The Respondent is Ryan Dunn, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Using a domain name which includes a trademark to redirect to a website that competes with the trademark
owner is not bona fide use of the domain name.
...
2024-05-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Francisco Perez, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CloudFlare, Inc. ...The Complainant operates its primary business website at the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on December 1, 2023. ...
2024-03-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jefe Jefe, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Zadra-Symes
Sole Panelist
Date: January 21, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Empower Clinic Services, L.L.C., d/b/a Empower Pharmacy v. Jefe Jefe
Case No. D2024-4890
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-01-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is BIN ZHAO, medtronex.com, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The comparison of the disputed domain name to the Complainant’s trademark simply requires a visual and
aural comparison of the disputed domain name to the proven trademarks. ...
2025-02-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rio Hardina Putra of Audify, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is identical to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains By Proxy, LLC, Panama / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-01-06 - Case Details
Respondent is Yue Lan Chen, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name reproduces Complainant’s THE KOOPLES trademarks. In addition, the radical of the disputed domain name reproduces the radical of the domain name , operated by The Kooples Production, Complainant’s exclusive licensee. ...
2019-09-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is hao chen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...See International Hospitality Management – IHM S.p.A. v. Enrico Callegari Ecostudio,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0683.
The Respondent however has failed to file a response to prove his rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name under paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. ...
2019-08-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wang Yue Mei of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...According to the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (the “WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 1.7, “in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing” (see also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2019-06-21 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
American Airlines, Inc. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2024-3741
1. The Parties
The Complainant is American Airlines, Inc., United States of America (“US”), represented by Greenberg
Traurig, LLP, US.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
This form of variation does not prevent a finding of
confusing similarity under the first element. See Fenix International Limited v. Patrick Flensby, WIPO Case
No. D2022-0310. The Complainant’s trademark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name
(WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.8).
...The Panel has also considered the fact that the disputed domain names resolve to PPC pages which display
links to websites related to travel services. It has been well-established that where a domain name is used
to generate revenue in respect of “click through” traffic, and that traffic has been attracted because of the
name’s association with the Complainant, such use amounts to use in bad faith (SAP SE v. ...
2023-05-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Forrest Bailey, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant observes that the disputed domain name redirects users to a webpage where the disputed
domain name is being offered for sale at USD 1,450. ...
2023-02-10 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant alleges that the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
The Complainant accordingly requests the Panel to order transfer of the disputed domain name.
...
2019-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Almazs Robinson, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with
NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Trademark of the Complainant, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name,
and the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
Respondent is Bryce St. Martin, Saint Martin, US.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The disputed domain name was registered on August 30, 2023, and at the time of filing the Complaint, the
disputed domain name did not resolve to any website.
5. ...
2024-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sheikh Ukasha Elahi, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Visitors of the Respondent’s web pages at the disputed domain name might have
reasonably believed that the contents at the disputed domain name were official, while that was clearly not
the case.
...
2025-02-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is john Cater, Gambia (the).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As for use of the disputed domain name, the use of the disputed domain name to send fraudulent emails
impersonating the Complainant is very persuasive and clear evidence of the Respondent’s bad faith use of
the disputed domain name and typically the type of use the Policy is designed to tackle. ...
2024-06-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fledis Goncalves, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...In the present case, the Panel finds that the Respondent was more likely than not aware of the
Complainant’s trademarks when the Respondent registered the disputed domain name, as the
Complainant’s business, trademark registrations, and its domain name predate the registration date of the
disputed domain name. ...
2024-06-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-07-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Abhinav Mardia, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Thus, it cannot be inferred that the Respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of disputed
domain name. Moreover, the disputed domain name is offered for sale, which does not constitute a fair use
of the disputed domain name. ...
2023-02-27 - Case Details