The Respondent is emir kurt, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-04-30 - Case Details
Respondent is Sean Johnson, SJOHNSON, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Steinhardt
Sole Panelist
Date: December 16, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Sean Johnson, SJOHNSON
Case No. D2024-4328
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is RICARDO freire barros, rastriei, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-06-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is anika liando, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Cosmotown, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain
Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Martin Simon, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Commerce Communications
Limited dba WebNic.cc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on November 14, 2024.
At the time the Complainant found the disputed domain name, it redirected to the Complainant’s own website
at “www.skandia.se”. ...
2025-02-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Elliot Houghton, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Paknic (Private) Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Eduardo De Grijze, Travelers of america, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant operates a website at “www.traffix.com” in association with the domain name
with a registration date in 1996.
The disputed domain name was registered on July 8, 2015.
...
2024-10-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sergiy Dotsenko, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent
The Respondent is an individual resident in Ukraine.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on September 29, 2023.
D. ...
2024-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jonathan Liani, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is deniz altunoglu, Rakip Marketing, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-01-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator - Dvlpmnt Marketing, Inc., of Charlestown, Nevis, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with DNC Holdings, Inc. ...Based upon the submitted evidence, the Panel finds that the Respondent had knowledge of the Complainant's mark and its rights therein at the time the Respondent registered the Domain Name. This finding is supported by the evidence showing that: (i) the Complainant's mark has a strong reputation and is widely known; (ii) the Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations used in connection with a variety of goods and services throughout the world; (iii) the Domain Name was registered and transferred well after the first use in commerce by the Complainant of the Complainant's mark; (iv) the Respondent's website incorporates other trademarks owned by the Complainant; (v) the Domain Name is virtually identical to the Complainant's own domain name , which was registered well prior to the Respondent registering the Domain Name in dispute; and (vi) the Complainant owns several other domain names that include the mark BIOMERIEUX, that direct to sites promoting the Complainant's goods and services.
...
2014-12-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...According to prior UDRP panel decisions, it is sufficient that a complainant shows prima facie that a
respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in a domain name in order to shift the burden of production to
the respondent (see Croatia Airlines d.d. v. ...
2023-03-16 - Case Details
page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...However, the Panel notes that on the date of this Decision, the disputed domain names direct to inactive
websites. In this regard, the Panel finds that holding a domain name passively, without making any use of it,
also does not confer any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names on the Respondent (see
in this regard earlier UDRP decisions such as Bollore SE v. ...
2023-11-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Steve Slobodzian, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The evidence suggests that the disputed domain name was newly registered by
the Respondent after the Complainant moved on to a new domain name. ...
2023-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted1.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
1 The Respondent appears to have used the name of a third party when registering the disputed domain name. ...
2023-10-31 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple
disputed domain name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder. ...
2024-06-24 - Case Details
D2020-1580.
The disputed domain name was registered on October 4, 2021. Presently, no active webpage resolves from the disputed domain name.
5. ...The Respondent claimed it was not the ultimate owner of the disputed domain name. However, the Panel notes that the Registrar has confirmed the Respondent’s name and email address for the registrant of the disputed domain name. ...
2022-02-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is The Carphone Warehouse Limited, London, United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed Domain Name is registered with Namebay.
3. ...The rationale for this view is perhaps
best illustrated by the decision in Arthur Guinness Son & Co. (Dublin)
Limited v Dejan Macesic, WIPO Case
No. D2000–1698, in which it was said:
‘The Respondent does not deny that the disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the GUINNESS trademark. ...
2005-08-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alexandr Zaharov, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...He must have acquired the disputed domain name in order to profit from traffic generated by the fame of the mark (see Rug Doctor LP v. Domain Strategy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-01-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tony Aldo, Israel.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with INWX GmbH & Co. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-23 - Case Details