The Respondent is David Holm, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name resolves to an inactive site.
The Complainant’s trademark registrations predate the registration of the disputed domain name.
5. ...
2021-05-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Luis Mendez, Mexico.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant cites Groupe Adeo v. Peter Garcia, Leroy Merlin,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1451, finding that the LEROY MERLIN mark is well known and that it was implausible that the respondent had a legitimate explanation for registering a domain name incorporating it. ...
2021-04-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Gabe Smith, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Go
Daddy Software.
3. ...ii) Use in bad faith
For the Complaint to succeed, it also has to prove that the Respondent is using the domain name in bad faith.
The Administrative Panel in Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows
(WIPO Case No. ...
2005-08-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Phalanx SEO Services / Protected Domain Services - Customer ID: NCR-2606953 of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2011-01-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kayley Crosby, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Squarespace Domains II LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain
Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mariette Garreau, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DDD Technology Pte. ...The disputed domain name was registered on July 19, 2023.
The disputed domain name does not point to an active website and generates an error page.
5. ...
2023-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ivan Bochkarev, Seo, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SUNBET trademark, as the latter is entirely
incorporated in the disputed domain name.
...
2024-11-14 - Case Details
Respondent is Whois Privacy Protection Foundation, Netherlands / Aurelius Mark, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Openprovider (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Therefore, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name.
Under the third element, Complainant alleges that the Domain Name has been used by Respondent in bad faith. ...
2020-01-20 - Case Details
Respondent is blingblingtickets of San Jose, California, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...Complainant contends that Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and is not making and does not intend to make a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.
...
2012-02-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wang Junjie of Sherman Oaks, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is suresh killo, orhami, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Then, the Complainant submits the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain
name since the Respondent is using the disputed domain name for illegitimate purposes which do not
equate to a bona fide offering of services in connection with the disputed domain name. ...
2025-10-21 - Case Details
Respondent is Michelin Man, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The Domain Name was registered on February 25, 2024. The Domain Name resolves to a website that
shows the MICHELIN MAN mascot and contains other content, including a “buy” hyperlink.
...
2024-05-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is fjskakak fkskksjdjsj, Singapore.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Craig Johnson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Hamilton
Sole Panelist
Date: September 26, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Particle Measuring Systems Inc. v. Craig Johnson
Case No. D2025-2978
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tom Shaffer, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The only difference between the disputed
domain name and the Complainant’s trademark is the addition of the generic Top-Level Domain “.website”
in the disputed domain name.
...
2024-09-30 - Case Details
Respondent is ahmed mahmoud fakhr eldin, webeasystep, Egypt.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Badgley
Sole Panelist
Date: June 20, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MARLINK SA v. ahmed mahmoud fakhr eldin, webeasystep
Case No. D2024-1591
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is GuangSheng Chen, ChenGuangSheng, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GMO Internet, Inc. d/b/a Discount-Domain.com and Onamae.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As noted above, the Respondent is not authorized to use the SPODE mark whether in a domain name or otherwise. The disputed domain name resolves to a website containing pornographic content. ...
2021-09-16 - Case Details
Duna, an individual resident in Budapest (Hungary).
2. Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is "zwackunicum.com", registered with Network Solutions Inc. ...This question is especially relevant concerning § 4.a (iii) of the Policy, according to which the domain name must not only be registered in bad faith, but it must also be used in bad faith. Its clear from the decision made in case No. 99-00001 Word Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. ...
2000-03-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Music Sales Group 8-9 Frith Street, London, W1V STZ, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is (Domain Name), which Domain Name is registered with Network Solutions, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Hurdon, Virginia, 20170 – 5139, USA (the Registrar).
3. ...In addition, the Respondent, which is in the music business, knew about the fact that the Domain Name incorporates the name of the famous composer Manuel De Falla.
On the other hand, the Respondent has acted with passive holding, which has
been repeatedly and consistently regarded by the Panels’ decisions as use in
bad faith, since the very early decision Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. ...
2001-12-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...For the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy, paragraph 4(b) of the Policy sets out a
non-exhaustive list of circumstances that shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical to the Complainant's trademarks AGGRENOX and COMBIVENT: "Indeed, the domain name includes in its entirety the Complainant's trademarks without any adjunction of letter or word. ...
2016-06-20 - Case Details