed domain name lies in the hyphen between the words “boost” and
“casino” in the disputed domain name. ...
2024-07-24 - Case Details
On February 9, 2022, the Respondent purchased the rights to the disputed domain name for USD 1,008,925
which was, at that time, the third highest domain name sale in 2022.
...Paragraph 1 of the Rules defines “Reverse Domain Name Hijacking” to be “using the Policy in bad faith to
attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name”.
...
2023-09-11 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MUITAS LTD v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2025-2043
1. The Parties
The Complainant is MUITAS LTD, United States of America (“US”), represented by Silverstein Legal, US.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...
2025-07-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Crowd Consulting Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Limited v. Crowd Consulting Pte. Ltd.
Case No. D2025-1281
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-05-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Qasim Arshad, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on June 28, 2024.
The disputed domain name has previously resolved to a website advertising Internet, home phone, and
cable television services. ...
2025-03-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...- the alternative use of the disputed domain name by redirecting to the Complainant’s official website.
- the MX servers are activated in relation with the disputed domain name emails, suggesting that the
Respondent has the intention to likely use the disputed domain name to support email account.
...
2024-03-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xpo Web, Portugal.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent’s lack of rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, the absence of a
credible explanation for choosing the disputed domain name, reputation of the Complainant’s trademark
indicate that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith.
...
2025-01-24 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Swift Passport & Visa Services LLC v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name
Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2025-0204
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Swift Passport & Visa Services LLC, United States of America, represented by
McDonald Hopkins LLC, United States of America.
...Trotman
Sole Panelist
Date: February 28, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Swift Passport & Visa Services LLC v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2025-0204
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-03-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhu Bo, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...Jung Seeds Co. v. Zhu Bo
Case No. D2024-3509
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
The Complainant owns the domain name which was registered on October 29, 1997, and hosts its main website.
...
2024-11-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hemant Kaushik, USA TV NEWS CORP, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Such conduct does not amount to the use of
the Disputed Domain Name for a bona fine interest;
- details of the ownership of the Disputed Domain Name registration are kept private, which indicates
lack of rights and interests in the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2024-11-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eneh Sumadina, Afghanistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, the Complainant’s domain name is
used to address the official VALERO-website, for many years and long before the registration of the disputed
domain name.
...
2024-08-16 - Case Details