Respondent is Pavel Kolosov, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is 林晓梦 (xiao meng lin), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with West263 International Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on January 18, 2020.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name has not been used.
5. ...
2020-03-27 - Case Details
e) Confirm that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy was in effect.
(f) Indicate the current status of the domain name.
...The Respondent has never requested that the domain name at issue be deleted from the domain name database. The Respondent has not sought to terminate his agreement with the Registrar. ...
2000-11-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirement
of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("the Policy"),
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("the Rules"),
and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
("the Supplemental Rules"). ...Complainant apparently
did not respond to these letters until February 28, 2002.
Respondent registered the Domain Name
("the second Domain Name") on June 4, 2001. The website corresponding
to this Domain Name appears identical to that corresponding to the first Domain
Name. ...
2002-06-17 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Accordingly, the Respondent cannot claim any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name is offered for sale for the amount of USD 800. This means that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name in bad faith, to realize a profit by offering it for sale immediately after its registration on July 8, 2012. ...
2012-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ethan Harper, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-07-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Moore, Resemin, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...By doing so, the Domain Name clearly mimics the
Complainant’s existing domain name and deliberately introduces a mistyping. ...
2022-10-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Protection, West Bay, Cayman Islands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Rebel.com Services Corp.
3. ...Such use is not consistent with bona fide offering of goods or services by the Respondent, as has been repeatedly decided in domain name arbitration proceedings (see e.g. Skyline Displays, Inc v. Whois Protection, NAF Case No. FA070500098907 (June 25, 2007)).
...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
The Complainant argues that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and it has not acquired any trademark rights related to the disputed domain name.
...Accordingly, the Panel determines that the language of this proceeding will be English. See Kravet, Inc. v. Vietnam Domain Privacy Services / Pham Dinh Nhut,
WIPO Case No. D2017-1397.
6.2. Substantive Issues
As per paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2017-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Domain Admin
Case No. D2024-5270
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-02-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant further states that the disputed domain name was registered, after the
filing of the original Complaint concerning the disputed domain name , as an attempt to
circumvent the Panel’s decision, by redirecting users to a website published at the newly registered the
disputed domain name.
...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Robert Brodi of Dunakeszi, Hungary, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The statement that the disputed domain name may be for sale together with the nature of the disputed domain name shows that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name to sell it to the Complainant in accordance with paragraph 4(b)(i) of the Policy.
...
2015-04-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Private Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft of Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and, according to the Complainant’s knowledge does not own any trade mark, company name or any other relevant rights to the name which corresponds to the disputed domain name.
...
2011-06-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jack Yong of Bari, Italy.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2017-11-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pythagoras FZE, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Communigal Communications Ltd. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-03 - Case Details
Ltd., Australia, self-represented.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names (first disputed domain name) and
(second disputed domain name) are registered with Netregistry Wholesale Pty Ltd (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...On May 27, 2019, the Respondent registered the business name Tea Gardens Ferry.
The first disputed domain name was registered on May 27, 2019. The second disputed domain name was
registered on April 16, 2023.
...
2023-09-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Abou Zakhm, Bernadette Selim, Canada.
2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains
(“EURid” or the “Registry”). ...ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
FxPro Financial Services Ltd v. Abou Zakhm, Bernadette Selim
Case No. DEU2022-0006
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
3. ...
2022-06-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In relation to the descriptive elements the part of the disputed domain name consisting of the word “swarovski” clearly dominates the disputed domain name. In making the comparison between the trademark and the disputed domain name the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix is usually disregarded. ...
2014-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Alison Pellizzari Carvalho, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is mstfi sdaght tlgrd, Iran (Islamic Republic of).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer Service Langenbach
GmbH dba Joker.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed
domain name. The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
The Complainant requested that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2023-07-10 - Case Details