Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on June 20, 2011.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as sole panelist in this matter on June 20, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Names, and be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: June 30, 2011...
2011-07-14 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on August 28, 2007.
The Center appointed Thomas P. Pinansky as the sole panelist in this matter on September 14, 2007. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
Thomas P. Pinansky
Sole Panelist
Dated: September 28, 2007...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the parties that an administrative panel was going to be appointed on June 20, 2011.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on June 27, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Panel orders in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 4, 2011...
2011-07-18 - Case Details
Die Gesuchstellerin ist Inhaberin mehrerer Schweizer Marken. Als Hauptmarke fungiert heute die Wortmarke Nr. P-485104 HOMEGATE, welche am 23. März 2001 beim Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum hinterlegt und anschliessend auch eingetragen wurde mit Schutz in den Waren und Dienstleistungsklassen 9, 14, 28, 35, 36, 41, 42. ...Bestand von Kennzeichenrechten
Wie oben erwähnt, ist die Gesuchstellerin die Besitzerin der Schweizer Wortmarke Nr. P-485104 HOMEGATE, die am 23. März 2001 hinterlegt worden ist. In ihrer Beilage 10 hat die Gesuchstellerin eine Kopie des vom Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum ausgestellten Markenzertifikates beigefügt. ...
2011-12-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
G&P Net S.p.A. v. Shawshank Trade
Case No. D2012-0153
1. The Parties
The Complainant is G&P Net S.p.A. of Altopascio, Lucca, Italy, represented by Società Italiana Brevetti, Italy.
...
2012-03-22 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
DECISÃO DO PAINEL ADMINISTRATIVO
DOCTISSIMO v. P. A. M.
Caso No. DBR2014-0016
1. As Partes
A Reclamante é DOCTISSIMO, de Levallois Perret, França, representada por Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema Moreira, Brasil.
O Reclamado é P. A. M., de São Paulo, Brasil.
2. O Nome de Domínio e a Unidade de Registro
O nome de domínio em disputa é , o qual está registrado perante o NIC.br.
3. ...
2015-02-11 - Case Details
Juli 2006 beim Eidgenössischen Institut für Geistiges Eigentum als Erweiterung der älteren Marke COMPARIS Nr. P-472823 (registriert am 25. November1999, Schutzverlängerung bis 25. November 2019) hinterlegt und anschliessend auch eingetragen wurde.
...Sie macht geltend, dass der Gesuchsgegner den Domain-Namen absichtlich so gewählt habe, um Internet-User aufgrund eines einfachen Tippfehlers (die Buchstaben “o” und “p” liegen auf der Tastatur direkt nebeneinander) auf dessen Website zu leiten und so vom guten Ruf und dem Erfolg der Gesuchstellerin zu profitieren.
...
2014-03-19 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on July 19, 2010.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on July 26, 2010. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Name, be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 29, 2010...
2010-08-09 - Case Details
BnB, the Respondent in that case, was allegedly an
agent of Respondent Dissertationdoctors.com and Dissertation-doctors.com. Complaint,
p. 7.
Complainant alleges that Respondent had not made any use of the domain names at issue before March 27, 2001, the date Complainant’s service mark registration issued. ...However, Complainant alleges that Respondent has used the domain names at issue to "offer[] to write book reports, essays, research papers, dissertations and term papers for others who are willing to pay a set fee and who then turn the work in as their own." Complaint, p. 6.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant contends that Respondent has registered domain names that are identical or confusingly similar to the service mark registered and used by Complainant, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain names at issue, and that Respondent has registered and is using the domain names at issue in bad faith.
...
2003-07-10 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lundbergs Produkter i Nyköping AB v. P D S
Case No. D2003-0730
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Lundbergs Produkter i Nyköping AB,of Sweden, represented by Mr. Jan Sjöbeck, Groth & Co. KB, of Sweden.
The Respondent is P D S, of Stockholm, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, Inc.
3. ...
2003-11-24 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Mesirow Financial, Inc. v. Tatjana P. Kolpakova
Case No. D2013-1448
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Mesirow Financial, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois, United States of America (“US”), represented by Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, US.
The Respondent is Tatjana P. Kolpakova of Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER (the “Registrar”).
3. ...
2013-11-21 - Case Details
The Panel is therefore satisfied that Complainant has provided sufficient prima facie evidence that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name.
Complainant also contends “[P]arked pages comprising PPC links [do] not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill of the complainant’s mark”.
...Prior UDRP panels have consistently held that respondents that monetize domain names using PPC links targeting the complainant, have not made a bona fide offering of goods or services that would give rise to rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name and, therefore, Respondent is not using the Disputed Domain Name to provide a bona fide offering of goods or services as allowed under Policy. paragraph 4(c)(i), nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use as allowed under Policy, paragraph 4(c)(iii).
