The Respondent is Christina Buzas, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the
disputed domain name; and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2024-02-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dow Wordwide, Dow WorldWide, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center responded on
March 12, 2025, that the disputed domain name was registered to the name “Dow Wordwide, Dow Worldwide” and asked if Dow owns
the disputed domain name. ...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is GOBI EBSCO Corporate Domains, Inc., United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with CV.
...There
is no evidence that the Respondent has registered the Domain Name as a trademark or acquired trademark
rights. There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain
Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or
services. ...
2024-12-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ethan Bonner, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Concepts
B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu. ...O., EOLabs LLC v. Ethan Bonner
Case No. DCO2025-0008
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-03-31 - Case Details
Respondent is Synopsys Ltd, Synopsys, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Pursuant to Complainant’s request to the Registrar to suspend the disputed domain name, the
disputed domain name has been placed in “clientHold” status and now resolves to an inactive webpage.
5. ...
2025-02-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is MUKWEVO DANIEL, Uganda.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...- The Complainant has not authorized, licensed, or permitted the Respondent to use any of its
trademarks or domain name, or to apply for or use any domain name incorporating Complainant’s
trademarks.
- The disputed domain name is inactive. ...
2024-08-20 - Case Details
Respondent is Brian Jump, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Go China Domains, Inc. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainants’
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and
(iii) Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2024-06-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is See PrivacyGuardian.org, United States / Kevin Ebersbach, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Moreover, the Disputed Domain Name carries a risk of implied affiliation.
The Respondent has failed to show that it has acquired any trademark rights in respect of the Disputed Domain Name or that it is commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name.
...
2019-11-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tran Dang Tu, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Mat Bao Corporation (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-11-05 - Case Details
The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s FORMLABS trademark entirely;
- Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Respondent has not been commonly known by the disputed domain name, Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by Complainant and Respondent is not making legitimate use of the disputed domain name;
- Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...
2019-01-23 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s THIELE trademark.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...The only additional element in the disputed domain name is the gTLD “.com”. As a standard requirement of
domain name registration, this element may be disregarded in the comparison between a domain name and
a trademark, unless it has some impact beyond its technical function, which is not the case here. ...
2023-07-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In Exario Network Inc. v. THE DOMAIN NAME YOU HAVE ENTERED IS FOR SALE, eResolution Case No. AF-0536, the panel recognized: “It is well established that a complainant need not own a registered trademark to invoke the policy. ...
2014-07-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant.
/Kathryn Lee/
Kathryn Lee
Sole Panelist
Date: April 29, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Carvana, LLC v. ...
2022-05-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent is not commonly known by the domain name, and has not been licensed or otherwise permitted to use the trademark as a domain name or otherwise. ...
2009-12-15 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the Complainant never authorized the
Respondent to use the disputed domain name, that the Respondent is not generally known by the disputed
domain name, never operated a business under the disputed domain name, has not advertised the disputed
domain name, and never engaged in any bona fide commercial activity in connection with the disputed
domain name. ...Hamilton
Sole Panelist
Date: February 21, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Eli Lilly and Company v. Nancy Toney
Case No. D2024-0115
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-02-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is mandana khaze, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
As stated in many decisions rendered under the Policy (e.g. Robert Ellenbogen v. Mike Pearson,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0001) both conditions, registration and use in bad faith, must be demonstrated; consequently, the Complainant must show that:
- the disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent in bad faith, and
- the disputed domain name is being used by the Respondent in bad faith.
...
2021-09-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on April 2, 2021. The other 63 disputed domain names were registered on May 16, 2021. ...
2021-10-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...The Panel interprets this situation as a passive holding of the disputed domain names.
Such passive holding of a domain name may be interpreted as of bad faith registration and use in the terms of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy. ...
2016-02-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bhanu Yadav, Haemonetics.com, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”)1.
3. ...The Complainant also
contends that the disputed domain name constitutes typosquatting, and that there is no website accessible
from the disputed domain name, both of which indicate bad faith. ...
2023-10-27 - Case Details