The Respondent is 胡可 (Hu Ke), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DNSPod, Inc. ...The Respondent also has not made a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name without intent for commercial gain as the disputed domain name points to an inactive website; and
(c) The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2021-09-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the first and second amended Complaints satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph10(e) of the UDRP Rules grants a panel the power to consolidate multiple domain name disputes. At the same time, paragraph 3(c) of the UDRP Rules provides that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2019-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kyoung S Park, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TurnCommerce, Inc. ...See Omega Pharma Innovation & Development NV v Kyoung S Park, WIPO Case No. D2020-0849.”
The Complainant has not licensed or authorized the Respondent to use its SIMATIC mark, whether in a
domain name or otherwise.
5. ...
2022-12-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ching Yin Tsang, Ching Tsang, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Web Address
Registration Pty Ltd.
3. ...There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name. The
Respondent is not commonly known as the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name.
...
2023-02-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muneer Mohamed of Cairo, Egypt.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with eNom (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Registrar also provided the contact information held on its WhoIs database in respect of the Domain Name, confirming that the Respondent is the registrant of the Domain Name.
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2015-07-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Perfect Privacy, LLC of Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America ("USA") / Henry Stout of Toronto, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Register.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Registrar replied on May 12, 2018, confirming that the Domain Name was registered through it, but stating that the current registrant is Henry Stout. The Registrar also confirmed that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP") applies and that the Domain Name would remain locked during this proceeding. ...
2018-07-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is kgrosven oryellomg, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-04-23 - Case Details
Respondent is jeyu map, global, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant contends that Respondent has no legitimate interest in the disputed domain name because
Respondent has no rights to the disputed domain name of which Complainant is aware and Complainant has
not given any permission to Respondent to use the disputed domain name.
...
2024-07-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Previous UDRP panels have found that the Complainant’s ARAMCO trademark is famous worldwide. See Saudi Arabian Oil Co. v. Lim Sang Woon,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2212.
The Complainant holds the domain name registered since 1994 which redirects to its main website “www.saudiaramco.com”.
...
2020-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is YangZhiChao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 22net, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: June 27, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
BuDhaGirl, LLC v. YangZhiChao
Case No. D2022-1362
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History...
2022-07-01 - Case Details
Respondent is nihat akgul, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Atak Domain Hosting Internet ve Bilgi Teknolojileri Limited Sirketi d/b/a Atak Teknoloji (the “Registrar”).
3. ...First, numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. PEPSI, SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.I.) and EMS Computer Industry (a/k/a EMS),
WIPO Case No. ...
2022-02-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Qiu Xiaofeng, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Paknic (Private) Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be cancelled.
/Masato Dogauchi/
Masato Dogauchi
Sole Panelist
Date: November 16, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ABG Hunter LLC v. ...
2023-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Qiu Xiaofeng, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Paknic (Private) Limited (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be cancelled.
/Masato Dogauchi/
Masato Dogauchi
Sole Panelist
Date: November 16, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ABG Hunter LLC v. ...
2023-11-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Franck James of Opdyke, Illinois, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google Inc. ...However, as first stated in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000‑0003, and repeated in many subsequent decisions under the UDRP: “the concept of a domain name ‘being used in bad faith’ is not limited to positive action; inaction is within the concept. ...
2019-03-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alexander Johnson, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-03-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is annie Macedo, LuxairGroup, Bulgaria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name is identical to the ROCSYS Mark.
b) There are no rights or legitimate interests held by the Respondent in respect of the Domain Name.
...
2024-02-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michael Stack, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...After a complainant has made a prima facie case, the burden of production shifts to a respondent to present
evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. See, e.g., Croatia Airlines d.d. v.
Modern Empire Internet Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2003-0455.
...
2024-02-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Valerie Rossel, Rossel, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is wani iwan, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Respondent’s name does not correspond to the disputed domain name, and there is no evidence to
support a finding that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name within the meaning
of paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2025-12-09 - Case Details
Respondent is Ai Lin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g. PepsiCo, Inc. v. PEPSI, SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.I.) and EMS Computer Industry (a/k/a EMS),
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-05-06 - Case Details