The Complainant has also registered the Trade Mark with the Trademark Clearinghouse ("TMCH").
The Trade Mark is a well-known trade mark in relation to beer and related products.
B. Respondent
The Respondent appears to be an individual located in China.
...The Panel concludes bad faith is further made out by virtue of the fact the disputed domain name is identical to the Trade Mark, and by virtue of the fact the Respondent received notification of the Complainant's rights in the Trade Mark from the TMCH before the Respondent obtained registration of the disputed domain name. There can be no question the Respondent was aware of the Complainant's rights in its well-known Trade Mark prior to registration of the disputed domain name.
...
2017-04-19 - Case Details
SBD received notification from the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) that the Respondent registered the disputed domain names and . ...Moreover, the Respondent apparently ignored the TMCH warning it received prior to having registered the disputed domain names. This, in itself, reflects bad faith registration.
...
2015-01-08 - Case Details
- In any event, Respondent received notice of Complainant’s rights in the WESTIN, ST. REGIS and W HOTELS trademarks from the TMCH when it registered the disputed domain names.
- The fact that Respondent registered the identical and/or confusingly similar disputed domain names without authorization is, in and of itself, evidence of bad faith...REGIS and W HOTELS trademarks from the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”) when she registered the disputed domain names. As such, Respondent would have had actual notice of Complainant’s trademark rights at the time of the registration of the disputed domain names in 2014. ...
2014-08-29 - Case Details
The Complainant informs the Panel that, in order to protect its trademark SHERATON from cybersquatting, the Complainant submitted its Community trademark No. 154450 to the Trademark Clearinghouse ("TMCH") and highlights that, therefore, when the Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain name, it has received "a warning notice" from the concerned registrar and, despite having received said notice, proceeded with the registration of the disputed domain name, being fully aware that its registration conflicted with the Complainant's trademark.
...The Complainant also highlights that the Respondent received notice of the Complainant's rights via the TMCH when it registered the disputed domain name.
The Complainant also highlights that the fact that the disputed domain name is not currently associated with an active web site does not exclude bad faith registration and use.
...
2015-05-04 - Case Details
La mala fe en el registro la observa en el hecho de que no puede deberse a la casualidad la elección del término que conforma el nombre de dominio en disputa y además el Demandado conocía que estaba obstaculizando el derecho de un tercero porque la marca LABORAL KUTXA está registrada en la TradeMark ClearingHouse (TMCH) y el Demandado recibió de ésta un aviso en el momento del registro del nombre de dominio en disputa advirtiéndole que éste coincidía con la marca de un tercero. ...La Demandante considera que existe mala fe en el registro del nombre de dominio en disputa porque no puede deberse a la casualidad la elección del término “laboralkutxa”, identificador absoluto de la Demandante y, porque, además, el Demandado en el momento del registro del nombre de dominio en disputa recibió un aviso de la TMCH, donde la Demandante tiene registrada su marca, advirtiéndole que el nombre de dominio en disputa coincidía con la marca de un tercero y obstaculizaba su derecho. ...
2020-07-20 - Case Details
The Complainant informs the Panel that, in order to protect its trademark SHERATON from cybersquatting, the Complainant submitted its Community trademark No. 154450 to the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and highlights that, therefore, when the Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain name, it has received “a warning notice” from the concerned registrar and, despite having received said notice, proceeded with the registration of the disputed domain name, being fully aware that its registration conflicted with the Complainant’s trademark.
...The Complainant also highlights that the Respondent received notice of the Complainant’s rights via the TMCH when it registered the disputed domain name.
As to the use of the disputed domain name, the Complainant submits that the web site currently appearing at the Internet address associated with the disputed domain name merely displays a parking page provided by the concerned Registrar, which indicates that Respondent has not directed the DNS servers to any web site since the registration and solicits offers from visitors to the page to purchase the disputed domain name through the Registrar’s domain broker service.
...
2014-08-11 - Case Details
Moreover, the Complainant’s NETBET trade mark was registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”). The extension “.vip” had a claims notification period from May 17, 2016 to August 15, 2016. This means that the Respondent would have known of the Complainant’s rights in and to the NETBET trade mark before registering the disputed domain name.
