[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]
[process2-comments] RFC-1
To: | process.mail@wipo.int | |
Subject: | [process2-comments] RFC-1 | |
From: | Susan Isiko <isikos@hotmail.com> | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:30:57 +0200 |
Name: Susan Isiko Position: Advocate B. List of issues i. Yes ii. All. If Government officials are protected in their official capacity, then it should be under the Government and not personal name. iii. Bad faith - registration done for wrong intentions, - registration of same name well knowing it already exists and being aware that it will be misleading of another person's trade etc. abusive - name not used for purposes for which is was registered, or used for illegal transactions misleading - name resembles so much an existing one that it harms the one who was registered first iv Should advise parties to get to a compromise so one changes or modifies the name; otherwise, should be subjected to dispute settlement v The one already existing under WIPO Domain Names ( mediation, mediation followed by arbitration or arbitration) vi I believe directory or listing, if directories or lists are open to public, should be sufficient. I am convinced that if one is in position to register a personal name, they should equally be able to afford the little costs, if any, of accessing the lists or directories, before they register. C. List of issues i. Yes ii. As in B iii. As in B (v), but with WHO giving amicus curiae brief as to whether the INNs qualify. iv. N/A v. N/A vi. Directory, listing D. List os issues i. Yes ii. As in B iii. As in B iv. N/A v. N/A vi. As in B vii. All E. List of issues i. Yes ii. As in B iii. All iv. As in B v. No comment vi. No comment vii. As in B F. List of issues No comment No comment on Procedures and Timetable |
- Prev by Date: [process2-comments] Deuxieme processus de consultations de l'OMPI sur les noms de domaine de l'Internet
- Next by Date: [process2-comments] RFC-1
- Index(es):