About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 6127   document(s)s (0.06 sec)

Rows

<<  <  6081 - 6100  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0568 for jesúsencinar.com html (49 KB)

Proof of the close connection between the Complainant and IDEALISTA, besides the indisputable reputation of success that his online business activity has acquired, is evidenced by virtue of a copy of the results obtained after introducing the term “Jesús Encinar” in the well-known search engine ‘Google’. As can be seen from such copy, which has been attached to the Complaint and provided to the Panel, 6 of the 10 initial results exhibited link the Complainant to the commercial initiatives that he carries out, thereby emphasizing him as the true engine and alma mater of his online businesses. ...

2008-06-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1279 for wifiparis.com html (47 KB)

There is a map on the Respondent's website showing where wifi hotspots can be found in the city of Paris, and some text explaining how the site can be used to locate an appropriate hotspot. There are also some Google advertisements, in the form of click-on links to third party websites offering Internet-related goods or services. ...

2009-12-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0831 for cloro.com html (48 KB)

The word “cloro” existed long before Complainant’s mark. Google traffic analysis tools demonstrate that approximately 550,000 users search for “cloro” per month. ...

2010-08-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1044 for adbankers.com html (47 KB)

In the circumstances, the Respondent asserts that although the “Complainant may have established rights to pass the threshold test in paragraph 4(a)(i) ... these rights are extremely limited”. 5.10 On the issue of rights or interests the Respondent contends that the Complainant’s case amounts to no more than assertion without supporting evidence and criticises the “burden shifting” rule that has been applied in respect of this element of the Policy in a number of cases. 5.11 In any event the Respondent contends that it holds a right or legitimate interest by reason of the fact that it “invests in generic and descriptive domain names for use in connection with dedicated websites providing goods or services or as generic popular search terms to provide advertising and other content”. 5.12 The Respondent also provides evidence in the form of Google searches that is said to show that the terms “ad” and “bankers” are not exclusively associated with the Complainant. ...

2010-10-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0941 for cosmos.com html (119 KB)

- Second, COSMOS is a very widely used a word. The Google search engine reveals 906,000 hits for COSMOS, Altavista 740,647 hits and Excite 66,000 hits....

2001-10-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DMX2014-0025 for bdo.com.mx, bdo.mx html (53 KB)

El término BDO en relación con servicios financieros se asocia estrechamente con las Firmas Miembro BDO, y en México particularmente con Castillo Miranda, tal y como queda acreditado al ingresar BDO en el motor de búsqueda Google, donde los primeros resultados se refieren a “www.bdomexico.com” y la mayoría del resto de los resultados se refieren a otras Firmas Miembro BDO. ...

2014-12-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2775 for whoisgilnegrete.com pdf (217 KB)

He claims to have used Gil Negrete “as an adword on Google and SEO marketing extensively and continuously since June 01, 2017 to identify the Complainant and his law firm, attorneys, and website” and also to have spent “millions of dollars” promoting his “name, image and likeness”. 5.3 The Complainant concedes that the Respondent has a right to establish a website for the purpose of legitimate criticism and commentary, but asserts that the Respondent may not do so via a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s claimed mark. ...

2025-09-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0206 for covancecampaign.com html (52 KB)

A search for the trade mark COVANCE in the Yahoo search engine shows the Respondent’s website ranked second; a search for the trade mark COVANCE in the AltaVista search engine shows the Respondent’s website ranked third; a search for the trade mark COVANCE in the Google search engine shows the Respondent’s website ranked second. The use of the Disputed Domain Name causes confusion amongst Internet users and (potential) customers and relations of Complainants. ...

2004-05-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1216 for chillibeans.com html (51 KB)

In addition, the Complainants place reliance on the results of a Google search conducted on August 4, 2008, reflecting that , which resolves to the Complainants' website, is the most popular search result for the search term “chilli beans”. ...

