The Respondent is kevin Liu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-16 - Case Details
Respondent is Laurence Bartell, Sustin Bartell Waldman & Fitzgerald, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (“Registrar”).
3. ...One of Complainant’s subsidiaries registered the domain name
in 2014.
The disputed domain name was created on May 1, 2019. At the time the Complaint was filed, it resolved to
a page on the Registrar’s website that indicated that the disputed domain name was available for sale and
led to another page listing the disputed domain name for sale for USD 50,000. ...
2025-01-02 - Case Details
Respondent is Pham Van Thai, EXIT Realty, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant uses its website
and emails associated with the domain name to communicate with customers and business
partners.
The disputed domain name was registered on July 1, 2025. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Victoria John, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain
name. The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name
was used to impersonate the Complainant. ...
2025-11-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Melvin Bennett, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the HMRC mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-06-26 - Case Details
Burn World-Wide, Ltd. d/b/a BGT Partners v.
Banta Global Turnkey Ltd WIPO Case No. D2010-0470.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed
domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...Rothnie
Sole Panelist
Date: October 20, 2023
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
WK Travel, Inc. v. John Doe
Case No. D2023-3353
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-10-26 - Case Details
Respondent is Juarez Momm of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...PepsiCo, Inc. v. PEPSI, SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.I.) and EMS Computer Industry (a/k/a EMS),
WIPO Case No. D2003-0696). The fact that the disputed domain name, moreover, includes the term “empresas” is not in contrast to such finding. ...
2019-01-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fundacion Private Whois of Panama, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet.bs Corp. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-07-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is lisajoanna235 Joanna, kpmg-oilandgas, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Van Caenegem
Sole Panelist
Date: November 25, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
KPMG International Cooperative v. lisajoanna235 Joanna, kpmg-oilandgas
Case No. D2022-3718
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2022-11-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is rldoe, derK,LLC, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Alibaba.com
Singapore E-Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of , or demonstrable
preparations to use, the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a
bona fide of fering of goods or services. ...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Viktor Temnyi, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting
Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...There is
no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired trademark
rights. There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain
Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or
services. ...
2024-10-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Halil Berk Kurt, Demag Power Jeneratör Enerji Güc Sistemleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret LTD.
STI, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Nics Telekomunikasyon A.S. ...The entirety of the DEMAG mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-04-19 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy sets out a list of non-exhaustive circumstances that may indicate that a domain
name was registered and used in bad faith, but other circumstances may be relevant in assessing whether a
respondent’s registration and use of a domain name is in bad faith. ...
2025-03-11 - Case Details
The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's WHITE RIBBON Trade Marks.
(b) The Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name, nor any name corresponding to it. ...Either way, the Panel finds that it is irrelevant that users may subsequently realize that the Disputed Domain Name is not associated with the Complainant once they land on the Respondent's website. As stated in Paris Hilton v. ...
2016-09-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is xing yun li, lixing yun, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CNOBIN Information Technology
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The
use of the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” in the disputed domain name does not dispel
confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the trade mark;
(b) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2022-11-01 - Case Details
Respondent is Ravish Kapila, New Zealand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent, according to the WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is located in New Zealand
and registered the disputed domain name on October 25, 2016. The disputed domain name resolves to a
website apparently under the control of the Registrar, where it is offered for online sale.
...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Michel Bracewell, Deux Design, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Launchpad.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-04-12 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Panel does not consider it to be significant that the Respondent had not yet used the disputed domain name for the purpose of any active website. The Respondent’s intentions in this regard were clear and the passive holding of a domain name does not preclude a finding of bad faith when the overall circumstances of the case point to that conclusion (Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2016-12-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Kenny Wright, Wright Media, LLC, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...As the AVERITT mark is clearly recognizable in the disputed domain name, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar for purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
...
2025-01-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is ANDRES VALLVERDU, Spain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-06-16 - Case Details