About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 3200   document(s)s (0.028 sec)

Rows

<<  <  2761 - 2780  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3903 for bvlgari.buzz, bvlgariofficial.top, bvlgariofficial.xyz pdf (168 KB)

Previous panel decisions have stated that a lack of reply to a cease and desist letter prior to commencing the proceedings infers bad faith behavior, see Facebook, Inc. and Instagram, LLC v. C W / c w, c w, WIPO Case No. D2018-1159. The Respondent was given the opportunity to provide evidence of any actual or contemplated good faith use but chose not to respond. ...

2022-12-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIO2022-0039 for ebay.io pdf (189 KB)

In addition, Complainant asserts that it has made substantial investments to develop a strong presence online by being active on different social-media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and LinkedIn. As a result, Complainant claims that the term EBAY is exclusively associated with Complainant. ...

2022-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3010 for monsterenergy.pro pdf (190 KB)

2 The Complainant further indicates that as of June 2022, the MONSTER ENERGY Facebook page had more than 25 million likes; its Twitter account had more than 3 million followers; its Instagram page had more than 8.1 million followers; and its TikTok profile had more than 1.4 million followers and 10.5 million likes. 3 The Complainant indicates that its products are sold throughout the United States and many other countries, including but not limited to: Austria, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Venezuela, Uruguay, Albania, Andorra, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, Hong Kong, China, India, Republic of Korea, Philippines, Singapore, Antigua, Barbados, Dominica, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Jamaica, St. ...

2022-10-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCN2022-0020 for maximic.cn pdf (253 KB)

在缺乏合理解释的情况下,专家组认为,被投诉人不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因选择 并注册了争议域名,被投诉人在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍注册争议域名的行为具有恶意。参见 Facebook, Inc. 诉 程飞婷,WIPO 案件编号 DCN2019-0002。 鉴于投诉人的商标在国际市场已广为人知,专家组很难想象被投诉人出于善意使用目的而注册了争议域名。相 反,如上文提到的,根据投诉人提供的信息,争议域名注册后一直指向一个涉及色情内容及含有博彩广告的网 站。...

2022-05-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0371 for rh-carrefour.online pdf (200 KB)

It contends further that the Internet demonstrates its fame and notoriety and that that this is based upon its social media accounts which are either “linked” or “followed” by millions of users, including in Brazil. Social Media Followers Facebook 11,7 millions Linkedin 1,1 millions Instagram 950 000 Twitter 81 000 The Domain Name was registered on October 9, 2021, and leaded to the inactive page on the date of filing of Complaint. ...

2022-05-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0423 for oltreit.shop, oltroulet.online html (22 KB)

Both Domain Names lead respectively to the Websites in Italian language prominently displaying Complainant’s trademark OLTRE and the OLTRE logo of Complainant’s website “www.oltre.com”, publishing official images taken from Complainant’s website “www.oltre.com” and related Complainant’s social media accounts (such as the Facebook page “www.facebook.com/oltrefashion”) and purportedly offering for sale OLTRE products at discounted prices, without providing any disclaimer as to Respondent’s lack of relationship with Complainant and any information on the entity actually operating the Websites. ...

2022-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3503 for onetravelbeirut.com pdf (177 KB)

The website appears to be under development. For example, the Facebook and Instagram links do not operate. Clicking on the “Get in touch” button does nothing. The website states that it was developed by Anzima Group. ...

2023-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4109 for nevedagoldmines.com pdf (164 KB)

Complainant’s LinkedIn page promotes Complainant’s services with a variety of content involving the NEVADA GOLD MINES Mark, including promotional videos, photos, mining-related news, and investment information and has over 31,000 followers. Complainant’s Facebook page, with similar promotional content, has over 26,000 followers. Complainant also shows it uses its NEVADA GOLD MINES Mark as its trade name and incorporates the NEVADA GOLD MINES Mark into its of f icial domain name , used to access Complainant’s official NEVADA GOLD MINES website (“Official Website”) to promote and of fer its mining operations and render its services to its customers under the NEVADA GOLD MINES Mark. ...

2023-12-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3838 for internatixs.com pdf (187 KB)

The Complainant also established a social media presence and uses the NATIXIS Trademark to promote its goods and services on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X and YouTube. The Disputed Domain Name was registered on August 12, 2023. As at the date of this Decision, the Disputed Domain Name resolves to an inactive webpage with indication “this account has been suspended”. ...

2023-11-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4047 for virginatlantic-courier.com pdf (166 KB)

The Complainant also operates pages on various social media platforms, in particular Facebook, X, YouTube, and LinkedIn. The Disputed Domain Name was registered on September 14, 2023. As at the date of this Decision, the Disputed Domain Name resolves to an active website where a host of logistic management services and supply chain solutions, in particular air freight and warehousing, are offered by the company Virgin Atlantic Courier Service. ...

