The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Name (registered to the Third Respondent) was also likely resolving to the same website to which the Disputed Domain Name (also registered to the Third Respondent) was resolving. ...
2017-03-10 - Case Details
Park of Gimhae-Shi, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with DropCatch.com 873 LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Furthermore, the Respondent is not using the Disputed Domain Name with a bona fide offering of goods or services and is not known by the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2019-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant states that the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith
as the disputed domain name comprises the Complainant’s trademark and is similar to the Complainant’s
domain name, leading to confusion for the customers. ...
2023-10-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Amre Salim, United Kingdom, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...However, as numerous panels have found, the failure to use a domain name does not prevent a finding of bad faith use under the doctrine of passive holding. See Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2022-01-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Muzyka A. A. of Kiev, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("Domain Name") is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...Taken the Respondent's previous use of the Domain Name and the fact that the Domain Name is identical to the Complainant's mark, the Panel finds implausible any good faith use of the Domain Name.
...
2018-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is JERRI BROWN of Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trade mark, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2016-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot, United States of America / Wu Yu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has not responded and the Panel is unable to conceive of any basis upon which the Respondent could sensibly be said to have any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000‑0003).
The Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the requirements of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy have been fulfilled.
...
2021-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jim West Cruises, Spring Valley, Illinois, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...See, e.g. Toyota Motor Sales USA v. Rafi Hamid dba ABC Automobile
Buyer (WIPO Case No. D2001-0032, March 28, 2001).
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides that a respondent can demonstrate a legitimate interest in a domain name by demonstrating one of the following facts:
(i) before receiving any notice of the dispute, the respondent used or made preparations to use the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services; or
(ii) the respondent has been commonly known by the domain name; or
(iii) the respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name without intent for commercial gain, to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark at issue.
...
2003-08-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is RBT, Inc., Ira Weinstein of Brooklyn, New York, United States of America, representing itself.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with eNom.
3. ...Although some panels have entirely rejected the legitimacy of a reseller's unauthorized use of a manufacturer's mark in a domain name, most decisions follow Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903.
The Oki Data panel concluded that a reseller using the manufacturer's mark in a domain name must actually offer goods or services associated with the mark, use the domain name to sell only goods or services associated with the mark, accurately disclose the reseller's relationship with the mark holder, and refrain from “cornering the market” on relevant domain names. ...
2010-03-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Kohler Credit Union v. Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o / Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante
Case No. ...The Respondent has been found to have registered and used domain names in bad faith in around 50 UDRP cases, including Rubik’s Brand Limited v. Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o. / Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-09-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Knud Wallberg/
Knud Wallberg
Sole Panelist
Date: August 2, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Sanofi v. ...
2022-08-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alex Poluh, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the CARREFOUR mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Audrey Rickal, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...For the Complainant the passive holding of the disputed domain name amounts to use in bad faith since:
- the Complainant’s trademark, which is entirely reproduced in the disputed domain name, has a strong
reputation and is well-known;
page 3
- the Respondent has provided no evidence whatsoever of any actual or contemplated good faith use
by it of the disputed domain name;
- the registration details of the registrant are private; and
- the disputed domain name is configured with MX and SPF records, allowing the use of the disputed
domain name for phishing attempts.
...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Purple Bucquet of Panama City, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Power Brand Center LLC.
3. ...See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Sergey Popov,
WIPO Case No.D2009-0983. (Bad faith was found where the domain name was registered and used with the intention of unfairly exploiting the goodwill of the trademark for the respondent's own advantage of attracting Internet customers to its website.)
...
2010-07-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Protection of Private Person of Moscow, Russian Federation / Kwin Amuch of Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Secondly, the Complainant submits that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant alleges that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. ...
2018-11-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is tian tan, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-12-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jin Xiao, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, be cancelled.
/Knud Wallberg/
Knud Wallberg
Sole Panelist
Date: June 9, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
AJE IPCO PTY LTD v. ...
2023-06-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is adam three, OWN, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Yiwei Ren, Yiwei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Atak Domain Hosting Internet ve Bilgi
Teknolojileri Limited Sirketi d/b/a Atak Teknoloji (the “Registrar”).
3. ...https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
FragranceX.com Inc. v. Yiwei Ren, Yiwei
Case No. D2025-4672
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Christian Sampson, Spain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sea Wasp, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Jeremy Speres/
Jeremy Speres
Sole Panelist
Date: July 23, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Farmbot Holdings Pty Ltd v. Christian Sampson
Case No. D2025-2145
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-07-25 - Case Details