...The Panel is fully persuaded that the Respondent had knowledge of the Complainant and its NETBET trade mark when registering the disputed domain name, in particular because the NETBET mark had been registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”). Further, taking into account the Respondent’s apparent propensity to register domain names corresponding to third-party trade marks (which has not been rebutted by the Respondent), the Panel is of the view that the current passive holding of the disputed domain name under the circumstances does not prevent the Panel’s finding that the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2016-12-27 - Case Details
投诉人取得了多个ALSTOM的注册商标专用权，例如：国际注册商标706360及706292（二者皆注册于1998年8月28日）。
投诉人2014年4月25日与TradeMark Clearinghouse(“TMCH”)注册该商标ALSTOM。
4.2 被投诉人
被投诉人几乎是一位于中国的个人。
4.3 争议域名
争议域名注册于2015年9月16日。
4.4 争议域名网站
争议域名并未指向任何有效网站，由被投诉人被动持有(passive holding)。
...专家组亦认为投诉人的ALSTOM名称使用在铁路运输商品及服务上具有极高的显著性。另外，投诉人已将ALSTOM商标在TMCH处注册，所以被投诉人在注册争议域名之时应当知晓投诉人的商标专用权。鉴于上述理由，专家组认定被投诉人注册争议域名时，知道或应当知道ALSTOM为投诉人所有的商标。
虽然被投诉人被动持有争议域名，争议域名未指向任何有效网站，但是鉴于投诉人的ALSTOM商标的知名度及本案其他情况，专家组认为被投诉人被动持有争议域名的情形在本案中亦构成对争议域名的恶意使用（见WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition (“WIPO Overview 2.0”), 第3.2段）。
...
2016-03-02 - Case Details
The trademark LA BANQUE POSTALE is also registered in the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”) since July 24, 2013.
The Domain Name was registered on March 15, 2017. The Domain Name does not resolve to an active website.
5. ...
2017-09-15 - Case Details
Fabrizio Bedarida
Sole Panelist
Date: October 22, 2015
1 The Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) is a rights protection mechanism built into ICANN's new gTLD program. It is a centralized database of verified trademarks that is connected to each and every new Top Level Domain (TLD) that will launch. ...
2015-11-04 - Case Details
The right in proof of use of the VIRGIN trademark have been acknowledged by validated entries made at Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”). The Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations for VIRGIN, inter alia, United Kingdom trademark registration No. 1009534, registered on April 11, 1973.
5. ...
2018-12-14 - Case Details
Complainant has provided a list of registrations for the VIRGIN trademark in a substantial number of countries, including Nigeria, and has referred to a “validated entry made at the TMCH” for the VIRGIN trademark. Complainant has submitted a Witness Statement from an employee (i.e.,Trademark Assistant) of an affiliate of Complainant to “establish my Company’s reputation in its VIRGIN and Virgin Signature trademarks throughout the world”.
...
2018-05-24 - Case Details
The Complainant has registered the TOPSOLID trademark with TMCH on September 30, 2013.
The Complainant also owns and communicates on the Internet through several domain names, of
which the domain name was registered on January 18, 1999.
...
2016-12-05 - Case Details
The Trade Mark has also been registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”) since July 15, 2013.
B. Respondent
The Respondent is a company incorporated in China.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on April 28, 2017.
...
2017-08-10 - Case Details
REMY COINTREAU is also registered in the Trade Mark Clearing House (TMCH) since January 28, 2015.
The Complainant owns and communicates on the Internet through various websites worldwide. ...
2015-10-07 - Case Details
The Complainant’s trademarks are
recorded at the Trademark Clearinghouse (“TMCH”), so the Respondent received a notice at the time of
registration of the disputed domain name advising him that the disputed domain name coincided with the
CAJA LABORAL mark. ...
2023-04-17 - Case Details
争议域名与投诉人在ICANN的全球商标信息交换库(Trademark Clearinghouse, “TMCH”)中注册的商标ALSTOM相同。ALSTOM是国际驰名商标。被投诉人注册与之相同的争议域名，是为了通过该商标商誉，获得不当利益。
鉴于投诉人商标的声誉，及除指代投诉人商标外，ALSTOM在字典里没有其他含义的事实，及在争议域名中使用投诉人商标的事实，可以推知被投诉人应该是因为投诉人商标的价值才注册该争议域名的。另外，当被投诉人注册争议域名时，应该收到TMCH发送的通知，告知其ALSTOM是已注册的商标。
此外，自注册之日起，争议域名指向的网站一直处于被动持有状态。先前的UDRP专家组通常认为，争议域名含有著名商标，且争议域名指向的网站处于被动持有状态的，将构成恶意注册及使用的证据。
...
2015-02-13 - Case Details
The MOBIC mark also has been registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) since April 16, 2014.
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on May 27, 2016, according to relevant WhoIs records maintained by the Registrar. ...
2016-08-25 - Case Details
The MOBIC mark also has been registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) since April 16, 2014.
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on May 27, 2016, according to relevant WhoIs records maintained by the Registrar. ...
2016-08-25 - Case Details
La "Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers" (ICANN) a en outre mis en place des nouveaux gTLDs et a mis en place une pièce maîtresse du dispositif des nouveaux noms de domaine qui est le TMCH (Trademark Clearinghouse) qui est le nouveau mode de protection des marques sur internet. D’autres unités d’enregistrement ont par ailleurs mis en place des mécanismes de protection des droits (RPM) tels que la procédure “sunrise” pour la phase de pré-lancement par laquelle les titulaires de droits de marque peuvent enregistrer ou contester sous certaines conditions l’enregistrement de noms de domaine. ...
2014-09-22 - Case Details