The Respondent is Idah Idah, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Besides, the Complainant’s trademark registrations and domain names predate the registration date
of the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name redirects to different third-party websites. ...
2026-04-01 - Case Details
Julen, had been aware of, and/or had allowed the registration of the domain name , nor if it had been informed of or allowed Respondent's activities in the field of tourism, making use of said domain name. ...A letter dated May 28, 2008 written by Respondent's representative refers to a request by Claimant to recover the domain name. Respondent however informed Claimant in that letter that he wished to keep the domain name, to which it considers having a better right, based in particular on the fact that the contract explicitly recognizes Respondent's rights on the domain name. ...
2010-05-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard Inc, Panama / Linda Bonds, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The addition of a dictionary term to a complainant’s mark does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity, see Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Henry Chan,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0056. The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SKYFILE Mark. ...
2021-03-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hidayet Koca, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...case=D2008-1534
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
JaQuel Knight, J.K. Creatives, Inc. v. Hidayet Koca
Case No. D2025-1899
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-07-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...See Croatia Airlines d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0455. Once such a prima facie case is made, the burden shifts to the respondent to demonstrate that it has rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2016-04-11 - Case Details
Isenberg, Attorney at Law, LLC, United States.
The Respondent is Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp., Bahamas/ Katarzyna Bieniek, Poland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Internet Domain
Service BS Corp (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Such use of the Domain Name cannot and does not
constitute bona fide commercial use, sufficient to legitimize any rights and interests the Respondent might
have in the Domain Name and therefore the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain
Name under paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2022-08-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is 程飞 (Cheng Fei), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with 易介集团北京有限公司 (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant argues that the Disputed Domain Name is used in connection with an active website offering the Disputed Domain Name for sale, and it requires more than USD 450, which far exceeds the cost to register a “.com.cn” domain name, to purchase the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2021-11-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Douglas Archanjo Sobrinho of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-07-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Saeed Hassan, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Sav.com, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name has also been advertised for sale for a sum
considerably greater than any likely out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Respondent in registering the
Domain Name.
5. ...
2023-02-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
Once the complainant establishes a prima facie case that the respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests
in the disputed domain name, the burden of production shifts to the respondent to show that it has rights or
legitimate interests in respect to the disputed domain name (see WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.1).
...
2022-08-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ivan Stanojevic, Serbia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: June 23, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Kooperativa Förbundet ekonomisk förening v. Ivan Stanojevic
Case No. D2022-1314
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2022-06-30 - Case Details
E.g., Ferrari S.p.A. v.
JK Marketing, WIPO Case No. D2001-1003
(WIPO October 8, 2001). In this case, the Respondent’s behavior throughout this
dispute clearly constitutes its bad faith registration and use of the disputed
domain name."
...Complainant has not granted Respondent any license or consent, express or implied
to use the Complainant’s mark in a domain name or in any other manner. (See
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. v. Sookwan Park, WIPO
Case No. ...
2002-04-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Chinedu Utomi, DK BOSCH of Lagos, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-04-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Name Redacted.1
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The disputed domain name was registered on July 13, 2021.
The disputed domain name does not direct to an active website, rather it resolves to a parked page of the Registrar.
...
2021-12-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nnn Nam, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Leppink
Sole Panelist
Date: March 31, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Acciona, S.A. v. Nnn Nam
Case No. D2025-0570
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-04-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is TjR Solution, Advortex Solutions, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mohammad Amir Hossain Dewan, Magic-Payment, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: April 1, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LinkedIn Corporation v. ...
2024-04-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yuliya Artamonova, Kazakhstan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-04-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is sidelirza tghi zaadmfrd, Denmark.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach
GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Steven Ho, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Porkbun LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. .../Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: October 22, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lightricks Ltd. v. Steven Ho
Case No. D2025-3539
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-28 - Case Details