The Parties
The Complainant is Volkswagen AG of Wolfsburg, Germany, represented by Gołębiowska Krawczyk Roszkowski i Partnerzy Kancelaria Adwokacko-Radcowska Sp. p., Poland.
The Respondent is Identity Protection Service, Identity Protect Limited of Hayes, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”) / Andreas Born-Seiferle of Laufenburg, Germany.
2. ...
2018-07-04 - Case Details
PrivacyYes.com, Igor Spodin,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1568, ; Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847, ; Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter Plc v. ...
2018-11-15 - Case Details
D2017-1268; SAP SE v. Lakshmi Reddy Bhumireddy and P. Hareesh,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0396; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Cameron Jackson,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-11-08 - Case Details
D2018-0387; and SAP SE v. Lakshmi Reddy Bhumireddy and P. Hareesh,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0396.
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark SKY HIGH. ...
2018-08-21 - Case Details
- Complainant has one of the top five mobile bank apps in the 2017 S&P Global Market Intelligence Mobile Bank App ranking.
Complainant maintains its primary website at the domain name . ...
2019-03-21 - Case Details
D2016-0394, “[a]lthough the letter ‘a’ between the letters ‘h’ and ‘t’ have been omitted and it is the same with the letter ‘s’ after the letter ‘t’ as well as the second ‘p’ at the end of that word, the trademark WHATSAPP can still be easily recognized since the misspelled trademark remains the dominant or principal component of the domain name”. ...
2019-03-15 - Case Details
See The Citation of Wikipedia in Judicial Opinions by Lee F. Peoples, 12 Yale J.L. and Tech. 1 (2009), p. 3.; for its part, “pedia” means ‘learning’ in Latin. See “www.quora.com/What-does-the-word-pedia-mean“...
2019-03-08 - Case Details
To put this in the terms of the Respondent’s own language, the Panel quotes from the Respondent’s website: “We stand for the right to keep what we legally acquired and [p]lease make sure you understand.” In agreement with both those principles, the Panel finds that the Respondent is not entitled to keep this because the Domain Name was not in fact legally acquired.
...
2021-01-28 - Case Details
VistaPrint Technologies Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0886; and Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and “Madonna.com”,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847).
It is acknowledged that once the Panel finds a prima facie case is made by a complainant, the burden of production under the second element shifts to the respondent to come forward with relevant evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2021-02-18 - Case Details
With respect to those of the Disputed Domain Names listed in categories 3, 4, and 5 above: The Panel considers section 1.15 of WIPO Overview 3.0, which states that, “[i]n some instances, panels have… taken note of the content of the website associated with a domain name to confirm confusing similarity whereby it appears prima facie that the respondent seeks to target a trademark through the disputed domain name.” See also section 1.7 of WIPO Overview 3.0: “[P]anels have also found that the overall facts and circumstances of a case (including relevant website content) may support a finding of confusing similarity, particularly where it appears that the respondent registered the domain name precisely because it believed that the domain name was confusingly similar to a mark held by the complainant.”
...
2020-05-19 - Case Details
The addition of dictionary terms or the “.net” gTLD extension do not prevent a finding of confusing similarity. See, Hoffmann-LaRoche AG v. P Martin,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0323; Dixons Group Plc. v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0843; V&S Vin & Sprit AB v. ...
2019-04-23 - Case Details
John Adem,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1480; Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v. Michael Urvan,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0596; The E.W. Scripps Company v. Sinologic Industries,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-04-26 - Case Details
Até mesmo porque, segundo o art. 1o da Resolução CGI.br/RES/2008/008/P do Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, via de regra, um nome de domínio disponível para registro é concedido ao primeiro requerente que satisfaz, quando do requerimento, as exigências para o registro do mesmo.
...
2020-01-16 - Case Details
My colleagues appear to endorse these standards, see Panel opinion, p. 5, 1 but excuse the Complainant or its representative because the"Complainant based in India, given this resemblance and not being familiar at the time of filing the Complaint whether there was any connection between the Respondent and India, decided to file the Complaint." ...
2019-12-16 - Case Details
Proactiva, WIPO Case No. D2012-0182;
Mercado Libre Inc v. P Mercado Pago, Pedro Yukio Sato, WIPO Case No. D2022-0624; WIPO Overview
3.0, section 1.11.
The Panel therefore finds the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Mark for
the purposes of satisfying paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...
2025-11-25 - Case Details
He since identified himself in his Response as Louis Rosenfeld d.b.a. netEGG Internet of Washington DC, U.S.A. He is represented by Mr. B. P. Miller of Wilkinson, Barker, Knauer LLP of Washington DC, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . ...
2001-08-15 - Case Details
See: Digital City, Inc. v. Smalldomain (D2000-1283), at p.6....
2001-05-17 - Case Details
However, use which intentionally trades
on the fame of another cannot constitute a bona fide offering of goods
or services: Madonna Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna v. Dan Parisi and "Madonna.com",
WIPO Case No. D2000-0847. Although the
Complainant’s mark cannot not be regarded as famous, it is clear from the content
of the Respondent’s website during the 2002 festival that, despite his assertion
to the contrary, the Respondent intended to attract to his site Internauts expecting
to find a site associated with the Complainant. ...
2003-04-10 - Case Details
Quantum Computer
Services, Inc., OMPI D2000-0847, Madonna
Ciccone, p/k/a Madonna vs. Dan Parisini, OMPI
D2000-0867, Isabelle Adjani vs. Second Orbit Communications, Incs.).
...
2003-02-04 - Case Details
On this webpage, it is alleged that the domain name was "introduced" as "K-Yobo.com", "Yobo" being a common Korean name for one spouse to call another (Complaint, p 10). After the transfer to the present Respondent, it appears that the domain name was linked to a website for a Japanese movie with the title of "Sono otoko, kyob ni tsuki" meaning "The Man, to Ferocity" in English ((Complaint, Annex 13). ...
2003-04-01 - Case Details