Section 2.9 of WIPO Overview 3.0 provides:
“[P]anels have found that the use of a domain name to host a parked page comprising PPC links does not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or capitalize on the reputation and goodwill of the complainant’s mark or otherwise mislead Internet users.” ...
2020-05-13 - Case Details
Francis Raynald Grenier
and Cadmos LLC, WIPO Case No. D2002-0049,
at p. 5; Monty and Pat Roberts, Inc. v. Bill Keith, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0299, at p. 9; Migros Genossenschaftsbund v. Centro Consulenze
Kim Paloschi, WIPO Case No. D2000-1171,
at p. 5; Women on Waves Foundation v. Chris Hoffman, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1608, at p. 4. If the true motive is to operate a web site
providing information about the Complainant or a discussion forum on the Complainant’s
activities, the Respondents could easily have, and should have, chosen a domain
name which would clearly indicate to users that this was not the Complainant’s
official web site but an unofficial web site containing information about the
Complainant and/or a discussion forum...
2002-08-23 - Case Details
The
Parties
The Complainant is Dell
Computer Corporation of One Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682, United States of
America.
The Respondents are MTO
C.A. of Mariedy #2, P. Fijo, Falcon Estade Falcon, Venezuela and Diabetes
Education Long LifeÔ - DellÔ,
a division of Master Tec Occidente C.A. ...Mark
Class(es)
Application/
Registration Dates
USA
2,030,084
DELL
DIMENSION
9
Filed:
January 11, 1996
Registered: January 14, 1997
USA
2,284,782
DELL
PRECISION
9
Filed:
March 5, 1998
Registered October 12, 1999
USA
2,333,902
DELL
FINANCIAL SERVICES
42
Filed:
August 13, 1997
Registered: March 21, 2000
4.2.3 The DELL mark and variations of it are
also registered by the Complainant in more than 130 countries around the world.
4.2.4 In the Respondent's country, Venezuela,
the Complainant sells products and owns a number of trademark registrations for
DELL for use in relation to computer products and services. These include:
Registration Number Mark
P-208279 DELL
P-208280 DELL
P-208281 DELL
P-208284 DELL
P-175192 DELL (stylised)
P-217855 WWW.DELL.COM
S-13926 WWW.DELL.COM
N-41282 WWW.DELL.COM
4.2.5 The Complainant extensively advertises and
promotes its trademarks, products, services and image. ...
2002-07-17 - Case Details
Sachverhalt
Die Gesuchstellerin betreibt unter der Marke „Otto“ den bekannten Versandhandel für diverse Güter des täglichen Gebrauchs, wie Kleidung, technische Geräte, Möbel etc.
Die schweizerische Marke Nr. P-423132 „Otto“ wurde am 25. März 1996, eingetragen.
Die Gesuchstellerin unterhält für den Versandhandel die Domainnamen „otto.de“, auf welche der Nutzer auch über „otto-versand.de“ sowie „ottoversand.de“ gelangt.
...Die Gesuchstellerin hat ein Recht am geltend gemachten Kennzeichen nach schweizerischem Recht
Wie bereits oben ausgeführt, ist die Gesuchstellerin in der Schweiz Inhaberin der Marke „Otto“, registriert am 25. März 1996 (Marken-Nr. P-423132).
Entsprechend hat die Gesuchstellerin den Nachweis gemäss Paragraph 24(d)(i) des Verfahrensreglements ausreichend erbracht.
...
2006-01-16 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on December 28, 2007.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on January 14, 2008. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Accordingly, the Panel orders in accordance with
paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules that the disputed domain name
be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: January 29, 2008...
2008-02-15 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on June 17, 2006.
The Center appointed Gustavo P. Giay as the sole panelist
in this matter on June 28, 2006. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted.
...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Gustavo P. Giay
Sole Panelist
Dated: July 12, 2006...
2006-08-10 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondents’ default on February 3, 2011.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on February 14, 2011. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: February 22, 2011...
2011-03-08 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center on November 6, 2008.
The Center appointed Thomas P. Pinansky as the sole panelist in this matter on November 13, 2008. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Thomas P. Pinansky
Sole Panelist
Dated: November 26, 2008...
2008-12-09 - Case Details
The Complainant submitted an unsolicited Supplemental Filing on July 10, 2008.
The Center appointed William P. Knight as the sole panelist in this matter on July 30, 2008. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reason, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, , be transferred to the Complainant.
William P. Knight
Sole Panelist
Dated: August 4, 2008...
2008-08-18 - Case Details