Response, p.4.
In April 1999, respondent "registered a business plan for reinfolink with Venture Capitalists, Garage.com ... an attempt to solicit funding." ...Respondent further asserts that he has not used the Domain Name to solicit or confuse Complainant’s customers nor attempted to benefit or profit from Complainant’s name. Response, p.12.
Respondent also denies that he registered the Domain Name for the purpose of selling it. Response p.6. ...
2001-04-12 - Case Details
The Complainant owns the following United States trademark registrations:
CAPZASIN-P, U.S. Registration No. 2226385, applied for February 7, 1994, and registered February 23, 1999;
CAPZASIN-HP, U.S. ...The Complainant maintains that its CAPZASIN, CAPZASIN-P and CAPZASIN-HP marks do not have any particular meaning and are highly distinctive, and explains that the letters “p” and “hp” in the marks stand for “pain” and “high potency” respectively. ...
2020-06-25 - Case Details
La Partie adverse est Triall SA de Genève, Suisse, représentée par l’Etude de Me P. Azzola, Suisse.
2. Le nom de domaine
Le différend concerne le nom de domaine (le “Nom de Domaine”).
...Proper” parmi lesquelles figurent les marques suivantes (conjointement “la Marque”):
- P-351766 MR. PROPER, en classes 3 et 21, déposée le 18 décembre 1986;
- P-458622 MR. PROPER, en classes 5, 16 et 21, déposée le 19 août 1998;
- P-514281 MR PROPER, en classes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 14, 16-18, 20-22, 24-25, 27-28, 35, 37 et 40-41, déposée le 5 février 2003.
...
2014-03-25 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
DECISÃO DO PAINEL ADMINISTRATIVO
AB Electrolux v. P. H. P.
Caso No. DBR2023-0007
1. As Partes
A Reclamante é AB Electrolux, Suécia, representada por SILKA AB, Suécia.
...DECISÃO DO PAINEL ADMINISTRATIVO
AB Electrolux v. P. H. P.
Caso No. DBR2023-0007...
2023-06-05 - Case Details
WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Alex Boolop / Davy Kiba-Gaste, Camelot / Z-P. M, Z-P. M
Case No. D2016-1981
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Ritzio Purchase Limited of Nicosia, Cyprus, represented by Mapa Trademarks SL, Spain.
The Respondents are WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. of Panama, Panama / Alex Boolop of Kiev, Ukraine / Davy Kiba-Gaste, Camelot of Victoria, Seychelles / Z-P. M, Z-P. M of Vernon, France. The Respondents Davy Kiba-Gaste, Camelot and Z-P. M, Z-P. M are represented by Boston Law Group, PC, United States of America.
2. ...
2016-12-27 - Case Details
Within the same time period, the poker section of the Complainant’s website received 1.9 million hits and over six million page views. Complaint, p. 5.
The Panel has before it scant evidence of the Co-Respondents’ relationship to the disputed domain name. ...It argues that the domain name simply combines its distinctive BORGATA mark with the generic word “poker.” Complaint, p. 6. In the Complainant’s view, the word “poker” is already “indisputably associated with the Complainant’s casino and gaming services.” ...
2013-07-16 - Case Details
Respondent notes that “drive-up” is in the dictionary and that “drive-ups ‘were nostalgic places of yesteryear.’” (Response, p. 5.) Respondent asserts that Complainant has never used “driveups” as a trademark and further that because “driveups” is a generic term, it cannot gain trademark rights. ...Respondent posits he “purchases domains at various auctions and subsequently attempts to find secondary buyers for these newly acquired domains.” (Response, p. 8.) Respondent disagrees with the proposition that offering domain names for sale is against the Policy.
...
2013-11-06 - Case Details
Complainant
The following are the Complainant’s contentions:
- the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s PRINCIPAL Mark;
1 The Complainant also owns various formations of the stylized “P” trademark, for example: P, United States Registration No.5,083,508,
registered on November 15, 2016, in International Class 36. ...Moreover, the presence of the Complainant’s stylized “P” Mark as a
favicon makes it clear that the Respondent specifically targeted the Complainant. The Respondent’s bad
faith is further supported by the publication of a bogus business registration certificate on its website. ...
