The Respondent is Criss Moses, South Africa.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name also incorporates
Complainant’s company name and that of its affiliate. The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.org” should
be disregarded.
...
2023-06-19 - Case Details
Zoyo of Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...v) The Complainant’s assertion that the Respondent’s claim that the disputed domain name was bought “a few years ago” is false and in bad faith as the WhoIs shows that it was acquired by the Respondent on April 18, 2018.
...
2018-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bufen B, Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims that:
(a) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark;
(b) the Respondent lacks any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and
(c) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2023-01-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is MCO Associate, Inc., Warren Turner of Georgia, United States of America internally represented by itself.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register.com.
3. ...On this part of the inquiry, what is required is simply a comparison of the Domain name itself to the Complainant’s proven trademark rights: see for example Disney Enterprises, Inc. v John Zuccarini, Cupcake City and Cupcake Patrol,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-06-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted1 .
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Limited. v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2020-11-25 - Case Details
Respondent is Private Registrant, c/o Gandi SAS of Paris, France / Mike Hello of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with SIDN through Gandi (the "Registrar").
3. ...See Amanresorts Ltd., Amanresorts Int'l Pte Ltd v. Scott B. Myer,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1354 (respondent did not have a legitimate purpose where "the only purpose of having registered the disputed domain name, was to divert traffic intended for the [c]omplainant's website to its own"). ...
2017-06-09 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...See B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. / Joseph Gross,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0842. The threshold for satisfying this first element is low and generally UDRP panels have found that fully incorporating the identical mark in a disputed domain name is sufficient to meet the threshold.
...
2018-08-06 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple
disputed domain name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
...
2025-06-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gurpreet Purewal, Voltas Engineering of Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, represented by CGM Lawyers, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2017-03-29 - Case Details
He has given his title as Vice President.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is "aolbuys.com". The domain name was first registered on August 16, 2000. ...Domain name is confusingly similar to registered trademark
The domain name "aolbuys.com" is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks AOL and AOL.COM. ...
2001-03-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alliedbuildingproducts.com c/o Whois Identity Shield of Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with
Nameview Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2006-09-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Diane Payne, Superior Travel Service, Inc., United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-08-21 - Case Details
Respondent is Carl Boyle, infinitydesigns.technology, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2024-08-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Qing Ma of Luxi, Yunnan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Jiangsu Bangning Science & technology Co. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-06-29 - Case Details
The disputed domain name redirects to the Complainant’s official website.
The disputed domain name was registered on February 11, 2019.
5. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As stated in many decisions rendered under the Policy (e.g. Robert Ellenbogen v. Mike Pearson,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0001), both conditions, registration and used in bad faith, must be demonstrated; consequently, the Complainant must show that:
- the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent in bad faith, and
- the disputed domain name is being used by the Respondent in bad faith.
...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bouya Samir, Germany.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
The disputed domain name is registered with OVH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...- As previous panels have found, typosquatting does not constitute a legitimate use of the Disputed Domain Names (see, e.g., Edmunds.com, Inc. v. Yingkun Guo, dba This domain is 4 sale,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0694; Barnes & Noble College Bookstores, Inc. v. ...
2015-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yun Xing, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-06-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Walter Salazar, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The former owner of the Trade Mark registered the
disputed domain name in 2005 and used it to sell clothing. The disputed domain name was hacked, so that
it could not be accessed. ...
2026-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Drake Stephens Keith, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be canceled.
/Fabrizio Bedarida/
Fabrizio Bedarida
Sole Panelist
Date: August 31, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
CTM Management S.p.z.o.o v. ...
2023-09-11 - Case Details