2023-12-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2902 for downloadwhats.app, gbwhatspro.download, ogwhats.app, ogwhats.com, plusgbwhats.app pdf (195 KB)

Founded in 2009 and acquired by Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.) in 2014, the Complainant’s application enables users worldwide to exchange messages, voice notes, images, videos, and to conduct voice and video calls over the Internet. ...

2025-09-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2023-0025 for sap.net.au pdf (88 KB)

WhoIs entries show that the Respondent has registered many domain names incorporating famous and distinctive trademarks such as “BLACKBERRY”, “CHANEL”, “FACEBOOK”, “HOTMAIL”, “MACBOOK”, “MARVEL”, “MTV”, “NINTENDO”, “STAR-WARS” and “TWITTER”. The Panel accepts that this constitutes a “pattern of conduct” of both the registration and use of a domain names to prevent the owner of that name, trademark or service mark from reflecting that name or mark in a corresponding domain name.” ...

2023-07-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DMX2023-0018 for michelintorres.com.mx pdf (62 KB)

“Inicio Servicios Testimonios”, “Esta es su oportunidad para decirles a sus clientes todo lo que necesitan saber acerca de sus productos y servicios y de cómo opera su empresa”, “Contáctenos”, “Ubicación”, una dirección de correo electrónico, un número telefónico, “Facebook LinkedIn Pinterest”. 5. Alegaciones de las Partes A. Promovente Los alegatos del Promovente se pueden resumir como sigue. ...

2023-07-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCN2021-0047 for alstompower.cn html (13 KB)

在缺乏合理解释的情况下,专家组认为,被投诉人不可能在不知晓投诉人商标的情况下而是出于巧合原因选择并注册了争议域名,被投诉人在明知投诉人及其商标的情况下仍注册争议域名的行为具有恶意。参见Facebook, Inc. 诉程飞婷, WIPO案件编号DCN2019-0002。 鉴于投诉人的商标在国际市场已广为人知,专家组很难想象被投诉人出于善意使用目的而注册了争议域名。相反,如上文提到的,根据投诉人提供的信息,争议域名注册后一直指向一个涉及色情内容(包括应用程序的下载)及含有博彩广告的网站。...

2022-02-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2603 for klarnapreipo.com html (23 KB)

The Complainant is also represented on the social media, namely, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. The Respondent has not provided any background information. All that is known about the Respondent is the contact information provided to the Registrar for the purpose of registration of the disputed domain name, which resolves to a website (the “Respondent’s website”) in the nature of financial services, and the information provided on that website. 5. ...

2021-10-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1798 for tiktokshop.com html (23 KB)

With reference to the circumstances evidencing bad faith, the Complainant indicates that, at the time of registration of the disputed domain name, the Respondent knew, or should have known, of the existence of the Complainant’s trademarks, considering the Complainant’s TikTok app has been downloaded by over 500 million users, it is ranked first in the Entertainment category of the Apple Store and the third app amongst Social Networks on Amazon, having surpassed Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube downloads. The Complainant also emphasizes that, considering the disputed domain name resolves to an inactive page, the disputed domain name can only be taken as intending to cause confusion among Internet users as to the source or affiliation of the same with the Complainant. ...

2021-08-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1979 for thepicgram.com html (24 KB)

It notes that prior UDRP panels have held that the unauthorized automated accessing of content from social networks amounts to bad faith. See Facebook, Inc. v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Giap Nguyen Van and Giao Tran Ngoc, WIPO Case No. ...

2021-09-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2125 for valoservice.com html (24 KB)

In addition to websites at the domain names and , the Complainants also have social media accounts including a Facebook account with over 157,000 followers, Twitter with over 34,000 followers, and Instagram with over 13,000 followers. ...

2021-09-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-4483 for qqmeta.com pdf (178 KB)

被投诉人选择“qqmeta”是要打造一个国际版的探究 问题本质的问答社区,并非对投诉人或其他权利人具有恶意。此外,Facebook 更名为“meta”,亦对争议域 名中的“meta”享有权利。 因问答社区暂时没有上线,争议域名暂时还未使用。 第 3 页 被投诉人请求专家组驳回投诉人的争议域名转移请求。 ...

2023-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3689 for nv4geospatial.com pdf (416 KB)

Furthermore, while the page 6 website includes tabs for both “Projects” and “Case Studies” both of these resolve to a “Coming Soon” message. In addition, links to Facebook, Twitter and other social media do not appear to be operational. The Panel’s difficulty with the evidence described above illustrates that this is not a suitable dispute for determination under the UDRP which, as the Respondent correctly observes, is a forum for resolving what are essentially “cybersquatting” cases and not for determining more complex business disputes. ...

2022-12-06 - Case Details