The Respondent is Host Master, Njalla Okta LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jofra Ayden, Lacmag, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting
Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...The Respondent knew of the Complainant when the Respondent registered the Domain Name. It follows
from the fame of the Complainant, but also the use of the Domain Name. The use of the Domain Name is
clear evidence of bad faith. ...
2025-08-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Egzy Gomez Jr, United
Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant’s LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB trademark is clearly recognizable in the disputed domain
name, rendering the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, and the
additional element, the word “academy" in the disputed domain name does not detract from this finding.
...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
The Registrant is Sprintzero Consulting Limited, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited (“IEDR”).
3. ...It is inconceivable that the Registrant incorporated the word “Linkedin” into the disputed domain name
without being fully aware of the Complainant.
Redirecting the disputed domain name to the Complainant’s own website implies bad faith in that it increases
the likelihood of confusion that the disputed domain name is connected with the Complainant’s mark.
1 See Linkedin Corporation and Linkedin Ireland Limited v. ...
2023-01-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hui Han, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rawls cynthia bernice, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on February 7, 2022. The disputed domain name currently does
not resolve to an active website.
5. ...
2022-04-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ferry Gunawan, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...E.g., Oki Data Americas, Inc v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903 (“Oki Data”). Therefore, the addition of the term “agen” does not alter the fact that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2022-02-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nathanniel Patrick Wijaya, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is David Jiang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Spaceship, Inc. .../Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: March 20, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG v. David Jiang
Case No. DAI2026-0007
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-03-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is gao shuan xiong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The
Respondent has not used or prepared to use the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide
offering of goods or services, and the Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name does not constitute a
legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name. ...
2026-05-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is sysadmin admin, balata.com ltd, Hong Kong, SAR of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gal Communications (CommuniGal) Ltd. d/b/a Galcomm.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2007-08-29 - Case Details
Respondent is Whois Agent / Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. of Kirkland, Washington, US / DNS Manager, Profile Group of Wilmington, Delaware, US, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...Respondent is profiting financially from the Domain Name, and chose the Domain Name to profit from the goodwill of Complainant’s Y8 marks.
...
2016-07-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Adam Smith, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Also, the use of a hyphen in the Disputed Domain Name does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity, see e.g. Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. blue crystal,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jose Vidal, Brazil, represented by Ribeiro Cavalcante Advocacia, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Unstoppable Domains Inc. ...Leppink
Sole Panelist
Date: April 27, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Eli Lilly and Company v. Jose Vidal
Case No. D2026-0828
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-04-29 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...On September 26, 2016, the Complainant registered the domain name and has used it since then for a website providing benefits information and services to its employees.
...
2017-05-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is lin yanxiao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The mere absence of any right or legitimate interest of the Respondent in the Domain Name
demonstrates that the Domain Name has not been registered or used in good faith. The Domain Name has
been put on sale by the Respondent and has never been used legitimately before. ...
2022-09-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Chunliu Lu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hong Kong Juming
Network Technology Co., Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, has not used or prepared to use the
Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services, and has not been authorized,
licensed, or otherwise permitted by the Complainant to register and/or use the Domain Name. ...
2023-09-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Thus, the first issue only concerns the part of the disputed domain name which consists of “qe2”.
The disputed domain name incorporates in full the distinctive trademark QE2. ...
2007-07-31 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...See B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. / Joseph Gross,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0842. The threshold for satisfying this first element is low and generally UDRP panels have found that fully incorporating the mark in a disputed domain name is sufficient to meet the threshold.
...
2018-08-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Xavier Tene, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <1xbet.bot> is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Navasard Limited v. Xavier Tene
Case No. D2024-0637
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-04-10 - Case Details