The Respondent is Alex Banks, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lowell Clark, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the SODEXO and SODEXO LIVE marks are reproduced within the disputed domain name.
Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the marks for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-09-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Beekman Kabel K.G., Netherlands (Kingdom of the).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Tian Tian Liu, bbookk, Cambodia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The passive holding of the dispute domain name does not amount to use or preparations to use the disputed
domain name in connection with a bone fide offering of goods or services. ...
2024-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira/
Alvaro Loureiro Oliveira
Sole Panelist
Date: May 22, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Laboratoires M&L v. Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico
Case No. D2024-1271
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-05-31 - Case Details
Ltd., a corporation of Japan, with its principal place of business at 4-7, Doshomachi 3-chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8514, Japan.
1.2 The Respondent is Acaramba Inc., an entity having its address at 1 Soldiers Field, # 404, Boston, MA 02163 USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in dispute is "suprax.com", which domain name is registered with Network Solutions Inc. based in Herndon, Virginia, United States of America.
3. ...Pursuant to such decision, the domain names were transferred to the Complainant’s licensee.
5. Parties’ Contentions
The Complainant’s contentions are as follows:
5.1 The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark "SUPRAX" in which the Complainant has rights.
5.2 The domain name was registered or acquired primarily for the purpose of selling, renting or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the Complainant or its licensee for valuable consideration in excess of the domain name registrant’s out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name. ...
2000-09-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Compsys Domain Solutions Private Limited of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-02-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is duvid stern, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s BOSTIK prior trademarks, domain names and company name, the only difference between
the Complainant’s trademark and the disputed domain name being the substitution of the letter “i” with the
letter “l” in the second syllable; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed
domain name; and, the fact that the typo squatting nature of the disputed domain name, combined with the
passive holding of the disputed domain name and the provision of false data when registering the disputed
domain name, show the Respondent’s bad faith in registering and using the disputed domain name.
...
2024-10-21 - Case Details
Respondent is Josh Shampo, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to historical WHOIS data, the disputed domain name was originally registered on June 4, 2004 by
Complainant. Complainant owned the disputed domain name for nineteen years. ...
2024-07-01 - Case Details
The Complainant alleges that the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
The Complainant accordingly petitions the Panel to order transfer of the disputed domain name.
...The trade mark is the only distinctive part of the disputed domain name and the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark.
...
2016-11-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected / WhoisGuard Inc. of Panama, Onur Oztas of Adana, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant's trademark in its entirety. As recognized in past decisions such as ELS Educational Services, Inc. v. ...
2017-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Faheem Lashari, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Dynadot Inc (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-09-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Aykut Yilmaz, AY-SAT Otomotiv Nakliyat Gida ith. ihr. Ltd. Sti., Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...None of this is consistent with the Respondent having rights or legitimate interests as a genuine re-seller using the disputed domain name in terms of the “Okidata factors” set out in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc.
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-08-31 - Case Details
Respondent is Djuradj Caranovic, Serbia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...Respondent, according to the disclosed WhoIs information for the disputed domain name, is a resident of the Republic of Serbia who registered the disputed domain name on April 5, 2021. ...
2021-10-05 - Case Details
Patent and Trademark Office). Neither can the inclusion of the top level domain designator ".com" in the domain name serve to distinguish that name from Complainant’s mark in any way. ...Respondent argues, in essence, that registration of a domain name is sufficient to establish rights or a legitimate interest in the domain name. The Presiding Panelist finds that registration of a domain name is not, by itself, sufficient to establish rights or a legitimate interest in the domain name. ...
2000-04-05 - Case Details
The respondent is Cimagotipo S.L., a Spanish company based at Pallars 161, 08005 - Barcelona, Spain ("the Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is ("the Domain Name").
The registrar of the Domain Name is Tucows.com, Inc. ...In Complainant's view the situation is similar to that in Telstra Ltd. v.
Nuclear Marshmallows Inc. (WIPO Case D2000-0003),
where the panel considered that passive holding of a domain name satisfies the
requirement of paragraph 4(a)(iii) that the domain name is being used in bad
faith by Respondent.
...
2001-08-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Laurent Guerson, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a
Registrar.eu. ...As to the use of the disputed domain name in bad faith, as previously mentioned, at the time of filing of the
Complaint, the disputed domain name resolved to a parking page. ...
2022-05-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wis INC, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights, nor legitimate interests in the domain name . Accordingly, the Respondent has no rights on SODEXO as corporate name, trade name, shop sign, mark or domain name that would be prior to the Complainant’s rights.
...
2019-10-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Venom Focuz, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s G4S
mark as the G4S mark is fully incorporated and recognizable within the disputed domain name.
...
2022-08-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is James Adams, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name as revealed by the WhoIs details for
the disputed domain name, and is not authorised by the Complainant.
...
2024-10-16 - Case Details