2023-03-16 - Case Details
Complaint, p.9). Because both companies do business on the Internet – Respondent through its domain name registration site that can be accessed by linking from the site –the domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s PROM mark.
...Complainant accuses Respondent of "thumb[ing] its nose at the Dispute Resolution Procedure." (Complaint, p. 14). To the contrary, if there is any finger pointing to be done, it points the other way. The Panel is reminded of the old adage, "Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones." ...
2002-03-27 - Case Details
- Marque combinée CASH CONVERTERS (n° P-425751) enregistrée avec une date de priorité remontant au 7 mars 1995 en classes 36 et 42 de la Classification de Nice.
...a) Antériorité des marques
En l’espèce, les marques suisses de la Requérante ont été enregistrées avec une date de priorité remontant au 12 septembre 1997 s’agissant de la marque verbale (n° P-468849), et au 7 mars 1995 s’agissant de la marque combinée (n° P-425751). Le nom de domaine litigieux ayant été enregistré le 15 février 2012, l’antériorité des marques précitées est démontrée.
...
2012-09-28 - Case Details
In the penultimate paragraph of the Response the Respondent states that “I request not to transfer the specified domain names to Campagnolo Srl. at costs to E-R-P, but de-block the specified domain names in a way that E-R-P can terminate them itself with the registrar.”
...The Respondent concludes that “I request not to transfer the specified domain names to Campagnolo Srl. at costs of E-R-P, but de-block the specified names in a way E-R-P can terminate them itself immediately with the registrar”.
6. ...
2013-06-07 - Case Details
2012 305, p. 313; Rolf H. Weber, E-Commerce und Recht, Rechtliche
Rahmenbedingungen elektronischer Geschäftsformen, 2nd ed, Zurich 2010, p. 137; Thouvenin/Dorigo, in:
Noth/Bühler/Thouvenin [eds.], SHK Markenschutzgesetz, Bern 2009, Art. 13 N 50).
...A contrary position is taken by Alberini/Guillet (loc. cit., p. 313-314
para. 4), who also affirm a likelihood of confusion in the case of inactive domain names on the basis of the
mere wording of a domain name. ...
2024-12-24 - Case Details
Complaint ¶5; Response, p. 12). A recent (November 21) visit to the site reveals an opportunity to vote in a poll "Who will be President," advertising, links to other sections that cannot be accessed, and an "under construction" notice. ...Respondent also accuses Complainant of intimidation in the January 4, 2000 telephone conversation (Reply, p. 12) and asks for a finding of reverse domain name hijacking (Reply, p. 14). Based on the Panel's findings below, this request is denied.
3. ...
2000-12-14 - Case Details
En outre, les noms de domaine doivent répondre aux exigences de la loyauté selon le droit de la concurrence (ATF 128 III 353 consid. 3 p. 357/358; 126 III 239 consid. 2b et 2c p. 244/245).
La jurisprudence enseigne toutefois qu’en cas de collision entre divers droits, il convient de peser les intérêts en présence, afin de parvenir à la solution la plus équitable possible (ATF 128 III 353 consid. 3 p. 358; 126 III 239 consid. 2c p. 245; 125 III 91 consid. 3c p. 93 et les arrêts cités). ...En effet, en cas de conflit entre le droit découlant d’une marque et celui issu d’une raison de commerce, le législateur n’a pas introduit de règle de prééminence lorsque des lois protégeant des signes de nature différente se chevauchent, car tous ces droits sont de même valeur (ATF 125 III 91, consid. 3c p. 93).
La jurisprudence prévoit qu’il faut en premier lieu déterminer si le demandeur peut se prévaloir d’une atteinte à son droit exclusif (p.ex. droit au nom) ou d’un comportement déloyal de la part du défendeur. ...
