The Respondent is yaoyu wen, 个人, Philippines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is using the disputed domain
name to engage in illegitimate domain name monetization by means that include web traffic diversion and
advertisement in association with the website to which the disputed domain name resolves.
...
2025-02-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kyrylo Kirieiev, Kazakhstan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence that the Respondent is commonly known
by the disputed domain name, or that the Respondent has made any legitimate use of the disputed domain
name. Using the disputed domain name for a website that refers to services covered by the Complainant’s
trademark registration is misleading as to the commercial source of the disputed domain name and risks
tarnishing the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2024-10-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is David Czinczenheim, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domains Etc LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant has not licensed or otherwise authorized the Respondent
to use the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name resolves to a website where it is listed for sale at the price of EUR 600. ...
2023-06-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kaori Tsuji, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See also Tesco Stores Limited v. M.F,
WIPO Case No. DCO2013-0017, ).
Ignoring the TLD “.com” in the case of the SALESFORCE mark but not in the case of the SALESFORCE.COM mark, the Domain Name comprises only the SALESFORCE Marks except that the Domain Name ends with the letter “c” instead of the letter “e”.
...
2020-01-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy enumerates several ways in which a respondent may demonstrate rights or
legitimate interests in a disputed domain name:
“Any of the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Panel to be
proved based on its evaluation of all evidence presented, shall demonstrate your rights or legitimate
interests to the domain name for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(ii):
(i) before any notice to you of the dispute, your use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the
domain name or a name corresponding to the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering
of goods or services; or
(ii) you (as an individual, business, or other organization) have been commonly known by the domain
name, even if you have acquired no trademark or service mark rights; or
(iii) you are making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for
commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at
issue.”
...
2022-05-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The service was launched in 2009.
The disputed domain name was registered on July 5, 2011 and the disputed domain name was registered on February 18, 2010.
5. ...
2018-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America (“USA”) / Young Jin Hong, ITL,
Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Ltd v. Domains By Proxy, LLC / Young Jin Hong, ITL
Case No. D2022-3112
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-10-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Name (registered to the Third Respondent) was also likely resolving to the same website to which the Disputed Domain Name (also registered to the Third Respondent) was resolving. ...
2017-03-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Rana Yar, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. d/b/a subreg.cz (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. First, Respondent registered the
disputed domain name on March 10, 2023, long after Complainant’s (a) first use of its mark, (b) registrations
of the mark, and (c) first use of the domain name. ...
2023-05-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hammer Ha, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...While the Respondent used the name “qatarenergy” for the purposes of registering the disputed domain
name, that does not in itself give rise to rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name,
particularly as the Respondent’s name has been disclosed as, “Hammer Ha”, which bears no similarities to
the disputed domain name at all.
...
2023-08-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tao Wei of Shangrao, Jiangxi, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2017-10-02 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The second domain name in this dispute, , is registered in the name of 50448207 Qiang Pa [ . . . ] @live.com, whereas the other two domain names in this dispute, i.e. ...
2012-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that,
(1) the disputed domain name is nearly identical to the Complainant’s trademark registration and
corresponding domain except that the disputed domain name has removed the letter “y” at the end of the
mark;
(2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2024-12-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Garaj Dezoxin, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names (the “Domain Name 1”) and
(the “Domain Name 2”) (collectively referred to as the “Domain Names”) are
registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Piotr Nowaczyk/
Piotr Nowaczyk
Sole Panelist
Date: May 1, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Carrefour SA v. Garaj Dezoxin
Case No. D2025-1031
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-05-05 - Case Details
Respondent is song lin, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The entirety of the Mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hao Zhang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...case=D2000-1470
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Zhang Hao v. Hao Zhang
Case No. D2025-3357
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alessio Beltrami of Milan, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on June 8, 2011.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its BANCO DI NAPOLI trademarks and domain names.
...
2011-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xue Dongpang of Huangzhou Ou, Chongging, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Although the assessment of confusing similarity in cases such as this involving two trademarks combined in a domain name will inevitably turn on their particular facts, this approach is consistent with the panel’s approach in this regard in Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A. v. ...
2013-04-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-08-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is avafza urgtk, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-07-24 - Case Details