Respondent is scott mahoney, careers pmi, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant’s mark is not identical to the disputed domain name. However, the entire mark is reproduced
within the disputed domain name following the term “careers.” ...
2026-01-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is David Minor, SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-29 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2025-01-22 - Case Details
Respondent is Christopher Gathright of San Francisco, California, United States, represented by Burgoyne Law Group, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy, the complainant must make at least a prima facie showing that the respondent possesses no rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name (Malayan Banking Berhad v. Beauty, Success & Truth International,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1393). ...
2018-05-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Company Office Net SARL, represented by Michel Rohmer, Erstein, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is and is registered with iHoldings.com Inc. d/b/a DotRegistrar.com
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...
2003-09-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant
has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Myron Shuvalov, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...While the website linked to the disputed domain name appears to promote a casino and gaming app named
“Bexo Super Soft”, the Complainant is correct in its contention that the disputed domain name does not
reflect that name. ...
2025-10-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, of California, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom.
3. ...It is well recognized in previous cases under the Policy that where such a mark is incorporated in its entirety within a domain name, the addition of one or more generic words, or in this case a single letter, will not distinguish that domain name from the mark (see, for example, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. ...
2008-05-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is PUSAT CUAN, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, nor does it use
the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide of fering of goods or services. ...
2024-01-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alejandro Alberto Ruiz Morillo, Mexico.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-08-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mikyeong Kim, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Megazone Corp., dba HOSTING.KR
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that:
(a) the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s trademark NOZOIL.
(b) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and
(c) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2025-07-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Pratt, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ronald Mawejje, Uganda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cosmotown, Inc.
...Pereira dos Santos
Sole Panelist
Date: October 21, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Ashland Inc. v. Ronald Mawejje
Case No. D2025-3517
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-23 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple
disputed domain name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
...
2024-02-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on July 21, 2025 and the disputed
domain name on July 11, 2025 (Annex A1 and A2 to the Complaint).
...
2025-12-10 - Case Details
Such price requested for the transfer of the Disputed Domain Name
also evinces bad faith; prior UDRP Panels have determined that such an exorbitant figure “does not reflect
the intrinsic value of the disputed domain name apart from its association with the Complainant’s
trademarks” (MAGT Holding B.V. v. ...In fact, the Respondent has
linked the Disputed Domain Name to a purchasable domains parked page advertising the Disputed Domain
Name for public sale, and this cannot be considered a bona f ide use of the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2025-08-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ciaran Canning, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on October 17, 2021.
The Complainants submit that the disputed domain name has not resolved to any active website. ...
2022-04-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ciaran Canning, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on October 17, 2021.
The Complainants submit that the disputed domain name has not resolved to any active website. ...
2022-04-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Frederik Schmid of Luleå, Sweden / MyPrivacy.net Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario Canada,
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with EasyDNS Technologies Inc. ...The Panel notes that a prior panel made an equivalent finding in Johnson Controls Inc. v. Hansen,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1247 in which case the domain name was held to be confusingly similar to the complainant’s “Optima Batteries” trade mark.
...
2014-02-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Charles Lu, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domain.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name was registered on May 4, 2022. The Domain Name currently does not resolve to a
website. As of October 11, 2022, however, the Domain Name resolved to a website purporting to offer
college application services to consumers. ...
2023-03-02 - Case Details