2008-11-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0454 for metart.com html (54 KB)

These same principals apply in Direct Navigation (PPC) pages where Google (or Yahoo) and its publishers prohibit the use of automated systems that generate clicks.” 5.21 The Respondent also further elaborates on the “pop-up” page issue stating that it has “no idea” how the “pop under page appeared for this site and did not authorize anyone to provide it”. ...

2008-07-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0579 for dhlpost.com html (53 KB)

As for the meanings of the expressions “Digital Hybrid Language Processing”, and “Open Space Technology”, the Respondent produced a number of documents to support his position. First, the Respondent produced Yahoo and Google searches on the expression “Hybrid Language Processing”. These searches provided links to various third party websites, none of which appears to reproduce precisely the expression “Digital Hybrid Language Processing” (for example, none of the links appeared to use the word “digital”, and a number appeared to have the word “natural” added before the words “language processing”). ...

2009-07-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1531 for nannyjob.com html (51 KB)

That is in the content of the “keyword” meta tag where “nanny jobs” is used alongside such terms as “childcare recruitment services” and “child minders”. 6.15 This is also not the sole extent of the Respondent’s evidence on the distinctiveness of the term “Nanny Job”. It also provides a Google search which at first sight appears to show a large number of advertisements in which third parties seek what they call a “nanny job”. ...

2011-11-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2006 for bboytv.com html (51 KB)

In the Panel’s view, there are two flaws in the Complainant’s submission. First, the Complainant claims that a simple Google search would have disclosed its rights although it provides no evidence that it would have featured on the search results and if so to what extent. ...

2012-12-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1643 for quintessentiallyconcierge.com, quintessentiallyconcierge.net html (56 KB)

vi) Consumers have been, and will be, misleadingly diverted to the Respondent’s website. A Google search on the words “quintessentially “ and “concierge” brings up the Respondent’s website as the first result. ...

2007-03-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0300 for assetloanco.net html (53 KB)

It is ironic that my site is found in searches made on Yahoo & MSN & second on Google.’ This email suggests that the Respondent was interested in whether his site effected investment in the Complainant and noted that it had apparently achieved its purpose. ...

2006-05-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0288 for apamanshop.com html (21 KB)

により、本件商標が申立人のものであることも、全国的によく知られるところとなっており、本件ドメイン名を使用したウェブサイトについても、Yahoo!、Google等の大手検索エンジンでの「賃貸」のキーワードによる検索結果で上位に位置し(申立書付録17・18)、アクセス数もトップクラスとなっているため、被申立人が本件ドメイン名を使用すれば、こうした営業上有利な状況にただ乗りすることができるからである。...

2006-05-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1003 for pepperdineuniversitywaves.com, pepperdineuniversitywaves.net html (54 KB)

Respondent contends that Complainant does not have the exclusive right to use the marks to comment on its school and points to the fact that a Google search shows numerous third party uses of the name Pepperdine University. Respondent has a right to use the Domain Names at issue in this case to refer to Complainant, its students and alumni, and to provide services to those individuals who desire to comment on the school. 2. ...

2006-10-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0349 for otenet.com, otenet.org html (56 KB)

This does not mean that they are or would be sold, only that they are re-directed to the “default holding page” for a period of time. Should Google, Alexa or Archive index the domain name during that time, the content of that “holding page” will or could be captured. ...

2005-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0685 for aaaarbitrations.com, difclcia.com, iccarbitrations.com, icdrarbitration.com, icdrarbitrations.com, internationalchamberofcommercearbitration.com, internationalchamberofcommercearbitrations.com, lciaarbitration.com, lciaarbitrations.com, lciamiacarbitration.com ... html (56 KB)

While it may be legal to register descriptive domain names to build a business or to improve a business’s rankings on Google (the Panel makes no findings on this point), it is not permitted under the UDRP to deliberately register a domain name that by its very nature will create a likelihood of confusion with a complainant’s trademark for commercial purposes (unless a registrant itself has demonstrated rights or legitimate interests, which is not the case here). ...

2013-06-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1108 for michelingirl.com, themichelingirl.com pdf (471 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain names , and are registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 31, 2022. ...

2022-06-20 - Case Details