2012-07-16 - Case Details
The Complainant owns trademarks as follows:
- European Union Trade Mark No. 005786348, P PERSTORP, filing date March 8, 2007, International classes 2, 4, 17, 30, 31;
- French trademark No. 95601566, P PERSTORP, filing date December 18, 1995, International classes 1, 17;
- United Kingdom trademark No. 00000866317, P PERSTORP, filing date June 30, 1964, International class 17;
- Spanish trademark No. 2000208, P PERSTORP, filing date December 5, 1995, International class 17;
- United States of America trademark No. 2181123, P PERSTORP, filing date May 23, 1996, International class 1.
...The disputed domain name includes dominant part of the Complainant's trademark P PERSTORP, adding meaningless "s" letter and the gTLD ".com", which does not preclude similarity of the disputed domain name and the Complainant's trademark.
...
2018-06-08 - Case Details
The wordmark BUCHERER (CH 2P-326249) registered in Switzerland for goods in class 14.
2. The wordmark BUCHERER (CH P-418777) registered in Switzerland for services in classes 37 and 42.
3. The figurative mark Bucherer Diamond (CH P-450044) registered in Switzerland for goods in class 14.
4. The figurative mark Bucherer Mogok Collection (CH P-461095) registered in Switzerland in class 14.
5. Bucherer plus the word loyalty/club figurative mark (CH P-469392) registered in class 14.
...
2013-09-13 - Case Details
However, there is no entity in charge of constructing the web site secotools.com by the name of P D S. The Respondent is a known Swedish "cyber squatter", known under the trade name P D S/PDS AB. It has registered a great number of domain names containing widely known trademarks in Sweden and the Nordic countries. ...A list provided by the VeriSign Whois contains a substantial number of domain names for P D S reflecting trade marks or trade names, known to wide segments of the public, to which the Respondent cannot claim any rights. ...
2002-03-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
GA Modefine S.A. v. Sparco P/L
Case No. D 2000-0419
1. The Parties
The Complainant is GA Modefine SA, a Swiss Corporation having registered offices in Avenue de France 90, 1004 Lausanne, represented by Ms. ...On May 24, 2000, Network Solution replied that: (1) Network Solutions was not in receipt of the Complaint sent to them by the Complainant; (2) Network Solutions was the Registrar of the domain name registration; (3) Sparco P/L was the current registrant of the ARMANIEXCHANGE.NET domain name registration. (4) Registrant: Sparco P/L (ARMANIEXCHANGE3-DOM.NET). 20 Nuwarra Rd., Holsworthy, Sidney, NS 21700, Australia, Administrative Contact, Billling Contact Lucas Geoff (GL4685) sparco@hutchcity.com, Sparco P/L, 20 Nuwarra Rd., Holsworthy, Sidney, NSW 21700, Australia, 61294750166, (FAX) + 61294750166; (5) Network Solutions’ 4.0. ...
2000-08-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Singapore Airlines Limited v. P&P Servicios de Communicacion S.L.
Case No. D2000-0643
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Singapore Airlines Limited, a corporation under the laws of the Republic of Singapore with its address at Airline House, 25 Airline Road, Singapore 819829. ...- NSI is the Registrar of the domain name registrations "singaporeairlines.com".
- P&P Servicios de Communicacion S.L. is shown as the "current registrant" of the domain name "singaporeairlines.com"...
2000-09-11 - Case Details
2005 I, 125 ans de dépôts de marques (numéro spécial), p. 149).
En conséquence, les Dispositions s’appliquent au nom de domaine , puisque celui-ci a été renouvelé après le 1er mars 2004.
...Art. 26, p. 142 et 143). Selon la doctrine, l’exception prévue par l’art. 26 LDA ne s’applique en effet pas aux sites Internet (Dessemontet, op. cit., p. 366 et 367; Barrelet/Egloff, op. cit., p. 143).
...
2006-10-31 - Case Details