L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998) registering a domain name that dilutes a famous trademark with the intent of receiving payment in return for surrendering the domain name is actionable trademark dilution. ...In order to challenge a domain name registration, the trademark owner must provide NSI with proof that the domain name holder has been notified that use of the domain name infringes trademark rights. ...
2001-04-04 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...While the Respondent’s failure to file a Response does not automatically result in a decision in favor of the
Complainant, the Panel may draw appropriate inferences from the Respondent’s default (see, e.g., Verner
Panton Design v. Fontana di Luce Corp, WIPO Case No. D2012-1909)
Substantive Matters
In order to succeed in respect of each Disputed Domain Name the Complainant is required to show for the
Dispute Domain Name in question that all three of the elements set out under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy
are present. ...
2025-07-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Horoshiy, Inc., Curacao, Netherlands Antilles, Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameKing.com.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2004-11-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mumbai Domains of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with Fabulous.com Pty Ltd in Brisbane, Australia.
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name.
There is no authorisation for the Respondent to use the DIOR trademark, nor to incorporate it in a domain name nor to operate the website to which the Disputed Domain Name resolves. ...
2011-02-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is rania afaf, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...As regards the current inactive status of the Domain Name, the Panel finds that the current passive holding
of the Domain Name does not prevent a finding of bad faith. ...
2022-12-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yeon o Jung, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Megazone Corp., dba HOSTING.KR (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name resolves users to a domain name trading site
Dan.com where the disputed domain name is listed for sale for USD 5,000, and that the Respondent has
made no attempt to make legitimate use of the disputed domain name.
...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Luis Bertoldo, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...m) the current absence of use of the domain name may not be considered a good faith use of the
disputed domain name.
B. Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. ...
2023-07-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Dobbins, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-05-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Hass Kenneth, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Complainant contends Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name, is not
commonly known by the disputed domain name, has not used or prepared to use the disputed domain name
in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, and has not been authorized, licensed or
otherwise permitted by Complainant to register or use the disputed domain name.
...
2025-06-25 - Case Details
Respondent is X Y, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. ...The disputed domain name was registered on March 24, 2024. At filing of the Complaint, at the website of
the disputed domain name, visitors were prompted to enter their employee login information. ...
2024-05-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is mark hong, United States of America (“United States”)
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is linear assicura, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is 聂任飞, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-02-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is jiangli, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Complainant’s AGIPI trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vercel Whois, Vercel Inc., United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows
Domains Inc. .../Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: August 19, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Internet Services Australia 1 Pty Ltd v. Vercel Whois, Vercel Inc.
Case No. D2025-2701
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-08-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Theresa W Chavez, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name incorporates its mark and
save for the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”), it is identical to its domain name at .
...
2024-12-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is dafu zhang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the UOL mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vincent Gallo, SoI de Janeiro, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...USA) v. Vincent Gallo, SoI de Janeiro
Case No. D2024-3205
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-09-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Noufal Shihab, Kuwait.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the AGFA trademark is reproduced and is recognizable within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-07-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is jiangli, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-28 - Case Details